Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats want voting machines with printers (Jackson County)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 09:17 AM
Original message
Democrats want voting machines with printers (Jackson County)
http://www.gulflive.com/news/mississippipress/news.ssf?/base/news/1202555707308850.xml
VETO F. ROLEY

PASCAGOULA -- The Jackson County Democratic Party wants a printer attached to the Diebold voting machines used by county voters.

The reason, party members said, is because the Diebold machines are not reliable.

Robert Smith, a member of the party's executive committee, said there were problems in 27 states that used the Diebold machines, including issues in Harrison and Hancock counties. In some cases, he said, the machines failed to register large numbers of votes.

"Without a paper trail, there is no way to find out if there is a problem," Smith said. "There is no way to check if the Diebold makes an error."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donkeykick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. I hope the printers aren't...
made by Diebold too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. How much would a printer helper if the PROPRIETARY CODE ...
was written to flip the vote when the 1500th vote is cast?

You're number 1300 and your vote is printed out just fine, but when the results are posted in Campaign Central -- after 2000 votes are cast, for example -- the wrong candidate is in the lead.

Have I got this right?
Isn't this a possibility if we can't see the code?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC