Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Failed Again: Widely-Used Diebold Touch-Screens Systems Dropped Votes in Recent Ohio Primary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 11:39 PM
Original message
Failed Again: Widely-Used Diebold Touch-Screens Systems Dropped Votes in Recent Ohio Primary


BLOGGED BY Brad Friedman ON 4/8/2008 3:00PM

SNIP...Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner, who completed a massive study last year of Ohio's e-voting systems, finding numerous programming errors and "critical security concerns," has recommended that the state permanently ban the use of all touch-screen systems. Following the findings of her landmark EVEREST tests, last December she urged counties in the Buckeye State to move from touch-screen voting to paper-based systems. Almost all of the state's Election Directors have ignored her recommendations.

Diebold's voting systems have become legion for their persistent failures during elections, and the ease in which study after study across the country have found that they can be hacked in a moments time by insiders who gain access to either a single voting machine or their central tabulation computer. Vote-flipping viruses can be added via their memory cards, the machines are all opened with a single matching key, and the database which stores vote totals on Microsoft Access easily corrupted to change vote totals without detection.

One other rather notable revelation is also made in the letter sent to Diebold/Premier by Butler's officials:

Holeman speculated that the problem could stem from the size of a database being larger than 2 gigs. Mr. Holeman explained that the central count server used for scanning and uploading Absentee and Optical Scan Ballots was taking up too much space in the database and outlined a procedure for backing up, deleting and compressing data before continuing with the uploading of memory cards. He went on to say that Premier was aware of this problem and that they would be issuing a product advisory. To date, we have not received such notification. Mr. Bunch then reviewed the size of our database and found it to be an acceptable size (245mb), causing our office to question Mr. Holemans conclusion of too large of a database causing the problem.

So with just a few months left before what is likely to be the largest election in the history of the United States, in addition to the possibility of memory card totals showing as having been uploaded --- when they haven't been --- we learn that there is also a size limit that could effect the proper tabulation of election results on Diebold's widely used GEMS central tabulator.

Not good.


http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5879
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Greatest n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. I was watching a documentary today about McGovern's campaign
and I found it interesting that there were many voting irregularities in...................









Wait for it..................................










Ohio!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yea, Jennifer!
:applause: K&R! I only hope she's ready to kick more BoE butt if the machines don't get dumped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC