Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Escambia FL - tabulation machines caused an inaccurate number

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 05:46 AM
Original message
Escambia FL - tabulation machines caused an inaccurate number
Escambia voters had a great turnout - but not that great
A tabulation error had nearly 85 percent of the county's registered voters voting. It was more like 75 percent.

November 16, 2004

In the wake of the election, records showed that 84.9 percent of the storm-ravaged county's 189,833 voters cast ballots, well above the average state turnout of 72 percent.

Not true.

A problem with the way tabulation machines feed information into the computer system caused an inaccurate number, said Bonnie Jones, Escambia's supervisor of elections.

While the machines accurately counted the number of absentee votes, they began feeding an incorrect result into the office's computers, she said.

"It skewed the total vote," Jones said.

<snip>

Elections officials noticed the problem almost immediately when the system showed that no one had voted yes on Amendments 7 and 8. That, she said, was a glaring error.



http://www.sptimes.com/2004/11/16/State/Escambia_voters_had_a.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Haven't you heard? They certified FL vote yesterday...
"It was a wish come true Sunday for Florida's elections officials: no cameras, few questions and a clear decision."

http://news.bostonherald.com/politics/view.bg?articleid=54168&format=text
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, right!
With all the military installations and military retirees, I guess they had to cheat as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. So if the amendment votes weren't suspicious
Would they have detected this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC