Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Source: Vikes have deal for Randy Moss

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:22 AM
Original message
Source: Vikes have deal for Randy Moss
Randy Moss' improbable return to Minnesota is about to become reality.

The Vikings and the Patriots have agreed to a blockbuster trade that will send the Pro Bowl wide receiver back to Minnesota for the Vikings' 2011 third-round pick on Wednesday, a league source told ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter.

When the trade is completed, the Patriots will have two picks in each of the first four rounds of the 2011 draft -- their own picks and a first-round pick from Oakland, a second-round pick from Carolina, the third-round pick from Minnesota and a fourth-rounder from Denver.

A source close to Moss told ESPN NFL senior analyst Chris Mortensen that Patriots coach Bill Belichick informed Moss of the trade on Wednesday morning by telephone. The source said the conversation was cordial, with both men expressing appreciation for the time they spent together.

http://sports.espn.go.com/boston/nfl/news/story?id=5653186
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Probably for the best...Moss didn't seem to want to stay...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's how I see it.
It takes away a big threat for the Pats, and lets defenders cover other guys better, but what can you do? I like seeing them pile up those draft picks, that's for sure. I'm pretty sure they now have 703 picks in next year's draft. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Sounds like this was the nail in the coffin
http://sports.espn.go.com/boston/nfl/news/story?id=5655198
I still think Minnesota is gambling big time here. Doesn't sound like he's lost the attitude that got him shipped out from MN originally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Absolutely gambling. But a 3rd round pick isn't bad to gamble with on this one.
I am certainly hoping that Moss comes in with something to prove and we get the first few seasons Randy Moss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Link's not working...is this about the "outburst" at halftime Monday? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yeah. And that WOULD explain this happening fairly abruptly
Pats don't tolerate that kind of stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. No, they don't...
I'm glad they don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Eight picks in the first four rounds,
done right, could ensure competivness for many years to come
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a kennedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. D*mn
I just hate the viqueens...... :puke: GO PACK GO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyepaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Your tears are like candy.
However much you hate the Vikings, double that, that's how I feel about the Pukers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GusBob Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. favre calling the shots
why not just let him coach the team
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I think it is the Vikings
Trying replace Sidney Rice because he is out. They also signed Javon Walker and traded for Greg Camarillo earlier this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Some feel he already is
Locker-room sources say the frost between Childress and Favre is palpable right now, a bad situation obviously exacerbated by the Vikings’ disappointing 1-2 start. The surprising trade that brings Moss back to Minneapolis, on the heels of a failed attempt to land disgruntled San Diego Chargers wideout Vincent Jackson(notes), is a last-ditch effort to salvage an increasingly volatile situation – one which could take down virtually all of the leading figures if things break the wrong way.

===

The growing tension between Favre and Childress, and the sense that the quarterback doesn’t have much respect for the coach as an offensive strategist, has been well-documented since last season – most thoroughly by Y! Sports’ Jason Cole in August. The aforementioned team sources say things have remained strained in recent weeks, with Childress questioning Favre for having altered some plays at the line of scrimmage and questioning his commitment to the team.

Before the Vikings scored their first victory of the season two Sundays ago against the Lions, the previously quoted source says, the two men went nearly a week without speaking. This is a war that, in my opinion, Childress does not want to wage. Yes, he got a contract extension last season, mostly on the strength of Favre’s brilliance. No, he’s not viewed as indispensable by ownership – especially if things degenerate rapidly over the next few months.

Now, be it through the grace of Wilf’s chutzpah or Childress’ own sense of self-preservation, Favre has been handed the most potent deep threat of this era, or perhaps any era. Beginning with his suddenly scintillating return to New Jersey to face the Jets next Monday night, Favre will be throwing to Moss, a player he unsuccessfully lobbied the Packers to acquire before it all blew up for him in Green Bay.

more-

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ms-32questions100610
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Childress sucks.
Thought that when they hired him over Fraser and he has done nothing but confirm my beliefs. He is the reason we lost the NFC championship game last year. His play calling sucks. Never should have been in the position to have to throw that ball if Childress was half the offensive genius he thinks he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I agree with you.
I thought he was far more to blame than Favre last year. And so far this year, what I've seen he's not doing any better of a job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC