Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Important South Dakota Update.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Choice Donate to DU
 
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 01:09 AM
Original message
Important South Dakota Update.
Thursday, May 18, 2006
Not Taking Any Chances
by digby
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2006_05_01_digbysblog_archive.html#114798522522562470

SIOUX FALLS, SD – Today’s Argus Leader newspaper revealed that Attorney General Larry Long has been asked to give his opinion on the timeframe for the circulation of petitions to refer the abortion ban passed by the legislature to the voters of South Dakota.

Central to the request of the Attorney General is a question being forwarded by two South Dakota legislators who are working on an expensive legal strategy to prevent the people of South Dakota a chance to vote to keep or repeal the near-total ban on abortions.

State Senator Lee Schoenbeck and State Representative Roger Hunt, the chief author of the abortion ban, are concocting a legal strategy to shut down the petition-signing process nearly three weeks before the deadline set under South Dakota law and confirmed by Secretary of State Chris Nelson. Nelson has consistently said the deadline for petitions is June 19, but Hunt and Schoenbeck believe it should be nearly three weeks earlier, shutting off opportunities for South Dakota voters to sign petitions.


You have to wonder why they would bother with this unless they have information that leads them to believe the referendum rejecting the draconian coat-hanger law might succeed. -digby.



Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Please help if you can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. How very sad that SD would rule that a woman
must carry a child of her rapist, and even endangers her life. It will be a cold day in hell before we'd ever spend a cent there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. how soon can these bastards be voted out of office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. They Want it to Go to the USSC and Overturn Roe v Wade!
They certainly DON'T want a VOTE on the issue, which they would lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Women need to flex their muscle.
NO way will I pay taxes to a government who rules my body as state property and mandates whether I will give birth to a child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
American Tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Agreed.
If it were to happen in my state, I would relocate to someplace where my rights were respected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
emal2me Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. Support Naral Pro-Choice
Naral Pro-Choice America has set up a special office in South Dakota. Check it out and give support. Thanks

http://www.prochoicesd.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. SD is reprehensible for anti-choice, but....
I don't know...did South Dakota have any abortion providers in state, before this total-ban (say total ban fast it sounds like taliban) on abortions?
My close associate is driving around S.D. for business. He said S.D. is a big vast empty state. Hard to find a motel sometimes, he said. Had to sleep in a haunted hotel one dreadful night, he said. Lots of vast prairie-middle-of-nowhere, with countless wild turkeys.

Could it be....South Dakota needs more people?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tilsammans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-30-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. Please read this GOOD NEWS from SD now!
http://www.sdhealthyfamilies.org/


:applause: :yourock: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Choice Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC