Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Schools: The New Republican Sweatshops for Kids

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Education Donate to DU
Modern School Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-11 11:21 AM
Original message
Schools: The New Republican Sweatshops for Kids
Republican Presidential hopeful (charlatan) Newt Gingrich has called on schools to fire their unionized janitors and replace them with underpaid, underage school children, especially in low income schools (from

In a wonderful bit of double speak, Gingrich said that the "Core policies of protecting unionization and bureaucratization against children in the poorest neighborhoods, crippling them by putting them in schools that fail has done more to create income inequality in the United States than any other single policy. It is tragic what we do in the poorest neighborhoods, entrapping children in, first of all, child laws, which are truly stupid.

In Gingrichs world, poor children are poor because of lousy teachers, lousy schools and greedy union janitors who refuse to give up their jobs to juveniles. They are poor because they have not been allowed to work by misguided child labor laws, denied the right to learn how to make money. Childhood poverty is a problem that must be fixed by the kids themselves, if we would only give them the chance. If we only let them have jobs, they would rise to the occasion, work hard, and achieve the American dream that their deadbeat parents failed to even attempt.

This delusion of course ignores the fact that many poor children do in fact work after school, evenings and weekends. Others do unpaid work at home helping their families survive, caring for siblings, doing the shopping, cooking and laundry. It also presumes that the low paid work available to kids, like paper routes, lawn mowing, burger-slinging and babysitting, necessarily leads to a successful later career and class mobility.

Of course putting kids to work at schools makes good economic sense. They dont have to be paid much, certainly less than the adults who are doing the janitorial work at union wages, something schools can hardly afford in these bleak economic times. If we did fire all the union janitors and replaced them with kids, think of all the money that would be saved.

But why stop there? Why not fire the secretaries and replace them with students. Schools dont need copy clerks. Any teenager can photocopy tests and worksheets. Students are just as capable as adults at running barcodes through scannersso why not replace the librarians with students, too?

Students could also dispense bandages and help call home when their peers are sick or injured. We could put the tech-savvy ones in charge of computer and website maintenance. Rather than having the go-getters take student leadership class and limit themselves to organizing dances and rallies, why not have them facilitate faculty meetings and public relations? In fact, maybe the school president could replace the principal and the class vice president could be the assistant principal?

Modern School
Refresh | +11 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Education Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC