Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HRC Statement on Vermont Governor’s Veto of Marriage Equality Legislation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 05:24 PM
Original message
HRC Statement on Vermont Governor’s Veto of Marriage Equality Legislation
http://www.hrc.org/12452.htm

4/6/2009
WASHINGTON – The Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) civil rights organization, came out in strong opposition to today’s veto by Governor Douglas of marriage equality legislation. The bill, S. 115, which would provide marriage rights to lesbian and gay couples, passed the Vermont State Senate by a vote of 26 to 4 and the Vermont State House of Representatives by a vote of 95 to 52.

“This move by Governor Douglas denies basic human rights to lesbian and gay couples who live in the State of Vermont,” said Joe Solmonese, President of the Human Rights Campaign. “We ask all fair-minded residents of Vermont to call their legislators immediately and urge them to stand up for equality by overriding Governor Douglas’ veto. It is our hope that the Vermont legislature will override this veto and ensure that all loving and committed couples are afforded the basic right to marry.”

Shortly after the House and Senate versions of the bill were reconciled today, Governor Douglas fulfilled his threat to veto the legislation, sending it back to the Vermont legislature for an override vote which is expected to take place soon. Two-thirds of legislators present in each chamber would be required to vote in favor of overriding the Governor’s veto. If the legislature overrides Gov. Douglas’ veto, Vermont will become the first state to provide marriage equality for committed lesbian and gay couples through the legislative process. (California’s legislature has twice passed similar legislation that was vetoed and not enacted into law).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fucker.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Grant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. And which smug member of DU will be the first to call my anger -- "poutrage"? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC