Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The rights rollback continues in Michigan (no benefits for state domestic partners)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 01:52 PM
Original message
The rights rollback continues in Michigan (no benefits for state domestic partners)
Court Of Appeals Voids Michigan Domestic Partner Benefits. I hope that our "let the states decide" Dem presidential candidates take note of what happens when you let voters determine the rights of gay folks at the ballot box.

The state's constitutional marriage amendment, which passed in 2004, has now resulted in benefits being taken away from gay couples.

The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled Friday that the state's constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage prevents public institutions from providing benefits to same-sex partners of employees.

Soon after the amendment was passed in 2004 Gov. Jennifer Granholm (D), acting on the advice of Attorney General Mike Cox (R), terminated domestic partner benefits that had been won by state unions.

Cox also directed University of Michigan and Wayne State University and the city of Kalamazoo to shut down their benefits programs to same-sex couples.


This ruling overturns a county circuit judge's decision that health care benefits are tied to employment, not marriage. The Court of Appeal cited the amendment's language, which disallows marriage for gays and lesbians and civil unions or domestic partnerships.

"The marriage amendment's plain language prohibits public employers from recognizing same-sex unions for any purpose."


This is bullsh*t -- it should really do wonders for state universities in Michigan that hope to attract excellent faculty and staff. Good luck with that.

http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=641
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, then. A child is not married to its parents.
I think we should revoke health benefits for their kids. After all- THEY aren't married to the providers of their health insurance.

Yes, I'm in a very bad mood today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Siyahamba Donating Member (890 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting how Attorney General Cox insists on following the letter of the law
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070115/COL04/701150333/1001/BUSINESS05

He could be prosecuted by the law of his own state for the affair he had, and be charged with a felony and life in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC