Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Google defends decisions to remove anti-gay hate website

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 08:06 AM
Original message
Google defends decisions to remove anti-gay hate website
February 27, 2007


Date: 27/02/2007 By Tony Grew

Google has confirmed that they removed a homophobic blog from their blogger.com service because it was in breach of their terms and conditions. The company defended their decision last week not to remove the offending webpage. The blog, called killbattyman, featured numerous highly offensive images and comments about LGBT people and called for them all to be executed. The latest post featured a doctored image of Peter Tatchell holding a placard with a sexually explicit picture of a child on it.

It is thought that this image of a child is the reason that Google decided to take the blog offline. "We will act to remove blogs which are in clear breach of our terms and conditions," Rachel Whetstone, director of corporate communications for Google Europe, told PinkNews.co.uk She declined to say which condition had been breached.

"We removed the blog today as quickly as we could," she said. Peter Tatchell, who was one of the people vilified on the site, welcomed the decision. "Thanks to Pink News and everyone else who lobbied Google to remove this murderous website," he said. "It is good that Google has heard our concerns but bad that it took them so long to respond.

"If this website had been advocating the killing of black or Jewish people, I am certain that Google would have taken a much tougher stand and removed it much sooner. "This is not a free speech issue. Free speech does not include the right to incite the killing of other human beings. "Ms Whetstone defended Google's decision. "We respect the fact that people may disagree with this, but as a company we believe that freedom of expression and freedom of speech are very important. "There are many things on the Web which certain groups find upsetting or distasteful.

"It is up to governments to decide at the end of the day where freedom of speech begins and ends." The decision to remove the homophobic blog was welcomed by Ben Summerskill, the chief executive of gay rights organisation Stonewall. "We are delighted that Google has listened to common sense," he told PinkNews.co.uk "It is common sense that means you cannot divorce incitement to hatred from the reality of what is happening on the street. "That is why we are pressing the government to introduce an offence of incitement to hatred which matches the offence of incitement to racial hatred."

On Friday Google decided to put up a page warning people that the content on killbattyman blog might be offensive. The warning page disappeared over the weekend, but was restored this morning. Ms Whetstone said the company is reviewing why the page went down.

More:
http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2007/02/google-defends-decisions-on-gay-hate.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. I have read this post twice. Did they remove the blog or not. This post says they did and then it
seems to say they didn't. ?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
foreigncorrespondent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I just googled...
Edited on Wed Feb-28-07 10:01 PM by foreigncorrespondent
...the dickheads name, and it seems to have een pulled. He/she had more than site, and every link I clicked lead me to either another search or a message saying it had been pulled.

On edit: typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreigncorrespondent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. We should start something about this with Google!
These fuckers refused to remove the hateful shit when it called for the execution of all queers, but when the idiot running the blog decides to equate pedophilia with gay people they pull it, because it features a picture of a child in a sexually explicit way. Why? Because they didn't want to get done for child porn would be my bet.

Now don't get me wrong here anyone. I am really not for child porn. Things like that should never happen. But the point I am making is, it is ok to call for the execution of a group of people and Google think that is ok. And that is what angers me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sstacy Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. WOW
LOL,I've seen the blog and i'm sorry but it has to be a parody or a joke.No one who is serious would put that kind of crap on a website.I actually think that website is disturbingly funny.If this is a -serious- blog,I have to laugh at the stupidity of the person or persons it's made and written by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC