Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On The Search for Gay Obituaries: Arthur C. Clarke (The Times Version)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
swimmernsecretsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:25 PM
Original message
On The Search for Gay Obituaries: Arthur C. Clarke (The Times Version)
Edited on Tue Mar-18-08 11:27 PM by swimmernsecretsea
(note: I went online to search for an article that mentioned the death of Science Fiction literature legend Arthur C. Clarke, and also mentioned his sexual orientation. I noticed that a number of obituaries didn't mention it, something that rings alarm bells when I notice it. I've posted instead a blog entry that memorializes Arthur C. Clarke while mentioning his being gay, but notes that other obituaries leave this out.)


In which The Gay Recluse provides a more accurate obituary for Arthur C. Clarke than the one that just appeared in The Times.

Arthur C. Clarke, Premier Science Fiction Writer, Dies at 90

By GERALD JONAS and THE GAY RECLUSE
Published: March 18, 2008

Arthur C. Clarke, a writer and long-time closet case whose seamless blend of scientific expertise and poetic imagination helped usher in the space age, died early Wednesday in Colombo, Sri Lanka, where he had lived since 1956. He was 90.

Rohan de Silva, an aide to Mr. Clarke, said the author died after experiencing breathing problems, The Associated Press reported. Mr. Clarke had post-polio syndrome for the last two decades and used a wheelchair.

From his detailed forecast of telecommunications satellites in 1945, more than a decade before the first orbital rocket flight, to his co-creation, with the director Stanley Kubrick, of the classic science fiction film “2001: A Space Odyssey,” Mr. Clarke was both prophet and promoter of the idea that humanity’s destiny lay beyond the confines of Earth. Sadly, however, he never owned up to being gay.

Other early advocates of a space program argued that it would pay for itself by jump-starting new technology. Mr. Clarke set his sights higher. Paraphrasing William James, he suggested that exploring the solar system could serve as the “moral equivalent” of war, giving an outlet to energies that might otherwise lead to nuclear holocaust.

Mr. Clarke’s influence on public attitudes toward space was acknowledged by American astronauts and Russian cosmonauts, by scientists like the astronomer Carl Sagan and by movie and television producers. Gene Roddenberry credited Mr. Clarke’s writings with giving him courage to pursue his “Star Trek” project in the face of indifference, even ridicule, from television executives.

In his later years, after settling in Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) — where he famously hosted orgies for young Sri Lankan men — Mr. Clarke continued to bask in worldwide acclaim as both a scientific sage and the pre-eminent science fiction writer of the 20th century. In 1998, he was knighted by Queen Elizabeth II.

He played down his success in foretelling a globe-spanning network of communication satellites. “No one can predict the future,” he always maintained.

But as a science fiction writer, he couldn’t resist drawing up timelines for what he called “possible futures,” none of which, however, included any gay people. Far from displaying uncanny prescience, these conjectures mainly demonstrated his lifelong, and often disappointed, optimism about the peaceful uses of technology — from his calculation in 1945 that atomic-fueled rockets could be no more than 20 years away to his conviction in 1999 that “clean, safe power” from “cold fusion” would be commercially available in the first years of the new millennium. It was often noted that he had his head in the clouds in more ways than one.

Mr. Clarke was well aware of the importance of his role as science spokesman to the general population: “Most technological achievements were preceded by people writing and imagining them,” he noted. “I’m sure we would not have had men on the Moon,” he added, if it had not been for H.G. Wells and Jules Verne. “I’m rather proud of the fact that I know several astronauts who became astronauts through reading my books.” That said, he never admitted to liking men, and so did a disservice to untold numbers of young gay writers throughout the world who admired his work.

Arthur Charles Clarke was born on Dec. 16, 1917, in the seaside town of Minehead, Somerset, England. His father was a farmer; his mother a post office telegrapher. The eldest of four children, he was educated as a scholarship student at a secondary school in the nearby town of Taunton. He remembered a number of incidents in early childhood that awakened his imagination: exploratory rambles along the Somerset shoreline, with its “wonderland of rock pools;” a card from a pack of cigarettes that his father showed him, with a picture of a dinosaur; the gift of a Meccano set, a British construction toy similar to the Erector sets sold in the United States; the time he witnessed two men fucking down by the abandoned railway line.

He also spent time “mapping the Moon” through a telescope he constructed himself out of “a cardboard tube and a couple of lenses.” But the formative event of his childhood was his discovery, at age 13 — the year his father died — of a copy of “Astounding Stories of Super-Science,” then the leading American science fiction magazine. He found its mix of boyish adventure and far-out (sometimes bogus) science almost as intoxicating as his same-sex fantasies.

While still in school, Mr. Clarke joined the newly formed British Interplanetary Society, a small band of sci-fi enthusiasts who held the controversial view that space travel was not only possible but could be achieved in the not-so-distant future. In 1937, a year after he moved to London to take a civil service job, he began writing his first science fiction novel, a story of the far, far future that was later published as “Against the Fall of Night” (1953).

Mr. Clarke spent World War II as an officer in the Royal Air Force. In 1943 he was assigned to work with a team of American scientist-engineers who had developed the first radar-controlled system for landing airplanes in bad weather. That experience led to Mr. Clarke’s only non-science fiction novel, “Glide Path” (1963). More important, it led in 1945 to a technical paper, published in the British journal “Wireless World,” establishing the feasibility of artificial satellites as relay stations for Earth-based communications.

The “meat” of the paper was a series of diagrams and equations showing that “space stations” parked in a circular orbit roughly 22,240 miles above the equator would exactly match the Earth’s rotation period of 24 hours. In such an orbit, a satellite would remain above the same spot on the ground, providing a “stationary” target for transmitted signals, which could then be retransmitted to wide swaths of territory below. This so-called geostationary orbit has been officially designated the Clarke Orbit by the International Astronomical Union.

Decades later, Mr. Clarke called his “Wireless World” paper “the most important thing I ever wrote.” In a wry piece entitled, “A Short Pre-History of Comsats, Or: How I Lost a Billion Dollars in My Spare Time,” he claimed that a lawyer had dissuaded him from applying for a patent. The lawyer, he said, thought the notion of relaying signals from space was too far-fetched to be taken seriously.

But Mr. Clarke also acknowledged that nothing in his paper — from the notion of artificial satellites to the mathematics of the geostationary orbit — was new. His chief contribution was to clarify and publicize an idea whose time had almost come — a feat of consciousness-raising that was in marked contrast to his views on homosexuality, but one at which he would continue to excel at throughout his career.

The year 1945 also saw the launch of Mr. Clarke’s career as a fiction writer. He sold a short story called “Rescue Party” to the same magazine — now re-titled Astounding Science Fiction — that had captured his imagination 15 years earlier.

For the next two years, Mr. Clarke attended Kings College, London, on the British equivalent of a G.I. Bill scholarship, graduating in 1948 with first-class honors in physics and mathematics. But he continued to write and sell stories, and after a stint as assistant editor at the scientific journal Physics Abstracts, he decided he could support himself as a freelance writer. Success came quickly. His primer on space flight, “The Exploration of Space,” was a Book-of-the-Month Club selection in 1951

Over the next two decades, he wrote a series of nonfiction bestsellers as well as his best-known novels, including “Childhood’s End” (1953) and “2001: A Space Odyssey” (1968). For a scientifically trained writer whose optimism about technology seemed boundless, Mr. Clarke delighted in confronting his characters with obstacles they could not overcome without help from forces beyond their comprehension.

In “Childhood’s End,” a race of aliens who happen to look like devils imposes peace on an Earth torn by cold war tensions. But the aliens’ real mission is to prepare humanity for the next stage of evolution. In an ending that is both heartbreakingly poignant and literally earth-shattering, the self-hating Mr. Clarke suggests that mankind can escape its suicidal tendencies only by ceasing to be human.

“There was nothing left of Earth,” he wrote. “It had nourished them, through the fierce moments of their inconceivable metamorphosis, as the food stored in a grain of wheat feeds the infant plant while it climbs toward the Sun.”

The cold war also forms the backdrop for “2001.” Its genesis was a short story called “The Sentinel,” first published in a science fiction magazine in 1951. It tells of an alien artifact found on the Moon, a little crystalline pyramid that explorers from Earth destroy while trying to open. One explorer realizes that the artifact was a kind of fail-safe beacon; in silencing it, human beings have signaled their existence to its far-off creators.

In the spring of 1964, Stanley Kubrick, fresh from his triumph with “Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb,” met Mr. Clarke in New York, and the two agreed to make the “proverbial really good science fiction movie” based on “The Sentinel.” This led to a four-year collaboration; Mr. Clarke wrote the novel while Mr. Kubrick produced and directed the film; they are jointly credited with the screenplay.

Reviewers at the time were puzzled by the film, especially the final scene in which an astronaut who has been transformed by aliens returns to orbit the Earth as a “Star-Child.” In the book he demonstrates his new-found powers by harmlessly detonating from space the entire arsenal of Soviet and American nuclear weapons. Like much of the plot, this denouement is not clear in the film, from which Mr. Kubrick cut most of the expository material.

As a fiction writer, Mr. Clarke was — no surprise — often criticized for failing to create fully realized characters. HAL, the mutinous computer in “2001,” is probably his most “human” creation: a self-satisfied know-it-all with a touching but misguided faith in its own infallibility.

If Mr. Clarke’s heroes are less than memorable, it is also true that there are no out-and-out villains in his work; his characters are generally too busy struggling to make sense of an implacable universe to engage in petty schemes of dominance or revenge.

Mr. Clarke’s own relationship with machines — as with women — was somewhat ambivalent. Although he held a driver’s license as a young man, he never drove a car. Yet he stayed in touch with the rest of the world from his home in Sri Lanka through an ever-expanding collection of up-to-date computers and communications accessories. And until his health declined, he was an expert scuba diver in the waters around Sri Lanka.

He first became interested in diving in the early 1950s, when he realized that he could find underwater “something very close to weightlessness” of outer space. He settled permanently in Colombo, the capital of what was then Ceylon, in 1956. With a business partner, he established a guided diving service for tourists and wrote vividly about his diving experiences in a number of books, beginning with “The Coast of Coral” (1956).

All told, he wrote or collaborated on close to 100 books, some of which, like “Childhood’s End,” have been in print continuously. His works have been translated into some 40 languages, and worldwide sales have been estimated at more than $25 million.

In 1962 he suffered a severe attack of poliomyelitis. His apparently complete recovery was marked by a return to top form at his favorite sport, table tennis. But in 1984 he developed post-polio syndrome, a progressive condition characterized by muscle weakness and extreme fatigue. He spent the last years of his life in a wheelchair.

Among his legacies are Clarke’s Four Laws, provocative observations on science, science fiction and society that were published in his “Profiles of the Future” (1962):

¶“When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.”

¶“The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.”

¶“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.”

¶“Never come out of the closet, even if you have nothing to lose.”

Along with Verne and Wells, Mr. Clarke said his greatest influences as a writer were Lord Dunsany, a British fantasist noted for his lyrical, if sometimes overblown, prose; Otto Stapledon, a British philosopher who wrote vast speculative narratives that projected human evolution to the furthest reaches of space and time; and the completely gay Herman Melville’s “Moby-Dick.”

While sharing his passions for space and the sea with a worldwide readership, Mr. Clarke tried but failed to keep his “emotional life” private. Most absurdly, he was briefly married in 1953 to an American diving enthusiast named Marilyn Mayfield; they separated after a few months and were divorced in 1964.

One of his closest relationships was with Leslie Ekanayake, a fellow man-diver in Sri Lanka, who died in a motorcycle accident in 1977. In addition to numerous young “man servants,” Mr. Clarke shared his home in Colombo with Leslie’s brother, Hector, his partner in the diving business, Hector’s wife Valerie; and their three daughters.

Mr. Clarke’s stupid answer when journalists asked him outright if he was gay was, “No, merely mildly cheerful.”

Like many closet cases, Mr. Clarke reveled in his fame. One whole room in his house — which he referred to as the Ego Chamber — was filled with photos and other memorabilia of his career, including pictures of him with Yuri Gagarin, the first man in space, and Neil Armstrong, the first man to walk on the moon.

Regrettably he never came out. While this lack of courage will always be tied to his legacy, Mr. Clarke’s reputation as a prophet of the space age rests on more than a few accurate predictions. His visions helped bring about the future he longed to see. His contributions to the space program were lauded by Charles Kohlhase, who planned NASA’s Cassini mission to Saturn: “When you dream what is possible, and add a knowledge of physics, you make it happen.”

Source Link: http://thegayrecluse.com/2008/03/18/on-the-search-for-gay-obituaries-arthur-c-clarke-the-times-version/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. i didn't know he had died
RIP A.C.C.

thanks for posting this news.
dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not Everyone Is a Professional Gay Person, Nor Need One Be
One's sexuality is an intensely private matter, unless one chooses to reveal it or revel in it. And Dr. Clarke was British and of a more prudent generation, which knew that the one way to preserve privacy was to exercise it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swimmernsecretsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Interestingly, I agree.
Edited on Wed Mar-19-08 12:16 AM by swimmernsecretsea
And I've had discussions of this sort with others on the GLBT forum. I feel that if someone not answered this question, and refuses to, their private life should indeed be respected. I have to admit that when a politician or religious leader actively promotes discrimination and attempts to deny the rights of the LGBT community, then the gloves are off. Allowing someone who seeks to harm others through their acts of prejudice and internalized homophobia while taking advantage of what protections we have and continuing to have sexual and personal relationships negates their right. I do understand that this is my belief, however, and that this is not universally agreed upon.

Arthur C. Clarke came from a generation that had far less freedoms than we enjoy today, and for whom not only public but self-denial was common and reflexive. He had been outed publicly long ago, however, and did not dispute this. At that point, it is a part of his biography that can't be denied. Excluding elements of a person's life in his obituary is a holdover from a previous era, and no longer does any good to a person or his survivors. It shouldn't be excluded as if it were something to be ashamed of, but in past history it often was. Continuing this quaint but useless habit in journalism no longer has a purpose.

One of the very first science fiction novels I ever encountered was "2001: A Space Odyssey." The story was important to me because it showed me the progression of our civilization, the efforts of our current civilization to progress, and the unknown and sometimes hazardous motion forward of our future. I moved on to "Rendezvous with Rama," a book about the first historic encounter with an alien culture. I read "Rendezvous With Rama" when I was in an accelerated learning program in high school in the '70's, partly due to the influence of the instructor, who I adored and considered my mentor. It would have meant so much to learn of Arthur Clarke's private life, the portion he chose to keep secret most of his life, but that's all water under the bridge now. The secret is out of the bag now, so why not bring that to generations to come that would benefit from another example of our rich LGBT history?

PS: "Professional Gay Person" ? What a strange thing to say. I suppose there are some who are more "out" if thats what you refer to. Some who make it clear they were never "in." But that sounds offensive, and is pretty inaccurate of a description of most people who are public figures and are known to be LGBT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Anyone who chooses to be defined first by their sexuality...
is doing a disservice to their peers, especially the young ones still struggling with their identity and trying to find their way.

Each of us should be judged for our accomplishments and the example we set, not by who we're sleeping with. As soon as sex becomes the main topic - as we have seen even today - the rest is out the window: The puerile imagination takes over and anything of real value becomes, at best, secondary to the discussion; at worst, inconsequential. We, as a nation, are sexually repressed and need to get over our fascination with pee-pees, whoo-whoos and which of us are playing with either.

A recent discussion with an older woman about her apparent disgust over a rather feminine man in our common employ ended with my telling her she had a filthy mind and was obsessed with other peoples sexuality. I don't think she walked away happy (she obviously wanted the young man fired), but I do hope I gave her something to think about.

I have known for years that A.C.C. was gay and, having read most of his books, I think I've always knew. His insight and morality always struck a chord in me that could only have originated with someone of like mind. Perhaps he was hoping that his writing alone would reach that segment of his audience ready and willing to understand, on whatever level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Well said.
Tact and grace are sorely needed qualities today. I don't think he was ashamed of what he was, I think he was just content.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swimmernsecretsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. I quite agree.
Living with it comfortably is what he seemed to have done. How many of us would wish to be content with our situation. I believe he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. He did make a passing reference to being gay in a Playboy interview.
I remember reading it years ago, and he said something to the effect of (working on memory here) "Any man who denies having sex with another man is a liar". Or something similar. I assumed he was either gay or bi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Clarke
I had no idea he was gay. I can't say I ever felt any particular affinity for his writing. He was too much the old-fashioned "technology will cure all our ills" kind of thinker for me.

While I certainly don't think anyone should be forced out of the closet, except in the case of political hypocrites, I do think it is pretty small for a famous, successful gay person to remain closetted. They deny young gay people the positive role models they so desperately need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galledgoblin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. I had no idea
that he was gay.

I hope remaining closeted didn't cause him too much distress. it's a shame that someone so visionary and imaginative could not see enough of a welcome in reality to comfortably come out.

“Never come out of the closet, even if you have nothing to lose.”
is this real? I've only ever heard the first three rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laughing Mirror Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. When you consider the fate of Clarke's contemporary Alan Turing ("known homosexual") ...
It gives you a better understanding of maybe why Clarke chose to move far away from Merry Ole England and keep the door to his closet closed shut.

http://www.lambda.net/~maximum/turing.html

Alan Turing the Security Risk

Throughout his professional career, Turing was a "known homosexual". He was put under surveillance at Manchester University because it was believed that his homosexuality made him a security risk. In the early half of the 1950's, McCarthyism (named for Sen. Joseph McCarthy - R. Wisconsin) was in full bloom in America. The loyalties of government officials and careers were ruined in a political campaign that would mark one of the ugliest chapters in the nation's history. The witch hunts crossed national boundaries. America pressured the British government to rid their intelligence establishment of security risks - including homosexuals.

The Persecution of Alan Turing

In 1952, Turing's home was burglarized by a friend of a man with whom he was having an affair. Refusing to be intimidated, he reported the crime. During the investigation, he did not hide his homosexuality from the police. He was labeled a pervert and was charged with gross indecency. He agreed to submit to hormone treatments rather than go to prison. He was injected with the female hormone estrogen. It was believed that estrogen injections were useful in curbing sexual urges.

The stress and humiliation of his treatment at the hands of the government that he served loyally throughout his life led to his mental deterioration. Alan Mathison Turing committed suicide by eating an apple laced with cyanide in 1954. He was 41 years old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. I think this is unfair.
While it may be appropriate to pass judgment on modern gay celebrities for their unwillingness to come out of the closet, it's an entirely different matter for those of Mr. Clarke's era. He grew up in a day when gays faced serious persecution and the loss of all status and opportunity. Homosexuality was almost universally held to be an aberration worthy of shame and derision. That deeply ingrained mentality and the fear it inspired in gay youth had to be extremely difficult to overcome. Admire those who did overcome it, but have some sympathy for the ones who were never able to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. I think you do him a disservice
He never denied being gay; he merely never admitted to it. His sexuality has been an open secret for decades, and all he's ever said about it has been, "My private life is private." Given the culture that shaped him as a child, as a military man and as a scientist, any other attitude would be astonishingly remarkable.

You say that his novels never presented a future that included gay people. It would be just as accurate to say that his novels never presented a future that included straight people either. Clarke did not write about human interrelations with one another, he focused instead on human interrelations with technology. Where personal lives were added to a story, they were just as likely to be unconventional -- characters in "Imperial Earth" and "The Deep Range" were involved in bisexual polyamorous relationships, although this was mentioned only in passing. The only time blatantly heterosexual sex made its way into a Clarke novel was the abominable "Return to Rama" series, written by Gentry Lee with Clarke only offering ideas.

Your obit was good, but I think you did him a disservice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swimmernsecretsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Just to be clear, I didn't write the obit.
It's the work of a blogger, and I found it during a search. Here is the proper credit, also noted in my original:

By GERALD JONAS and THE GAY RECLUSE
Published: March 18, 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Oops, sorry about that
Then the original blogger did him a disservice. My bad. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swimmernsecretsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #15
25. Not to worry, and thanks for posting.
I always enjoy your words and intellect.

I wish a more eloquent obituary had indeed been written, but I wanted to start a discussion topic. Maybe not the best choice, but there it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anser Donating Member (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. Boo
Clarke is a hero of mine.

His sexuality makes no difference to his amazingly forward thinking mind, so rare in our world.

To the writer of that obit: What have you added to the store of human knowledge, to our vision of the future and the universe? I doubt very much. You are in no position to questions Clarke's courage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ordr Donating Member (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
16. I had no clue that he was gay.
RIP, Mr Clarke. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
17. I am sad that another of the Golden Age giants is gone.
Is anyone left except Pohl?

I did not know he was gay, but then again I cannot claim to have followed his life closely - I prefer more character-oriented science fiction.

Many thanks for what he has given us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. He is the last of the ABCs of the genre
Asimov, Bradbury and Clarke. Read them, and you have read the founders of science fiction literature. Not that there weren't other greats: Pohl, Bradley, Le Guin, Roddenberry, Heinlein, Norton, Chalker, del Rey, Foster, Mc Caffrey, Niven, even Poe and Lovecraft. But the ABCs defined what "science fiction" really means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Gotta voice a slight disagreement
It doesn't come out as nice alphabetically, but Heinlein needs to be in the group that "defined what 'science fiction' really means." (And perhaps Bradbury removed, but that's a different argument. ;) )

Quibble aside, nice to meet you! Perhaps you might help me with reading matter? - most of my favorite authors are gone, not very prolific, or not consistent in producing things I like to read.

I like Pohl, Spider Robinson (Kim Stanley is OK too, but not someone I reread a lot), Heinlein, Asimov, some Silverberg (is he still alive?), Octavia Butler (whom I discovered just after her death), McIntyre (especially her dead-on Heinlein-style juvenile, _Barbary_), most Sturgeon.

I like character-based science fiction with a lot of moral questions in it. Can you recommend (if you would care to) any authors not on my list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Have you ever read Steve Perry?
Edited on Wed Mar-19-08 11:43 AM by TechBear_Seattle
He has done a lot of franchise fiction, particularly with Conan, Star Wars and Alien.

In particular, though, I would recommend his "Matador" series": The Man Who Never Missed, Matadora, The Machiavelli Interface, The 97th Step, The Albino Knife, Black Steel, Brother Death and The Musashi Flex. The series is set in a future world with a number of human settled planets and "wheel worlds," which are large, politically independent space stations. It centers on how one man, Emile Antoon Khadaji, sets himself up as a single man fighting against the Confederation (or ConFed), theoretically democratic but in reality fascist and corrupt. They go in and out of print, so check used bookstores first.

Added links.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Hooray!
No, I have not read him, and he sounds right up my alley! Many thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swimmernsecretsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I thank you for the tip as well.
I haven't been reading much lately, and would like to start again. There's a great SF/Fantasy/Horror bookstore in San Francisco called Borderlands, and hopefully they'll have something by him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. Woo hoo!
I'm halfway through 97th Step (which I believe is the first book), and it is wonderful. Many, many thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
19. I've loved his work for 40 years without knowing his sexuality....it really doesn't matter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
23. Well, reading that was a waste of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
26. I never had any idea Clarke was gay! That might explain..


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
27. he was a man of his generation
I don't fault him RIP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC