Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What purpose is served by embracing an identity as a gay person?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:36 PM
Original message
What purpose is served by embracing an identity as a gay person?
And I don't really mean coming out of the closet as such. I mean, in terms of this -

It's sometimes said among people in non-Western cultures that gays exist only in the West or America. Assuming these people who hold that perception are not just repeating what they've been taught, why do they say that? I mean, can it be true that in their own countries there really are no openly gay people? Do gays in other countries find socially acceptable ways to accommodate their homosexual needs without feeling alienated from their culture? Just about any man can tell you that though some people may be asexual, over 99% of men MUST have an outlet for their sexual energy.

Just wanted to raise that issue to see what people have to say. Hope that made sense. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. in every human culture. period nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. For an answer go to the IGLHRC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks for the link. Very interesting site. Would like to contribute
to them, as it does work I value, and I've known gays from all over the world who successfully received asylum out of reasonable fear of persecution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Generally when you hear that gays "don't exist" in a country...
That means "we kill them to make sure it stays that way."

Now when people say that there were no "homosexuals" or "heterosexuals" until the late 19th century that's because it wasn't a medical/psychological category of being until then. It is important to remember though that until the Enlightenment, there wasn't any great obsession with taxonomies. Biology was just taking flight.

It's not that everyone was straight until the 19th century or that sex was considered just another 'behavior'--it's that gender itself was different. There were eunuchs as well as intersexual people were not surgically "corrected" at birth (there are 5 corrective vaginoplasties performed on AISD children every day) so male and female was more perceived as a continuum than two separate planets that shared nothing in common. Third genders were more common, or at least less pathologized, in antiquity. Gender was thought to cause sex, not the other way around. In other words, if a girl engaged in masculine habits, she might produce a penis. Medical cases of women spontaneously sprouting penises existed (of course, these girls were intersexed.)

Some context
http://www.docfilm.com/mexfilms/muxes/indexF.htm?muxes.htm&down
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijra_(South_Asia)

Also check out the books "The Spirit and the Flesh" as well as "Female Husbands and Boy Wives: African Homosexualities"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canis_lupus Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. The definition of 'gay' is sometimes fluid from culture to culture
The classic example is ancient Greece where older males were expected to take younger males under their wing for a period of time and woo them with gifts. The youth responded by offering the older male his body to use sexually. While the sexual behavior they engaged in would likely be labeled "gay" today, the Greeks had no concept of what we call "gay" today.

Or, for a more modern example, in some Latino cultures a man can engage in sex with another male and still be considered "straight" as long as he is only the insertive partner. To be the receptive partner is considered to be maricone. It may be the same behavior gay men engage in, but the culture does not perceive it that way.

To some extent, a portion of the population has always engaged in same-sex behavior, but it wasn't until the late 19th century when the labels of "heterosexual" and "homosexual" were developed that same-sex oriented people began to see their orientation as an identity and not just a behavior. The idea of a gay identity and gay community first caught on in the West and that is where the concept of "gay" is strongest. Other countries and cultures do not share the same view of identity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. Are you gay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yes, thank God!
And I wouldn't have it any other way. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. they mean we have a gay culture and other societies dont
eastern societies are typically collectivist and not individualistic. that means that people try not to stick out at all. having a gay identity would make you stick out and its far more avoided in the east than the west.

so gay people in the east are closeted and have dual lives typically.

i think as long as you fit in collectivistic cultures are great, there is far more of a social network and closer ties in families etc. however for those of labelled 'misfits' an individualistic culture, with all its problems, is a far better option

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Very nicely said, priyanka!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC