Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Even Low Tobacco Smoke Exposure Is Risky

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
Elmore Furth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 09:58 AM
Original message
Even Low Tobacco Smoke Exposure Is Risky
Second had smoke exposure has shown deleterious health effects to such an extent that public-health bans on smoking. Low level exposure to cigarette smoke leads to higher incidence of lung diseases such as emphysema and even lung cancer. But the biological mechanism was never clear -- until now.

Apparently there are significant genetic changes that occur in lung tissue even with low levels of tobacco smoke exposure.



Aug. 20, 2010 -- Even low levels of tobacco smoke exposure pose a risk to lung health, triggering potentially hazardous genetic changes, according to a new study.

The hazards of secondhand smoke have been known for years, says researcher Ronald Crystal, MD, chief of the division of pulmonary and critical care medicine at New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center and chair of genetic medicine at Weill Cornell Medical College, New York. ''But there were never any studies that had looked at the biology, why this is the case."

His study does that, demonstrating that even the lowest levels of smoke exposure lead to genetic changes at the cellular level in the lungs. "What this study shows is, if we could detect nicotine in the urine, we could also detect changes in the number of genes turned on and off'' in the cells of the lungs, Crystal tells WebMD.

The new findings put ''scientific teeth" behind the epidemiological evidence that smoke exposure even at low levels is hazardous, says Zab Mosenifar, MD, a pulmonologist, director of the Women's Lung Institute, and executive vice-chair of the department of medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, who reviewed the study findings for WebMD.



Even Low Tobacco Smoke Exposure Is Risky



These researchers removed airway cells from the volunteers using a bronchoscope and tested all 25,000 identified human genes in them to determine which ones were active — either turned on or off — in response to cigarettes. They narrowed the search to 372 genes that were active among the smokers but not in the cells of the nonsmokers. Based on the level of nicotine in the urine, the scientists also divided the volunteers into three groups: smokers, who showed the highest level of the tobacco metabolites; nonsmokers, who showed none of these compounds and a low-exposure group who fell in between. Comparing the 372 genes among these three groups, they found that the low-exposure group shared 34% of the same active genes with nonsmokers and 11% of the same gene activity with smokers. The low-exposure group included both nonsmokers who have never lit up as well as those who admitted to smoking only occasionally.

It's not clear how permanent these genetic changes are, but previous data suggests that, at least in smokers, some of the alterations may be irreversible.

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2012103,00.html#ixzz0xFimVJkb


How Secondhand Cigarette Smoke Changes Your Genes

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Life is risky. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Good one!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-10 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. Nah - it's all in our minds
Edited on Tue Aug-24-10 10:25 AM by dmallind
Decades of smoke-filled public rooms are only a problem to whiny health nazis...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-10 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. This ought to get some sort of Obviousman award. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. if true...my whole genration would already be dead.
Every baby boomer I know grew up with parents smoking in the kitchen, living room and the car with the windows rolled up in the winter...pleeeeeeeaaaaassse...we'd all be fucking dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. How does "risky" equate with being dead??
Sure I grew up around some smoke in the house. I'm glad the house was a bit leaky. And, no, I am not dead. That doesn't have anything to do with whether second hand smoke is risky or not. In fact, the science says that it is. The science does NOT say that every person who grew up with second hand smoke will be dead in their 60s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Who's science?
There are studies and then there are "studies".

Lots of $$$$ in that suing Big Tobacco pot.

Smoking yes...no argument here...you get what you deserve...but someone smelled the jackpot with this second hand bullshit.....the whole world was exposed to second hand smoke at one time or another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Can you fathom this?
Small amount of second hand smoke=small risk
Large amount of second hand smoke=bigger risk
Smoking=largest risk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC