|
(and please note, I'm posting this as only my opinion - I think in order to make inroads with RW religious people you have to first commit to understanding them)
Hard times and personal troubles make many people psychologically receptive to a message of hope and a better way of living. Religion is the de facto bearer of such messages. (Naturally, there can be quite a difference between the message and the reality.)
But almost any organized group that claims they have truth to dispense and balm for what ails you will find a listening ear among the downtrodden. This goes for political groups as well as religious. Put your trust in Jesus, or put it in A.N.S.W.E.R., I sometimes don't see a huge difference when the organization to which you give your allegiance is hawking a fiercely-defended set of dogmas. This is as good an argument as any for all of us to keep an open mind, even as we rightly defend our politics.
Now, with regard to your conclusion, the idea that rightwing religious leaders actually like poverty and hardship among their followers doesn't ring true with the psychology underlying religious conversion. If people don't see their lives improving after following a religion, sooner or later, they are going to find something else that does deliver the goods (no pun intended). Religious rapture is one thing, but having velveeta in the fridge when the kids are hungry is another. Also, many RW religious believe that God rewards good works. Again, if you are poor, and you join a church, and you start tithing or at least hitting the collection plate, and doing other things that cost some $$ in pursuit of your religion, sooner or later you're going to ask yourself, ok, what's in this for me? If life sucks either way, might as well stay home on Sundays.
Furthermore, I've noticed that churches often help out their own when one of their members hits a rough spot. My guess is this charity also comes with some admonitions about how to get out of the jam, and make some changes so it doesn't happen again. Naturally, charity (whether internal or external) requires the church to have some disposable money. Churches don't hate money. Quite the opposite.
Bottom line is that many RW churches encourage less-destructive lifestyles, and so, provide a net improvement in the fortunes of their members. This reinforces desire to stay affiliated. Even when this doesn't happen, many churches provide an extra layer of safety net. Neither of these seem compatible with the idea of manipulated poverty.
Just my $0.02 worth.
Peace.
|