Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Teen Video Tapes Traffic Stop Charged By Police With Felony Wiretapping

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Civil Liberties Donate to DU
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 09:27 PM
Original message
Teen Video Tapes Traffic Stop Charged By Police With Felony Wiretapping
Video recording leads to felony charge

The Patriot-News
Posted by Matt Miller
June 11, 2007 08:51AM

Brian D. Kelly didn't think he was doing anything illegal when he used his videocamera to record a Carlisle police officer during a traffic stop. Making movies is one of his hobbies, he said, and the stop was just another interesting event to film. Now he's worried about going to prison or being burdened with a criminal record.

Kelly, 18, of Carlisle, was arrested on a felony wiretapping charge, with a penalty of up to 7 years in state prison. His camera and film were seized by police during the May 24 stop, he said, and he spent 26 hours in Cumberland County Prison until his mother posted her house as security for his $2,500 bail.

Kelly is charged under a state law that bars the intentional interception or recording of anyone's oral conversation without their consent. The criminal case relates to the sound, not the pictures, that his camera picked up. "I didn't think I could get in trouble for that," Kelly said. "I screwed up, yeah. I know now that I can't do that. I just don't see how something like this should affect my entire life."

Whether that will happen could be determined during Kelly's preliminary hearing before District Judge Jessica Brewbaker in July. No one seems intent on punishing him harshly. "Obviously, ignorance of the law is no defense," District Attorney David Freed said. "But often these cases come down to questions of intent."


*** - Just how stupid can this law be? What about the public's right to know WTF its police are doing while on the public payroll?!?!?! And according to the">Court of Appeals , the police have no expectation of privacy while carrying out their public duties!!!

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess this means it is a "wire tapping" violation when the police
film with their dash board cameras. I know that no traffic cop ever asked my permission while stopping me for speeding.

And they wonder why kids don't respect police officers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. If challenged it seems that law would fall hard
There is no "reasonable expectation of privacy" for anyone concerned. Now, what was the officer doing while videotaped?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. According to the kid....
..mostly cursing him out from what it sounds like. That and the SEVEN police cars that showed up to arrest him. Sheesh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Okiegal123 Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. That is a tragedy; however, read this..
I ask where are the checks and balances for public officials....... and when has it become a crime to complain on an officer and/or video an incident as you spoke of.......

Article published May 10, 2007
Poland woman will fight perjury charges in Okla.
By Jodi Belgard
(318) 487-6344
LaTisha White is familiar with sheriff's deputies.
The 32-year-old Poland resident and paralegal sees them every day.

But Wednesday, the Rapides Parish Sheriff's deputy that entered her office wasn't there for routine paperwork.

He was there for her.

Listed as felon
White is registered on the FBI's National Crime Information Center's database as a wanted felon on perjury charges for an incident that occurred in Carter County, Okla., in September 2006. This information is sent to all law enforcement agents. It also triggers a red flag when the listed person's driver's license or state identification card is run.
That means a routine traffic stop could land White in jail awaiting extradition to Oklahoma, where the maximum sentence for felony perjury is five years in a state penitentiary.

Rapides Parish District Attorney James "Jam" Downs said the deputy used "good sense" and did not arrest White.

Nature of charges
"You always have to look at the nature of the charges -- how high is your alert?," Down said.
The felony perjury charges were brought against White after she filed a complaint to the Oklahoma Highway Patrol regarding trooper Rocky Northcutt after a routine traffic stop.

Northcutt is a 1998 recipient of the State of Oklahoma Trooper of the Year award. He also earned a heroism award for a 1997 incident that left him wounded and one man dead.

White said Northcutt, after running her off the road in pursuit of her sister Stormy Knight's vehicle, used foul language, including "the F word," in front of her mother and two daughters who were 10 and 13 at the time.

"I called and spoke to his (Northcutt's) supervisor, and he told me to fill out a form, have it notarized, and sent it back. I did exactly what they told me to do," White said, adding that she didn't think the issue would be pressed any further.

But Carter County District Attorney Craig Ladd charged White after reviewing Northcutt's patrol tape.

Ladd admits White is "probably the only" individual to be prosecuted for felony perjury after making a civil complaint.

But, based on the tape, Ladd felt he had no other option.

'Crystal clear'
"It was crystal clear," Ladd said. "We realized what she claimed happened did not happen."
White's attorney, Miles Johnson, also reviewed the tape.

"They sent me two tapes, which were obviously redacted," Johnson said.

Ladd did not comment on the length of the tapes.

Ladd initially offered White a deferred prosecution agreement, which carried the penalty of a $520 fine, 100 hours of community service and a letter of apology to Northcutt -- an agreement Johnson said Ladd made sound like a "favor."

Johnson believes Ladd abused his discretion with his decision to prosecute White.

"The law's right, but the way he's applying it is wrong," Johnson said. "This is absolutely absurd and so far out of the ethical bounds it's ridiculous. (White) is a mother of two who works hard -- with no prior convictions."

And White continues to stand by her statement.

"I will forever believe that this man said this in front of myself, my children and my mother," White said. "The truth is the truth, and you're not supposed to be scared to tell the truth."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 03rd 2022, 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Civil Liberties Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC