Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court: Cloaking justice

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Civil Liberties Donate to DU
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 06:33 AM
Original message
Supreme Court: Cloaking justice

Are children now at more risk?

Seattle PI

Yes, says Washington Supreme Court Justice Barbara Madsen in her dissenting opinion in a case involving teachers and allegations of sexual misconduct. "I'm just deeply troubled, given the nature of these allegations," she said.

The tension between individual privacy and public transparency is a worthy balance. But last week's court ruling threw a cloak over the scales of justice.

Madsen's dissent gets it right: "The material in a teacher's file relating to allegations of sexual misconduct involving students is not information that is protected by the right of privacy.

"It does not pertain to the intimate details of one's personal and private life but is instead information about alleged specific instances of misconduct occurring in the course of the teacher's performance of his or her public duties – a kind of information that this court has specifically identified as not encompassed by the right of privacy."

What's particularly unfortunate about this decision is that the Legislature already weighed in on the side of transparency. The court essentially failed to account for existing law, with two privacy standards: first, highly offensive to a reasonable person, and, more important, "not of legitimate concern to the public."
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. (shrug) Unsubstantiated charges aren't available to the public. A 6-3 vote....
The other 3 women on the court agreed were on the majority.

For a more... um... complete description of what took place, one can see:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008085449_teachers010.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. How will the 'secret deals' receive exposure?
Schools cut secret deals with abusive teachers
Feb. 18, 2008

Oregon Live

They call it “passing the trash,” and it’s a common policy that lets child abusers resign and move to another district

It would take months for the agency that licenses Oregon teachers to discipline a Salem-area teacher for inappropriately touching at least eight girls.

To get Kenneth John Cushing, then 44, away from Claggett Creek Middle School students immediately, administrators cut him a deal: If Cushing resigned, they would conceal his alleged conduct — clutching students’ waists, touching their buttocks and massaging their shoulders — from the public.

Cushing signed the pact — obtained by The Oregonian through public records requests — with Salem-Keizer Public Schools in 2004, and officials promised not to reveal the teacher’s behavior if potential employers called looking for a reference. They would attribute his departure to “personal reasons,” the document reads, and make “no reference to this agreement.”

...

During the past five years, nearly half of Oregon teachers disciplined for sexual misconduct with a child left their school districts with confidential agreements. Most, like Cushing’s, promised to keep alleged abuse quiet. Some promised cash settlements, health insurance and letters of recommendation as incentives for a resignation.

The practice is so widespread, school officials across the country call it “passing the trash.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Uh.... another STATE?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Its national.
Sex misconduct by teachers weighed

The Associated Press

Heeding a steady drumbeat of sexual misconduct cases involving teachers, at least 15 states are now considering stronger oversight and tougher punishment for educators who take advantage of their students.

Lawmakers say they are concerned about an increasingly well-documented phenomenon: While the vast majority of America's teachers are committed professionals, there also is a persistent problem with sexual misconduct in U.S. schools. When abuse happens, administrators too often fail to let others know about it, and too many legal loopholes let offenders stay in the classroom.

Advocates include governors, education superintendents and legislative leaders.

...

The ideas emerging in state capitals come at a time when U.S. media have been reporting steadily on individual cases, along with more in-depth examinations of the problem.

A nationwide Associated Press investigation published in October found 2,570 educators whose teaching credentials were revoked, denied, surrendered or sanctioned from 2001 through 2005 following allegations of sexual misconduct. Experts who track sexual abuse say those cases are representative of a much deeper problem because of underreporting.

...

In eight states, leaders pushing changes said the AP investigation had inspired their proposals. Others said they had grown concerned from individual cases of abuse in their states, or other news reports that looked at the problem locally or in their state.

...

Several states are tackling a major problem — the loopholes that allow problem teachers to move from one school district to another, or from one state to another. The AP investigation found that what education officials commonly call "passing the trash" happens when districts allow a teacher to quietly leave a school, or fail to report problems to state authorities, or fail to check with state authorities before hiring a teacher, among other glitches.

In eight states, legislators are pursuing changes to close those gaps, including California, Colorado, Florida, Minnesota, Missouri, Virginia, Washington state and West Virginia.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. What the Washington Supreme Court says is NOT national.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. In response to the "ANOTHER State" reply, 'passing the trash' is a national problem. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. (shrug) Cops would have a much easier time dealing with criminals if cops were allowed....
to violate people's civil rights too.

Damn authoritarians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. What's your solution to 'passing the trash'? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. So I have to solve all of the country's ills, or else admit that we should give up our civil rights?
Not.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Right. 'We' have not witnessed ANY lost of civil rights in the past 8 years. Good Day. nt
:dilemma:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Civil Liberties Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC