Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

First in-depth account of scheme to engineer with atom bombs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 01:12 PM
Original message
First in-depth account of scheme to engineer with atom bombs
http://www.sciencenewsdaily.org/story-9083.html

What would you think if someone told you that not so long ago, the U.S. government, led by gung-ho scientists, seriously considered exploding 300 or more atomic bombs to blast a sea-level canal in Panama? Or up to 764 in northern Colombia?

Excavating a nuclear canal through the Central American isthmus would have required 20,000 times the explosive energy of the atomic bomb that shattered Hiroshima, engineers estimated.

You'd think that someone was kidding, right?

But that's just what government scientists hoped to do. They also came close to detonating a nuclear device in the early 1960s in the pristine northwest corner of Alaska near Point Barrow to "build" a harbor.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Edward Teller
Edward Teller I presume had a serious guilt complex over the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings. He was nuts about expanding atomic weapons into civil engineering to improve society. This is nothing new though, we've known about this for decades. Carl Sagan and Richard Feynman both wrote about Teller as did many other scientists. This is just the first book to tie it all together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I had lunch with Teller once... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Chinese actually did some test projects like that
It didn't work very well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here is a list of every nuclear test from 1962-1992, radioisotope release,
Edited on Thu Dec-15-05 10:13 PM by NNadir
etc, etc.

All of the bomb tests listed as "Plowshares" were attempts to find civil engineering "uses" for nuclear weapons.

I count 25 of these tests. Many were conducted away from the Nevada test site. The first test of this type, the Sedan test in 1962, created the largest man made crater in history and released 15 million curies of radioactive fission products into the atmosphere. The cloud wafted over much of Nevada, California, Utah and Arizona.

http://www.lanl.gov/history/hbombon/pdf/Radiological%20Effluents%20Released%20from%20U.S.%20Continental%20Tests,%201961%20Through%201992.pdf

Actually the only possible civilian use for nuclear weapons is to fission their cores in nuclear reactors. In fact it is both necessary and important to do this.

The only place where nuclear weapons were actually used for engineering projects was in the former Soviet Union.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here are some uses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC