Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An alternative to rent control

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Poverty Donate to DU
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 08:13 PM
Original message
An alternative to rent control
Instead of trying to directly control monthly rental fees, why not offer subsidies to owners of future affordable residential units that are currently not residential or that have not yet been built?

The owner of a unit will receive subsidy money associated with a given unit only while the unit is actually being rented as a residence. So there will be an incentive to create affordable units that people actually want to rent and to make potential renters aware of the units.

People need to eat. There are farm subsidies. Are retail food prices regulated in the USA?
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Big Kahuna Donating Member (903 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. My experience has been that no one gives a shit about renters...
Democrat or Republican.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
oscar111 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Progressive dems care.. DINO's may not,
you are right there.

Progressive dems care. Huey Long ended the practice of selling farms at auctions if the owner was too poor to pay land tax. Grapes of Wrath showed how it was before... bulldozing the home.

That step by a p. dem, saved many a home for farmers.

listen to the George Mason U. site voice clip of huey long.. might be in the History Project website.. not sure where i heard it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Betsy Ross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think you are talking about Section 8 housing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't think I am talking about Section 8 housing
"A family that is issued a housing voucher is responsible for finding a suitable housing unit of the family's choice where the owner agrees to rent under the program."

Source:
http://www.hud.gov/about/section8.cfm

I am suggesting that:

1. The renter wouldn't need a voucher.
2. The owner would apply for the subsidy.
3. The subsidy would not apply to already existing residential units.

Also, the program would probably be more expensive than the current section 8 system and it would become more expensive as more subsidized units are created. However, just as there are jobs related to farming, there are jobs related to housing: maintenance, security, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Robson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. The problem is......
In years past poverty and crime were not as connected at the hip as they are now. In the Great Depression people were poor, but they didn't accept and tolerate the criminal activity that often accompanies poor (especially urban) today. My experience has been that Section 8 housing almost always results in increases in criminal activity, and often significant increases in such activity. That's a major reason why many oppose Section 8 in their community. I agree with some that there has been a breakdown in family that has been a major factor in this. Young children must be taught values of respect and love very early on, and they aren't getting that in far too many cases. The problem is how to correct it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WestSeattle2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm totally ignorant about rent control....
What was the intent? Has it worked? What are the downsides? I've only heard of rent control used in New York, is that true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "What are the downsides?"
Edited on Tue Mar-21-06 10:04 PM by Boojatta
Theoretically, one would expect rent control to reduce the incentive for future creation of residential units. If we forecast a weakening of future supply of residential units for rent, then we also forecast an increase in future rental costs. Those who have rent controlled housing would be partly or totally protected from these increases in rental costs, but we would expect other renters to face higher rental costs. We would also expect there to be extremely low vacancy rates.

The analysis of detailed statistical information would probably not make for a very lively forum thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. While many have benefited
They were not necessarily always those who needed it. There is no means testing so in NYC and elsewhere there are a number poster children for the anti rent control faction.

Clearly affordable rental housing is dwindling, esp in the larger cities. In a capitalist system, we need incentives to insure it remains. Right now the general approach is the stick, not carrot, and unsurprisingly in the long run that has proved to be counter productive.

Something needs to be done, but no one seems to have a viable approach yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. A simpler idea: treat income received from renting out affordable
residential units the way that capital gains are treated. In other words, reduce the income tax payable on that kind of income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. Low-Income Housing Tax Credit
Maybe you mean a program like this one...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-Income_Housing_Tax_Credit
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. The article says
The imputed income an owner receives from an investment in owner-occupied housing has always escaped taxation (...)

Is that true? That seems rather odd. What's the point in having public school teachers praise the risk-reducing benefits of diversifying an investment portfolio if tax law creates an incentive for many people to concentrate a large percentage of their savings in one particular asset?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Also from the article
The LIHTC directly subsidizes the development costs of low-income housing. To qualify, a project must sign a Land Use Restriction Agreement (LURA) guaranteeing a minimum of 15 years with either:

At least 20 % or more of the residential units in the development are both rent restricted and occupied by individuals whose income is 50 % or less of the area median gross income
At least 40 % or more of the residential units in the development are both rent restricted and occupied by individuals whose income is 60 % or less of the area median gross income

What if an individual's income varies? If there is a long waiting period, then might some people who are unable to maintain fairly constant income levels experience a temporary income fluctuation that will disqualify them?

Among all individuals who qualify, how do they select the individuals who will get an opportunity to rent units at restricted rent levels?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
oscar111 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
11. Nationalize all housing
end all landlording. LL's are an unplesant presence in the nerves of renters.

we must eventually end LLing.

if we want a good mental state for the poor.

Nationalize, then place ownership in the hands of the residents of housing.

pay the mom and pop LL's for the housing's value, so they dont suffer.. they are often ok folks. Well, sometimes maybe LOL they are nice.

PS "the rentier class" is another term for ll's you might see here and there.

LL's are a very bad idea when you design a society from scratch. No sane person would invent them in his effort to design a good society.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. How could your idea be tested? It sounds like a unique event rather than
something that could be gradually introduced.

If people were given warning, then would you expect some renters to get loans and rent luxury accommodations? Typically, if a particular hypothetical future event would be good, then do you expect advance notice of the event to be good, bad, or neutral?

Nationalize, then place ownership in the hands of the residents of housing.

When young adults wanted to move from college dorms or from the homes of their parents, would they need enough money to buy a home?

Suppose you were offered six months of work, a thousand miles from where you currently live. If you wanted to accept the job offer, then would you need to buy a home close to the job? If there were lots of homes for sale near the job, but few buyers, then would you reject the job offer because of the risk of owning a home you couldn't sell?

Would people inherit housing? Who would get ownership when the current resident dies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
anewdeal Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Stealing would work for one generation
but what would provide incentives for housing to be provided for the poor later on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
oscar111 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. HUEY LONG SPEAKS on housing, etc
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5109

try this.. a recording of the great man himself. Riviting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
16. Thread kick to emphasize a point already made and to give easy access
to a thread about a topic that is currently being discussed elsewhere on DU.

A point already made that I think deserves emphasis:

A simpler idea: treat income received from renting out affordable
residential units the way that capital gains are treated. In other words, reduce the income tax payable on that kind of income.

Note: the preferential tax treatment could help make some individuals wealthy. It would reward individuals who contribute to solving the problem of affordable housing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
charleslb Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. An Alternative to Capitalism
What we the people need to do is to start working on an alternative to capitalism, and pronto!

http://www.thetotalrevolutionproject.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Poverty Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC