Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ubuntu's "nedit" build seems broken

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Computers & Internet » Open Source and Free Software Group Donate to DU
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 03:50 AM
Original message
Ubuntu's "nedit" build seems broken
Anyone here use NEDIT for text editing? I've been using it for a long time. I very much enjoy the Linux way of doing things, but I've never understood the allure of emacs or vi. Maybe it's a problem with me, but I just don't understand why something that is conceptually so simple as text editing should be so confusing. That's why I've long used NEDIT for editing code. It's simple, and gets the job done.

Until recently. The NEDIT package in the latest Ubuntu release (Kooky Koala, or something. I can't remember these nicknames) is a nightmare. I'm still using it daily, but it is getting to be a pain in the butt.

I can't remember all the little annoyances. But one is trying to search in a newly-opened file. The search dialog will not receive input unless you've actively clicked in the editor window, before beginning your search.

The current NEDIT build seems seriously broken to me. Maybe I should try gedit instead. I hate the crappy Motif GUI anyway.

Is anyone familiar with what I speak?
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. I haven't used that one ...

... so I can't say.

However, I too am lacking the gene that makes one a fan of vi. I do like a highly modified emacs, but not so much for simple editing tasks.

I usually use pico or nano. Have you tried either of these?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I used to use pico...
When I had a shell account on the university computer. This was in the very early '90's. I may've had a 14k modem at the time. It worked surprisingly well, but I haven't thought about that editor in a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Nano is pico ...

FWIW ...

It's replacement for pico with extended functionality, e.g. search and replace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. thanks!
I'll take a look. Should be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Karmic Koala isn't due for release until October: only alpha versions are available now
Are you actually using Karmic or are you using Jaunty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. is that really the name of the next release?
Edited on Sun Jul-26-09 04:04 AM by Syrinx
I thought I made it up! :shrug:

EDIT: Oh, you said "Karmic." Well, I guessed the correct animal, anyway. :)

I'm actually currently using "jaunty jackalope."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Computers & Internet » Open Source and Free Software Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC