|
I had my last class on healing and brought up an issue which has left me questioning if there is a right or wrong way to do healing.
It was a small class, and at the end, we would take turns doing some hands on healing of each other. We were to make statements as we sent the healing like, "You are loved", "God loves you", or whatever else arose in our minds.
I personally found this disruptive for me in sending the healing as I was too busy thinking of things to say. I found that visualizing my subject WELL and FEELING their emotional joy worked better. In fact, when I did it my own way, I felt like I was slightly out of my body and floating a few inches off of the floor.
I finally brought this up, and asked if it was okay to do in a way which felt right for me. I explained that having to make statements was getting in the way of sending the healing or even receiving it. I would tune everyone out when I was a recipient as I was too aware as to who was saying what, and when sending the healing I was wondering what to say next. I explained that I was possibly too visual, and wanted to send the utmost healing possible. I tried to be kind as I explained that I was too much in "thinking" mode on what to say next to be of the maximum benefit to my recipient. Let me just state again, that this is just ME.
One teacher explained that possibly the person had never heard the phrases before and it was beneficial for them to hear them. I did not want to argue, of course. I grew up in such a household myself, but the auditory portion was still disruptive (to me) and I would rather EXPERIENCE the healing than hear some phrases.
When it came time for me to sit in the chair and receive...I told them they did not need to speak to be effective...I would FEEL it. I left it up to them individually to decide how they wanted to send the healing.
I might have stepped on some toes bringing up the issue, but being told we NEEDED to speak for the benefit of the recipient caused me to find my voice.
I must have been the only visual person there as nobody backed me up, but I was not doing it for others...I only wanted to be effective in what I was doing.
My gut tells me it depends on the person doing the healing and what feels right for THEM to be effective. Or does it depend on what the person receiving the healing modalities are?
For instance: If you TELL me directions, I will not know what you are talking about....if you draw me a map, I will understand....or if you give me visual clues to turn right at the BP Station and left at the 7-11, I will be able to follow your instructions.
Anyway, it was the last class, so I brought up the issue of how to do distant healing for a friend or loved one, or healing for an area (like Katrina), or a nation, or the planet as a whole, since we had not covered it thus far.
The main teacher then took us on a meditative trip to healing people and areas, and I sent healing to our entire group here among other areas which needed healing. Since it was never covered, I had thought people would come and thank me for bringing it up, but they did not. Not that I need thanking for it....I am just happy they learned the tools to do so. I know there will be a loved one down the road in another city who will be able to receive the healing, and that is enough for me. They know how to convey it to our nation and planet now, and that was my goal. I guess the last part in questioning the methodology of auditory vs visualization put people off.
Is there a right way to do this? I find myself second guessing myself.
|