|
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 04:23 PM by Warpy
in any area where a double blind study was taking place on sick people, the new drug versus an old line drug. We had to keep reminding them to report anything that felt different to them while they were on the study and had to report every belch and fart. Then there were the metabolic studies with the blood sugar tests every 5 minutes...yeah, we put a line in for those so we didn't have to keep stabbing their fingers.
Trust me, all that stuff didn't just go into some circular file in some flunky's office. It was all tabulated. Some of the belches and farts were random. Some were later listed as side effects of a particular drug if enough patients getting the drug reported them.
The truth is that everybody at every step of the process keeps an eye on people getting any medication both before and after it's approved. Sometimes the extent of adverse effects aren't known until enough patients are taking a drug for it to show up; such was the case with Vioxx and an earlier pain drug, Zomax. Sometimes the drug companies try to cover it up like they did with Vioxx. The consequences usually outweigh the profits, so most of them acquiesce to black box warning labels as soon as a problem becomes known.
People outside the system just have no idea. I guess from a response to one of philb's latest idiocies in "Health," we just have to keep setting the record straight. People out there will listen.
|