Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

800 Nellis maintenance airmen out of a job

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 07:45 AM
Original message
800 Nellis maintenance airmen out of a job
800 Nellis maintenance airmen out of a job
By Bruce Rolfsen - Staff writer
Posted : Friday Feb 15, 2008 7:01:34 EST

About 800 airmen at Nellis Air Force Base, Nev., will have to move to other assignments.

Late Wednesday, Nellis officials announced that the Air Force would turn over most of the 57th Wing’s back shop maintenance duties to private contractors. The work had been done by 793 enlisted airmen, 11 officers and 72 civilians.

Another 310 back shop maintenance positions deemed “military essential” will continue to be filled by airman, Nellis spokeswoman Capt. Jessica Martin said. Also, the change doesn’t affect crew chiefs and others who do most of their work on the flight line and maintainers assigned to the Thunderbirds.

Computer Sciences Corporation Applied Technologies of Fort Worth, Texas, won the contract to do the maintenance, worth up to $207 million over eight years. The firm got the contract after an Air Force review determined that CSC could do the work for less money than airmen and Air Force civilians, a review process known in the Department of Defense as A-76.

Nellis officials expect the transition to contractor maintenance will take about 15 months to complete, Martin said. Airmen will be reassigned to other duties. Air Force civilians losing their jobs can apply for other federal positions, but there are no job guarantees.


Rest of article at: http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2008/02/airforce_nellis_contract_080214w/



uhc comment: If interested, you can read all 63 pages of the A-76 outsourcing document --> http://www.whitehouse.gov/OMB/circulars/a076/a76_rev2003.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. National Security?
Sorry I don't have time to read the articles before replying but it's seems risky and stupid to outsource something critically related to the nation's security to a "for profit" agency that can really screw things up with contract negotiations and cutting costs for even more profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. $207 million over 8 years? Bwahahahahahaha!!!!
Government contracting 101:

1) Hire twice as many people as the DoD used for the same work.
2) Do NOT hire qualified individuals. They will expect to be paid as such. Hire the ex-AF mechanics who were drummed out for drink, drugs and wife-beating, then hold that over their heads to keep them working for less money.
3) Whatever you're paying the workers, charge the government twice as much to cover the administration/billing expenses as well as the CEO's quarterly bonus. Someone's got to pay for the three new vacation homes, his private jet and all those DC hookers, er, Congressmen.
4) Two years into the contract, when the money's all gone, claim change orders, unforseen circumstances, labor and equipment issues and material costs. No worries, they're the U.S. government, they can always print more. And they will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC