Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S., Iraqi officials cite ‘gangs,’ not Mahdi Army, as enemy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:31 AM
Original message
U.S., Iraqi officials cite ‘gangs,’ not Mahdi Army, as enemy
U.S., Iraqi officials cite ‘gangs,’ not Mahdi Army, as enemy
By James Warden, Stars and Stripes
Mideast edition, Monday, April 14, 2008

BAGHDAD — American forces and the Iraqi government are officially resisting any attempts to connect recent fighting to Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army.

Rear Adm. Patrick Driscoll, a Multi-National Force–Iraq spokesman, described a brightening security picture in Basra and Baghdad to a group of reporters in the capital Sunday — initially without any mention of the militant group.

Instead, he said the Americans and Iraqi security forces have been battling “armed criminals” and “gangs” who possess illegal weapons. Driscoll noted that Iraqi Security Forces arrested more than 400 criminals during the fighting, including several death-row convicts at large in Basra.

Since al-Sadr declared a truce with coalition forces last year, the military has taken great pains to distinguish between the mainstream Mahdi Army and breakaway elements that it calls “special groups.”

That view is at odds with many Iraqis, most of whom simply call any Shiite militants Mahdi Army. During last week’s fighting in Shula, for example, informants filled tip lines with information that they’d seen Mahdi Army members amassing in the streets. Iraqi commanders attributed the lull after fighting exploded in March to al-Sadr’s realization that his army was losing. Some Iraqi government officials have even warned the Americans that the distinction between the Mahdi Army and special groups isn’t always so clear.


Rest of article at: http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=54038
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. This belongs on the front page! All of the corporate media is doing it.
They are doing everything possible not to reference Al Sadr and the Mahdi Army. They are being called "militant militias" and every other generic term you can imagine. It is hard to believe that this is an accident and that there is no "order form the top" to do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC