Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Defense Tech: Gettin' Ospreys Dirty

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 05:39 AM
Original message
Defense Tech: Gettin' Ospreys Dirty
Gettin' Ospreys Dirty

There are a couple more things from the MGen. Kelly interview that I wanted to throw out there for you all to ponder.

First, Kelly showered pretty high praise on the MV-22 Osprey in his theater. He added more to the "higher, farther, faster" argument that most proponents (and some reporters like yours truly) say about the bird, and took on the argument that the MV-22 wasn't really tested in the Iraq deployment -- namely because it wasn't dropping into hot LZs.

"When I got there there was some criticism that the airplane was untested and all that and that the Marines are protecting it and the commanders won't let it go into hot LZs," Kelly said. "Well, the fact is, you don't intentionally ever go into a hot LZ. If you go into a hot LZ knowingly, you're probably not playing smart baseball. ... Gen. Odierno and Gen. Petraeus fell in love with it ... because it zips around the way it does it was doing a lot more VIP lifting that I thought it should, so I took it out of the VIP business and got it dirty."

So this is the argument I was bandying around last year when I came back from Iraq (I spent a week with VMM-263 in the first ever Osprey deployment). Kelly understands the logic behind exchanging speed, altitude (and th ability to attain altitude very quickly) and reduced audio signature (he said the aircraft can come down rapidly from 9K feet to a vertical landing with a lot less noise than a CH-46 or 53) with .50cal machine guns. And he knows than when a commander can, he'll try to avoid a hot LZ every time because it ain't like a Phrog or a Shitter can do much better -- they'd be sitting ducks too.

And here's some more he said about the reliability argument:


Rest of article and a spirited discussion at: http://www.defensetech.org/archives/004725.html?wh=wh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeGoodDoGood Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Twentyfive Years ago.......
in the Marine Corps Gazette two AH-1 pilots (both majors) made the point that the Osprey is too fast for AH-1 escort and too slow for AV-8 escorts. And Av-8's are not really suited for escort any way.

So if your CH-53 or CH-46 is slower and more short legged, it is at least compatible with the only reasonable escort. I also understand that due to the flight characteristics, the Osprey settles into the LZ at a constant and predictable rate. That is, you know, practically suicide in a "hot" or contested LZ.

The Osprey will never be suited for anything but admin lifts. Nothing is going to change that.

Walt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC