Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OT: An invitation some will take her up on

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 01:08 PM
Original message
OT: An invitation some will take her up on
If the most important thing to any of you is choosing someone who did not cast that vote or has said his vote was a mistake, then there are others to choose from,” Mrs. Clinton told an audience in Dover, N.H., in a veiled reference to two rivals for the nomination, Senator Barack Obama of Illinois and former Senator John Edwards of North Carolina.

link


As someone who believes Bush violated the IWR, the sheer arrogance of the above statement is mindboggling.

Why say this in such an in your face way to voters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. It makes no sense to me,
except if the most important issue to her is appearing to be just as tough as the boys.

Bleah. If I want to vote for a woman for president it'll be precisely because she is better than "one of the boys".

I don't see how anyone is excited about her, though after listening to this show last night I can see that some are. To me, she is sort of the worst of all possible democratic worlds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I hate that they are putting it down to her being female
I didn't vote for John Kerry, because he was male. I voted for the ideas and values he had in his head and the compassion that was clearly in his heart. I wouldn't vote for either Clinton at this point.

I am becoming less and less enthused about 2008 and realise more starkly what we lost in 2004. It was as much a fight for the soul of the Democratic party as for the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I was discussing Hillary with members of my family--
Daughter, son-in-law and husband, none of who are paying much attention to politics (I have that cornered for the whole family). Anyway, the view they have of her is that she doesn't mean what she says, and will say anything to get where she wants to be. It doesn't have anything to do with her sex.

Karyn, we may not have voted because he's male, but those pic threads would be a little duller if he weren't. :blush: :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I agree on the picture threads
though as my favorite ones have been the threads of him and Teresa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. For once, I agree with her, though.
Maybe SHE shouldn't have said it - or shouldn't have said it that way - but that's what it really comes down to. It's time to get over it and move on. If someone thinks that one vote is the only one that matters, and they think that their own knowledge of the situation around that vote is so perfect that they won't forgive someone unless s/he grovels at their feet for sufficient time - than the person is a lost cause anyway. Because - as we've seen here at DU - many if not most of those who do this, will not accept the "apology" anyway.

I for one, never had a problem with someone merely voting "yay" on the IWR that came to a vote. My problem is with the people who constructed the form that the vote came in, or were so incompetent as to allow it to happen before the 2002 mid-term elections. (*cough*Edwards*cough*Daschle*...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Daschle's book has a fair amount re the pressure exerted to make IWR vote happen before 2002 midterm
Edited on Tue Feb-20-07 03:46 PM by emulatorloo
My memory has gone to hell so I can't remember the details, and I don't have a copy of it here. but I do remember Daschle writes a long section on the tremendous pressure from Cheney. White House, Rove, Repubs etc to have it done before the midterms, Daschle trying to get it put off. etc.

His book is well worth reading -- Like No Other Time: The 107th Congress and the Two Years That Changed America Forever

I am no Daschle fan, and resisted reading it for a while, but I found it to be a really fascinating book -- it really gives you a real sense of that period -- post 9/11, everyone wanting to stand behind Bush and believing that he would rise to the occasion and do the right thing, and Bush taking advantage of the good will to screw everybody over. Plus the anthrax attack on Daschel's office is pretty interesting to read about. Well worth checking out of the library.

From an amazon user reviews:

But his discussion of the Democratic Party's debate, in the fall of 2002, over going to war in Iraq is priceless. Daschle aptly conveys the slanderous attacks made against the party over Iraq and the Homeland Security bill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Agree about the apology, but her handling of it was inept,
especially when you learn that she's trying to coerce support for her anti-war status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. i agree with her also, but notice she refers to the VOTE specifically
she isn't saying the issue of Iraq is not important but rather than vote.

lets look at the Republican side. you have Chuck Hagel and John McCain who both voted for the IWR. but there is a huge difference between them on what to do in Iraq. and i would rather have Hagel in charge of foreign policy than McCain if it was between them two.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. I just....some days I can barely stand to look at her.
Like another fall of man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC