Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wow. A scathing review of Brokaw's new book, Boom. Omits Kerry & others from Vietnam War history.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 12:22 AM
Original message
Wow. A scathing review of Brokaw's new book, Boom. Omits Kerry & others from Vietnam War history.
Edited on Sat May-24-08 12:23 AM by beachmom
Read the whole thing, but here are the parts relevant to Kerry:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/fred-branfman/on-john-mccain-and-tom-br_b_103193.html

A Review of "Boom!: Voices of the Sixties - Personal Reflections on the 60s and Today", by Tom Brokaw, Random House

(The Author: Fred Branfman exposed the U.S. Secret Air War in Laos while living there from 1967-71, developed solar, educational, and Information Age initiatives for the Governor or California and national policy-makers, and has since 1990 been on a spiritual and psychological journey described at www.trulyalive.org. He can be reached at fredbranfman@aol.com.)



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"I committed the same kinds of atrocities as thousands of others in that I shot in free-fire zones, fired .50-caliber machine bullets, used harass-and-interdiction fire, joined in search-and-destroy missions, and burned villages. All of these acts are contrary to the laws of the Geneva Convention, and all were ordered as written, established policies from the top down, AND THE MEN WHO ORDERED THIS ARE WAR CRIMINALS." (Emphasis added)
n John Kerry, Meet The Press, April 1971

Tom Brokaw's new book bills itself as a "a virtual reunion of a cross section of the Sixties crowd, in an effort to discover what we might learn from each other, forty years later." The next 623 pages primarily consist of interviews with more than 80, mostly successful, veterans of the sixties dealing with the issues of Vietnam, civil rights, women's liberation and electoral politics. Other than Vietnam, his material is relatively unobjectionable, since America has made some progress - though not as much as he suggests - in its domestic arena. The personal stories of women leaders and courageous African-Americans, who rose from the barricades of the civil rights movement to prominence today are particularly inspiring.

One reads the Vietnam war sections of Tom Brokaw's book, a compendium of American conventional wisdom on the Sixties, with a growing sense of amazement, disbelief and, ultimately, profound sadness. For Brokaw has, incredibly, managed to write a lengthy book about the Sixties that barely mentions the central event which produced it.

Is it really possible for America to have killed hundreds of thousands of Indochinese peasants and still, 30 years later, to act as if it never happened?

...

Democratic Party activist and businessman Sam Brown is cited twice in the book, seminal '60s figures like Tom Hayden and Ramparts editor Robert Scheer are ignored. Senator James Webb's portrayal of the war as solely a military battle, and of antiwar protestors as cowardly and unpatriotic, receives 5 or 6 times as much space as anyone else interviewed. The experiences of anti-draft leaders like David Harris, who courageously went to jail out of moral opposition to the war, and people like former volunteer chief Don Luce, who risked his life for years to bring the suffering of the Vietnamese people to public attention, including exposing the Tiger Cages and other torture of tens of thousands of political prisoners, are not included.

Veterans like Bob Kerrey, Colin Powell, Wayne Downing and John McCain, who do not mention U.S. murder of civilians, are interviewed at length. The views of equally well-known veterans who bravely exposed and opposed the murder - like John Kerry, Bobby Muller (whose organization won a Nobel Prize for the landmines treaty) and Ron Kovic (author of Born On The Fourth of July), are written out of Brokaw's history. Pentagon Papers author Les Gelb is interviewed, his co-author Dan Ellsberg - without whom we would never have known of the deceit and crimes the Papers revealed - is not even mentioned. War opponents like George McGovern, Gary Hart and Bill Clinton are only quoted about the war's aftermath - not the crimes that led them to oppose it.

...

Brokaw's refusal to even interview John Kerry about his charge that U.S. leaders were war criminals, the issue that goes to the heart of what triggered the 60s upheavals, is particularly symbolic. If a hero like Kerry had the enormous courage to tell the truth, jeopardizing his political career and potentially angering millions of Americans and fellow vets, why is a Tom Brokaw so afraid today to even raise the issue? Only he can answer that question, but nothing more reveals his book's failure as history or even an honest forum for discussing the real issues of the Sixties.


Now to be fair, we don't know whether Brokaw wanted to interview Kerry but was unable to (maybe he was working on the book in '04 when Kerry was running for president), but I still like the way this writer portrays Kerry. It also is disturbing what he is saying: that we are slowly erasing our own history. Part of me, however, says we are only temporarily forgetting it. This has commonly occurred throughout history -- depending on the mood of the country, certain aspects of historic events are remembered or pushed to the side. So it will be with the anti-war movement in the '60s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. not surprised
i lost any respect for him when he joined in the Dan Rather bashing instead of defending him.

Brokaw was also horrible in the debates he moderated in the 2004 Primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Apparently he picked and chose what he thought was useful history.
The pleasantry's and comments of those he didn't care for he omitted. The book sounds like it should be a long op-ed piece rather than a book on the history of the 60's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Disclaimer: I haven't read "Boom" yet...
...although I plan to. This review makes me want to read it even more, to see how issues of my generation are treated. I would guess...if Brokaw got Viet Nam wrong...there may be other things he should have covered. My guess would be that he wrote a biased account...a Washington, male, non-minority, insider perspective. :)

I do disagree with part of what you wrote here:

"It also is disturbing what he is saying: that we are slowly erasing our own history. Part of me, however, says we are only temporarily forgetting it. This has commonly occurred throughout history -- depending on the mood of the country, certain aspects of historic events are remembered or pushed to the side. So it will be with the anti-war movement in the '60s."


I agree that we might be slowly erasing our own history...and incomplete so-called 'histories' like "Boom" could contribute to that. And I think you are right that it is temporary. But I really can't just brush that aside with the thought that 'that's how history works' and feel comforted that eventually we'll get it right. That 'forgetting' is really dangerous. It's why we ended up in Iraq. It's why some were able to call dissenters unpatriotic, right after 9/11.

We can't afford to forget our history, or be ignorant of it, or let authors like Brokaw get it wrong and not be called to account. Remember, in his Dissent Speech, Senator Kerry talked about VietNam and said "We fought the forgetting." All the mistakes of VietNam had to be brought to light. And sadly, some people still didn't get those lessons in 2001 and beyond.

JK even mentioned one important lesson in his lastest email about Memorial Day...NEVER confuse the war with the warrior:



>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hello XXX,

A thought as we head into what I hope will be a great Memorial Day Weekend for you and your family: put aside the partisan politics, and on this solemn holiday, no matter what we think of this war policy in Iraq, let's keep the men and women who serve our country in our hearts and in our prayers every day.

Hope that since Vietnam we really have learned a lesson of how to separate the war from the warrior.

And when you reflect on the meaning of service and sacrifice and love of country, consider the young veteran who will give our Democratic radio address this weekend -- John Boccieri. John's an Iraq War veteran running for Congress in Ohio, and he summons all our citizens to keep our promise to our veterans. You can listen on the radio this weekend, or go to his site and listen to it now:

http://www.johnforcongress.com

Thank you and have a great holiday weekend,
John Kerry






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh, I should have elaborated more:
In one of my history classes, we looked at an historical event -- the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki -- and how they were interpreted completely differently depending on the era. Just because there was one point (say, in the '50s), where the suffering of the Japanese was brushed aside did not mean that an alternate view of it did not pop up in the late '60s, when people were more suspicious of their government.

We have a lot of data on what went down in Vietnam. And it is possible that this "white wash" going on now is temporary, and the alternative view will come back with a vengeance in 10 or 20 years. The point is WE HAVE THE INFORMATION and the film and everything. It is just not being emphasized right now. Still, John Kerry running for president was a big deal for that history -- I did not know of his role in the war protest (I hadn't even heard of him except for his work on POW/MIA with John McCain), and now after reading several bios on him and viewing "Going UpRiver" I am much more well versed in that era and what the protesters did. That is the upside of him running for president most people don't realize: it gave him a higher profile so that a new generation learned of his heroic activism in the early '70s.

The history is always there if people want to learn it. Tom Brokaw isn't going to change that (and it sounds like he did a good job on other aspects of the 60s).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks, beachmom, for...
...responding. I generally agree with everything you say about how different decades view the historical record differently. I guess I just see Viet Nam and Kerry's role differently (probably because of things in my life during that time).

I don't see what is happening now as a whitewash of Viet Nam history that is temporary. I see it as supression of history that was going on in the 60's and 70's that is still going on today...IMHO it never stopped. I think that alternative view (which I will call 'the truth :7 ) never became mainstream, unfortunately. It's part of the reason I voted for Wesley Clark in the 2004 primary. I was concerned that the rightful dissent in 1971 would be difficult for JK to overcome 30+ years later...because that history has always been distorted by many. It has also been suppressed...so that many young people did not learn the truth about that time.

It's true that the historical record is documented. And some day, history will bear out the truth...I really believe that. The problem is, many young people (in 2004) never gained access to the truth of that record. It was suppressed...and a false caricature drawn. Older Americans who didn't like the truth JK told, were then able to fill that void with their lies (SBVT for example). I DO agree that the 2004 election enlightened many people, particularly young people. When I was volunteering in Nevada in 2004, I drove a lot of them around to do door-to-door canvassing. They were WONDERFUL...so smart and knowledgeable. (Good memories :) ). But I work with other young people , with less access to education, that do not know this history...and they need to.

I guess maybe that's another reason for my opposition to NCLB. It's focus only allows for the teaching of reading and math ...to the exclusion of history and civics. As my high school history teacher always said: "Those who forget history are apt to repeat it." :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. kind of off topic, but did anyone see McCain go after Obama for not serving in the military
he is such an asshole. i hope Kerry goes after Mccain in this area.

especially after the way he sucked up to Bush in 2004 and never came to Kerry's defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's been noted in this forum before, but McCain has ISSUES.
Edited on Sat May-24-08 07:53 PM by BlueIris
And maybe it's wrong of me, but I kinda hope the public is forced to acknowledge that during this race. It's not like I want Obama to have to deal with hurtful criticism, but I want people to see McCain's true face, which isn't pretty (or sane).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yes, it made my blood BOIL. Especially since Obama was too young
for the draft to Vietnam. After that era, people joined the military as a career or to go to college or escape poverty. Are we really going to knock folks after the draft was done away with for not joining the military? If so, then isn't that a knock on, something like 99% of the population?

And the hypocrisy is unbelievable. Where was this defiant McCain in 2004, when Bush specifically joined the TANG to get out of going to Vietnam? Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. When small boys ask why
“when small boys ask why, we will be able to say “Vietnam” and not mean a desert, not a filthy obscene memory but mean instead the place where America finally turned and where soldiers like us helped it in the turning.”

If we don't remember, America will never turn.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=273x82984
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Aren't those beautiful and...
...amazing words? :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC