Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Leopold feeding frenzy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 08:04 AM
Original message
The Leopold feeding frenzy
It's obvious that the sharks are circling in the water for some reason--they've been at it from the moment the story was announced.

Wayyy too convenient.

It would be a great conquest for them to discredit Leopold, Truthout and Will Pitt in one fell swoop. Realize that they have as much to gain by Leopold being wrong as Leopold purportedly has to lose if you buy into their homongous straw man.

Consider the sources--on both sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'll wait a bit before I draw any such conclusions.
The only reason Rove wouldn't be indicted would be if he's cooperating. FIVE(5) sessions before the GJ -- he's been talking about something other than himself.

This waiting stuff is driving some of us nuts, I'll grant that much.:banghead: :yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Quite trying to stir up shit.
Edited on Mon May-15-06 08:17 AM by Harper_is_Bush
In your locked thread from yesterday you made allegations that you never backed up....namely that there were threads that held up NRO or Drudge as "proof" that Leopolds story is false.
You also complained of "multiple" assaults on Leopold/truthout/Will Pitt. Again, NOTHING specific.

Why are you committed to turning DU'ers against each other by claiming things that you cannot give examples of?

You're claiming that there's a conspiracy afoot at DU....some kind of organized attempt to discredit Leopold et al. A serious accusation, and one that you can provide ZERO EXAMPLES OF.

'nuff said.

EDIT: Here's the locked thread I referred to for others to judge:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1189996
see, THAT is how you back something up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. imo, i think he got played like a two-bit fiddle
but the overblown reaction to a SINGLE SOURCE story on a blog is pretty funny i've gotta say. it would be nice scoop, but its not like its the second coming of christ, rove's been under investigation for a long time now, and SOME sort of resolution has been imminent for weeks. sure, it'd be nice to see rove get what he so richly deserves, but whether the news is first heard on radio moscow or cnn or free republic doesn't really make much difference, the point will be that rove is toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. If Rove was not indicted on Friday...
... or close to it, Leopold is going to have a lot of explaining to do. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. Jerry Springer
said validated Rove's indictment on his introduction segment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Oh, Lordy... Springer never checks ANYTHING...
He is the laziest (or has the laziest staff, at least) host in radio. He's always a day late and a dollar short on whatever he reports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. In my opinion
The people who are already attacking the story are setting themselves up also. I was personally happy to read the news here the other night, but I am waiting before I get too excited. It's not that I don't believe it to be true, I just want to be certain. The way it looks now, someone or some people will look silly when it is all said and done and it will be their own fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Has it occurred to you
that Leopold can fail on his own? That he may have made bad choices and it's a HUGE issue so he has a LOT to lose, but is willing to gamble on that?

If he fails it's because he decided to take on this story, very simple.

No amount of carping by anyone can change that.

Remember, Skinner said to try to get along, and that no one is REQUIRED to respect or fall to their knees before any site? Did you see that thread?

I don't think he wants people posting the same arguments over and over to stir things up.. most people seem to be settling down to wait and see what happens, why not just sit back yourself and wait for the proof you want?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. Didn't your thread on this get locked last night?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1189996

And yet you continue on with your cowardly pseudo-accusations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRunner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. Locking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC