Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An Inconvenient Truth- The Ann Coulter Edition

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:22 PM
Original message
An Inconvenient Truth- The Ann Coulter Edition
Edited on Wed Jun-07-06 08:45 PM by journalist3072
During her appearance on the Today show yesterday, Ann Coulter cited certain 9/11 widows (i.e. the "Jersey Girls") as an example of what she calls "the left's doctrine of infallability" (meaning you can't criticize this person because they are a grieving widown or mother).

But in citing this so-called "doctrine of infallability" from the left, Ann Coulter conveniently left out, well, a few inconvenient facts!

She accused the Jersey Girls of "using their political grief to make a political point while preventing anyone from responding."

But not one of the Jersey Girls has tried to prevent Ann Coulter or anyone else from criticizing them.

What's more, in citing the Jersey Girls as an example of "the left's doctrine of infallability," she failed to note that the most vocal of the group, Kristen Breitweiser, is a Republican who voted for George W. Bush in the 2000 election.

When they gathered at the National Press Club in 2004 to explain their endorsement of Sen. Kerry, Mrs. Breitweiser said: "In the three years since 9/11, I could never have imagined I would be here today, disappointed in the person I voted for, for president."

When she was asked if her support of Kerry meant she was no longer a Republican, she said no. She told writer Mary Jacoby (Salon.com) "I'm not a Democrat!" (Gee, that Kristen Breitweiser is one crazy liberal, isn't she Ann?)

Kristen Breitweiser was also asked by Newsweek magazine why she wouldn't be voting again for George W. Bush the second time around:

NEWSWEEK: You supported Bush in 2000. Why are you changing your vote this year?
Kristen Breitweiser: The predominant reason is because I don’t feel President Bush has done everything he could do to make us safer in the three years since 9/11. I’ve personally spent the last three years fighting to try to fix the problems that plague our intelligence apparatus, so we would not be so vulnerable to Al Qaeda the next time around. And during the three years, our largest adversary was the administration. Because of that, I can’t in good conscience vote for President Bush.

Ann Coulter also failed to note that Republicans have used grieving widows and mothers to make their political points.

For example, at the 2004 Republican Convention, they trotted out Deena Burnett, whose husband was killed on Flight 93.

Also, when George Bush went looking for the "anti-Cindy Sheehan" he found it in Tammy Pruett, a mother with four sons serving in Iraq. Pruett spoke out in support of George W. Bush and the war in Iraq by saying "I know that if something happens to one of the boys, they would leave this world doing what they believe, what they think is right for our country. And I guess you couldn't ask for a better way of life than giving it for something that you believe in."

But I don't hear Ann Coulter talking about the right's "doctrine of infallability."

I guess she didn't want a few inconvenient facts getting in the way of her hateful diatribe.

EDITED: To include link to Ann Coulter's interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show yesterday. Go here: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12065856/, and scrolling down to the section "Tuesday's videos."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
This was so good I read it to my husband-great job!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thank you very much! I appreciate that! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Do you all think
that I should send this to Media Matters for America, so they could make note of her leaving out these facts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC