Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HuffPo: Elizabeth Holtzman Calls For bush's Impeachment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:24 AM
Original message
HuffPo: Elizabeth Holtzman Calls For bush's Impeachment
Edited on Wed Sep-27-06 12:25 AM by stopbush
I want to start with a point I made in my new book, The Impeachment of George W. Bush, about why the framers of the Constitution created the impeachment power.

They were afraid that despite the system of checks and balances, a president could subvert the constitution and threaten our democracy.
In other words, the framers anticipated George W. Bush. They knew that sooner or later someone like him--someone who tramples on the rule of law--would appear on the scene. The framers told us what to do about such a president: Impeach him.

Parenthetically, the situation in Afghanistan--where Osama bin Laden actually operated--seems to be deteriorating drastically, a direct consequence of the President's diversion of troops and resources to invade Iraq. President Bush might become the first American president to lose two wars at once.

In addition, yesterday, several high level generals excoriated Secretary Rumsfeld for failing to provide our troops with proper equipment and for invading Iraq without a plan for the occupation. While they are correct, these failings are not Rumsfeld's alone. President Bush is ultimately responsible. As my book details, Bush, the "decider," should have insisted on a serious and thorough plan for the occupation. He didn't. He should also have ensured proper equipment for our troops. He didn't. The consequences for our troops, for Americans, and for Iraqis have been disastrous. Particularly because there was no urgency to the invasion, which had been in planning for more than a year, these failures violate Bush's constitutional duty to "take care" that the laws are faithfully executed.

Every day brings a new justification for impeachment.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-holtzman/a-case-for-impeachment_b_30321.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm patiently waiting....still
but it has to be a wider net.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Impeach Indict Imprison
Nothing less is acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Impeach. Indict. Imprison. Rinse. Repeat.
Until these war criminals are in prison, we're an outlaw nation without honor, undeserving of living in a democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Sometimes I add a 4th I
IMPALE.

But I am opposed to the death penalty as a general rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. (grin) As am I against it.
I think a life sentence of solitary confinement in a padded cell is quite adequate. Add a straitjacket for El Diablo Smirko.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's always good to hear from Elizabeth Holtzman
I admired her courage in bravely standing up to the Nixonites when she was a young congressmember from Brooklyn serving on the Impeachment Committee.

She was the U.S. Senator New York should have had(and would have had, if only Jacob Javits hadn't stayed on as the Liberal Party candidate after losing the 1980 GOP primary, thereby splitting the moderate-to-liberal vote and helping consign the state to eighteen years of Al D'Amato).

I hope the next Democratic president considers her as an Attorney General or Supreme Court nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. He's actually gonna lose THREE wars
Every indication being he's going to be so foolish as to attack Iran.

:nuke: :nuke: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC