Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In memory of Habeas Corpus...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:23 AM
Original message
In memory of Habeas Corpus...
Originally published at:
http://guvwurld.blogspot.com/2006/01/my-speech-to-naacp-today-mlk-day.html

Monday, January 16, 2006
My Speech to the NAACP Today, MLK Day
By Dave Berman

There were probably about 200-300 people at Eureka's Adorni Center today for the NAACP's annual remembrance of Martin Luther King, Jr. I was asked to speak about voting but felt that I didn't know enough about the audience, other speakers, or the event in general to prepare a fully written presentation. I went in with a few notes and improvised something along the following lines...
When the Voting Rights Act was passed in 1965 I was not yet born. I do remember last August when the NAACP put on a big event in Atlanta to commemorate the 40th anniversary of this landmark legislation. I remember Barbara Lee, Cynthia McKinney and John Conyers. They all spoke about stolen elections. The Black Caucus has shown the country's greatest leadership since our constitutional crisis began during the 2000 election.

I remember a year ago last week when the Congresswoman from Ohio, Stephanie Tubbs Jones, along with California's own Barbara Boxer, stood up and made the unprecedented challenge to the 2004 election.

When we hear about the problems with our elections, we learn that 30% of the votes cast around the country in November 2004 were cast on paperless electronic machines. Those votes are unverifiable. They cannot be recounted. No matter what, we can't really know how those votes were truly cast, or what the election's outcome rightfully ought to be.

We hear about private corporations that make these election machines. The machines run on software considered "proprietary," and it is kept secret from the public. Not even our local elections officials know how it works.

Of course we hear a lot about disenfranchisement too. But that's not just for the poor, or African Americans. It isn't even limited to Democratic strongholds. Let me tell you something. Disenfranchisement is universal. And it is guaranteed. If we can't recount the votes, nobody's vote counts and we are all disenfranchised. When we hold elections under these conditions, the Consent of the Governed is not being sought.

Where does this phrase come from, Consent of the Governed? I see a lot of children here today and I know that the Declaration of Independence is still taught in school. Parents, is it enough for your kids to hear the words, or do you think the spirit of Dr. King says they must grasp the meaning too? For some context, the Declaration says:

Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive to these Ends--the self-evident truths that we are created equal with unalienable Rights to Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness--it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such principles and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness

And so we must say, to such unacceptable election conditions: WE DO NOT CONSENT. And to the destruction of the environment: WE DO NOT CONSENT. Can I hear you say it with me now: WE DO NOT CONSENT. Spying on Americans: WE DO NOT CONSENT. War, war, and more war on phony scapegoats: WE DO NOT CONSENT. Peaceful demonstrators labeled as terrorists: WE DO NOT CONSENT. No more innocent until proven guilty: WE DO NOT CONSENT.

How long are we going to continue to allow our citizens to be jailed without charges, detained indefinitely without access to an attorney? We must understand, in the greatest spirit of Dr. King, that non-violent revolution has become necessary, NOW!

I want to invite you all to attend a community forum on Saturday, February 11, starting at 2pm at the Vets Hall. We will be working on what each of us can do, and what we can all do together to take responsibility for turning our words into deeds and truly beginning the peaceful revolution.

Dr. King spoke of Freedom, of being In the Light, and of Every Person Counting. Of this responsibility we each have to the Dream. That Each of us can stand up in a NON-violent way, Oppose the wrongness in our ill society. That only by each of us standing up, being responsible, and demanding that responsibility from our leaders, will we be a Free People. Without a vote, we have no voice, and without a voice, how can we demand this responsibility? Without a voice, we are not a Free People.

WE DO NOT CONSENT.

Thank you.


Special thanks to Ian Blei.

* * *

NOTE: This speech appears in my book We Do Not Consent, a collection of essays from my first blog, GuvWurld, along with a Foreword from Paul Lehto (DUer Land Shark). Download the book as a free .pdf or buy a hard copy for $10.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you, Dave. It reads like affirmation
And so we must say, to such unacceptable election conditions:

WE DO NOT CONSENT.

And to the destruction of the environment:

WE DO NOT CONSENT.

Can I hear you say it with me now:

WE DO NOT CONSENT.

Spying on Americans:

WE DO NOT CONSENT.

War, war, and more war on phony scapegoats:

WE DO NOT CONSENT.

Peaceful demonstrators labeled as terrorists:

WE DO NOT CONSENT.

No more innocent until proven guilty:

WE DO NOT CONSENT.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks Wilms.
This was the first time I ever did call and response during a public speaking gig. It was well received. One of the people I met that day was Nathan Smith, VP of the local NAACP chapter. He has since stood several times with the Voter Confidence Committee as we work for fair elections in Humboldt County. It truly was an honor to speak to that group and then to build such a strong connection with one of its leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
resist_vote on paper Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Good Post! Time to go demo?
Like your brothers in Manchester did:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jk1T08VgwsE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
resist_vote on paper Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Useful? How to hack a diebold voting mashine...
I don't know if it works, but at least its funny - or not really...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marty-kaplan/how-to-hack-a-diebold-vot_b_26301.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Great Speech!
I hope you got a good response from the crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks KT2000
I do quite a bit of public speaking and this talk stands out as one of the most memorable and impactful. Here is the text of prepared remarks I made at a press conference on June 6 when the Voter Confidence Committee rejected the results of the CA Primary Election and challenged the media not to report as fact what can't be proven (unverifiable election results). This one was a lot of fun too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thanks for passing that on
I now have to check to see if my county is using the Diebold optical scanners since our entire county went to absentee ballots this year.
I will also be checking your blog.
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Check this for killer talking points
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bring me the Body...
Edited on Mon Oct-02-06 02:45 AM by autorank
I thought they were asking for Jesse the Body Ventura...

:scarcasm:

Look, it took 4000 years of recorded history to get habeas corpus but we had it for a little over 800 years. Since were regressing or de-evolving, it makes sense to dump it. What's the big deal. Stop your whining. All you are doing is upsetting our "maximum leader."


True story: I was returning to the DC area from the "We Count" Conference in Cleveland. An Ohio State Police officer pulled me over for speeding. He came up the the car, was very pleasant, and as he wrote my ticket, we chatted. I said, "Did you hear that they suspended habeas corpus." He said, "I didn't get that memo." I explained the new law briefly. He said, "Is it for terrorism?" and I said "Yes it is but they get to decide what "terrorism" is and then deny you the write to a lawyer and torture you to boot." He said, "Well Mr. Collins, will you please sign this. It's just a fine. We won't be torturing you today." It was actually very clever, a sort of Noel Coward dialogue on the highway. But I could see that he was a bit upset by this, not my comments, the notion that they had gone so far.

This law will be seen for what it is...a weak attempt to shield the president and cogress with the full knowledge that they're trashing the Constitution as they do it. But you know what, I think that they like doing this sort of thing. They're the type of people, who leave a mess just to make a point...some mess,some point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. A fine!
After all you've done for us with election fraud issues. That officer could have given you a warning, not a ticket. That's torture of the wallet.

After the mess this administration has left us, they should be tortured under the same laws they just passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Well, I am guilty;)
But I did deserve a break. I was tired and I'd worked hard ... how would he know?

He did delier a great line, worth the ticket: "t's just a fine. We won't be torturing you today."

Really clever and not a bit of malice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Never admit anything.
Haven't you learned anything these last six years?

Repeat after me:

It wasn't me.

I don't recall.

Car? What's a car?

Nobody could have imagined that I was even there.

I did not have sexual relations with that conspiracy theory.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. This was a special circumstance...
...I knew the guy was a card so I wanted to set up the good lines. Actually, I opened things up when he asked confirmatory questions about by VA license. "What color are your eyes?" "Bloodshot" The guy cracked up. Then I seized the opportunity and laid on the political advocacy. This is the first and last time I'll ever admit guilt in a traffic encounter (because I'm always innocent;) ...but this was a special op; had to get the word out about the torture bill. He'll go read about it, realize it's nothing but trouble for the cops (since it activates the extremes who will assume they'll get tortured for a ticket), and we've got another vote. In general, you're absolutely right. You can even carry it over to other areas by adopting baseball great Albert Bell's statement after being very rude to a young fan. "Would you like to apologize to that little fan not." Bell: "I apologize for nothing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. This may sound...
really pessimistic, Keep a copy of the constitution. Put it away somewhere safe, for the future.

I am over 50, and I feel if they steal this one...a copy of the constitution will come in very useful in the future. It can still live on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think I prefer the Declaration of Independence
I've been thinking a lot lately about the contrast between the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. Above all other reasons, I'm partial to the Declaration because its words are a re-set button for the Constitution when the government becomes destructive. The Declaration came first, then the Constitution. The Declaration is the precedent. The Declaration tells us to expect future revolutions and it outlines the conditions under which they should occur. Peaceful revolution is necessary, NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
12. Kick (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
13. Kick (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. Kick (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. Here ya go:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. That is stellar, Swamp Rat.
Thanks for posting that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. Powerful. Dead on. I DO NOT CONSENT!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
22. This is habeas corpus:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC