Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Misled" is an awfully kind word for what bush has done.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 03:33 AM
Original message
"Misled" is an awfully kind word for what bush has done.
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/457557p-385014c.html

White House counselor Dan Bartlett hit the Sunday talk-show circuit to challenge the key contention in Bob Woodward's bombshell new book, "State of Denial," that President Bush and his advisers have been misleading the country about Iraq.

"The evidence in the book ... contradicts his very thesis of denial," Bartlett said on CNN's "Late Edition."

"Throughout this book, throughout many of the President's public speeches, he's been very blunt with the American people about the difficulty of this war," Bartlett said.

In the book, Woodward writes that: The administration got bleak reports about worsening violence in Iraq but gave the public a rosy picture; that Secretary of State Rice blew off requests to kill Osama Bin Laden before 9/11 when she was national security adviser, and that even though Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld bungled the war, he survived internal White House calls for his head.

-----------------

So, bush was "misleading" us all about the war, that's too kind of a word for what he's done. When a leader misleads, he is a shitty leader or no leader at all, especially if he misled us into a war.

Lied is a more descriptive and less rosy word, and lying about war is much more than merely misleading.

You weren't lied to America, you were merely misled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. misled for lies & mistakes for crimes
seeing either of the words "misled" or "mistakes" in conjunction with someone mentioning Iraq causes me to snarl. Just a pack of liars lying about the lies.

Crimes were (are) committed in Iraq. Lets call them what they are...
Lies were (are) told about Iraq. Lets call them what they are...

Anything less is legitimizing the lies and protecting the liars and the criminals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. the word does not soften the suffering
of all those thousands of people and our twenty thousands crippled soldiers and the twenty seven hundred dead ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Calling it what it really is wouldn't do that either - but-
Edited on Mon Oct-02-06 04:05 AM by Solly Mack
but at least calling it what it really is would be honest...and would help in going after those criminally responsible

and the people already dead and those that will die from the lies deserve that much...at the very least
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Let's face it . . .

HE LIED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. Everything but liar
Misled, misinformed, misspoke, misunderestimated, "state of denial", incorrect, bad intelligence, in error... The list is limitless. But no "liar".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. If he'd just said "There are WMD in Iraq"
then it could, at a very generous interpretation, have been taken to be an honest mistake.

What he actually said, "I have proof that there are WMD in Iraq, which I'm not going to show you" *must* have been a conscious and deliberate lie.

So must "we have not yet committed ourselves to going to war".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. tony snow: its an outrage to even suggest that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC