Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How dare they bring up Clinton after it was about Lying not sex

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:52 AM
Original message
How dare they bring up Clinton after it was about Lying not sex
Remember how they brayed and brayed about it is about LIES and had absolutely nothing to do with SEX. Now they are out in droves saying it is comparable to Clinton. How dare they....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. You act surprised.
These people absolutely refuse to take responsibility for ANYTHING!!
Everything is, and always will be, Clinton's fault.
Don't forget -- they are the "party of morals".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent point, Bandit!
They all said it was not about "sex"...but now they say it's about sex??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. Comparisons to Clinton should be ignored.
We need to use the Foley mess as a symptom of the Republican Party as a whole - a party of unchecked power that believes they are above the law and commit acts of immoral, unethical and criminal behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. After 2008, Bush's fault, GOP fault, up or down vote, using it for
political gain, etc....ALL those should become our mantra for awhile.

Call me feeling entitled today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. Republicans aren't as bothered by hypocrisy as normal people are.
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. Even if it was about sex with Clinton, Monica was an adult!
BIG, BIG difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yep, she was no innocent 13 year old girl he was trying to seduce n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Bragged she was going to DC to get her "presidential kneepads"
Clinton was a fool to get involved with her, but this was a deceitful, VERY sexually active young woman who set her sights on him long before she went to Washington, and well before she had even met him.

www.nndb.com/people/588/000025513

Monica Lewinsky had a long-running affair (5 years) with a married man -- her high school drama teacher. It began just after Lewinsky's graduation in 1991, and ended in 1997, when his wife found out. During that time Lewinsky often babysat for their children.

In June 1995, when Lewinsky landed her internship in White House Chief of Staff Leon Panetta's office, she reportedly told friends, "I'm going to the White House to get my presidential kneepads."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC