Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New spin on Foley from Freeperville:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:16 PM
Original message
New spin on Foley from Freeperville:
Edited on Mon Oct-02-06 02:23 PM by leftyladyfrommo
This was just all a Democratic plot to make the Republicans look bad right before the elections.

The story must have been broken by a Democrat - given to ABC News.

Story was probably held for who knows how long until right now - so we could do the most damage.

Actually - what they are describing sounds more like something they would do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Umm, It is Clinton's fault.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. They have been trying that angle all day
Trying to bring Clinton and Democrats into the same sentence every time they make some weak attempt to downplay the seriousness of this matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. The Clenis
Edited on Mon Oct-02-06 02:26 PM by hfojvt
He set a bad example and impressionable young Mark Foley just got lured into a life of depravity, aided by the porn which the ACLU has been defending for years.

This is exactly what happens when you take prayer out of the schools, and spanking too :spank:

Uh oh. Is Rush reading DU? :scared:

Or just writing on it? :hide: O8) (edit, I had to look that up. Apparently it is O not 0 :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. that George Soros is a tricky one
:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. the victims were Republicans
Republicans have Republican pages, Dems have Dem pages...

How do those mrons spin that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. It's like Foley KNEW that party loyalty would keep the
victims and families from going to the proper authorities.

Like any good child molester, he chose his victims carefully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Still no outrage over Foley's actions - only that they were made public
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well yeah the story was held... by House Republicans for @ least a year...
...and perhaps as much as the past 5 years! Bloody hell. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. The bumbling racists and perverts and criminals of the grand old party
do not need any help from the loyal opposition to "look bad" right before the elections.

Can we surmise that regardless of the bad news and perversion involved that free republic members would still vote for foley if he were still a candidate? No doubt, he reflects their "values."

The only member of the Page committee that didn't know about foley's follys was the only democrat on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Fuck Freepers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. No thanks - but they are too much fun to ignore. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. Way to take responsibility!
Geez, the Freepers are pathetic.

They'll nail Clinton to the wall. They'll lambaste welfare moms for failing to
be responsible. They'll tout "individual accountability" when it comes to poor
people who just need to work harder.

However, when it comes to pedophile Congressmen in their own party--they blame
the Dems.

What a bunch of intellectually stunted clowns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. And they're saying the e-mails are altered
http://passionateamerica.blogspot.com/2006/10/foleygate-mark-foley-emails-altered.html

Foleygate : Mark Foley emails altered


***Updates at the bottom***

Who altered the Mark Foley emails?

The Congressman Mark Foley child sex scandal keeps getting stranger by the minute. I am starting to think it should be called Foleygate. Someone has altered the emails that Mark Foley is accused of sending to a congressional page. Look for yourself:


This is a picture of the email that was originally posted at Stop Sex Predators.

(I have marked the differences with red arrows. Click to enlarge)

Foleygate email

And here is a screen capture of the email from a pdf file from Citizens For Ethics website.

(I have marked the differences with red arrows. Click to enlarge)

Foleygate email

One of the emails could be an original but one set of the emails has been retyped to look very close to the other email. They are not complete matches. You can make a side by side comparison of all of the emails and they all have errors like this.

Update: Great minds think alike, justbarkingmad.com has come to the same conclusion.

Update #2: Flopping Aces has come to a similar conclusion and 186k Per Second.

Update #3: Welcome Hot Air readers. I have contacted Allah about some more information that I have that I think needs to be released. Check this post for a hint of what I have and believe needs to be released.

Update #4: Welcome lgf readers. I can't believe I even have to say this, but it seems some people (Liberals) are suggesting that I am trying to defend Foley. That is ridiculous. I am just pointing out that there are some serious questions that need to be answered about this story.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. oh right, now they're going to try the old "IBM selectric" trick that
worked so well on Dan Rather. Look at the poor pathetic *bots trying to spin gold out of S**T!
freekin dumb@$$es.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. i'm sure little green shitballs is working this angle hard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. the appropriate response to #4 is....
Let's have a full-scale investigation, turn over every rock, verify the authenticity, and get to the truth.

They don't want an investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. .
Hm I checked it out. First, besides the emails, there are still the IMs that are until now more explicit and that basically say the same (wished to meed the kids).
From the pictures it also seems as if the adresses were different. There is way more blacked out in one of the emails. Maybe he just wrote the same shit to different kids.
It is also strange that one email seems to be the corrected version. So whatever, the content is the same and they are still protecting this freak.


Meanwhile...
Update #5: Looks like the scum at Democratic Underground have found me. Get ready for left wing insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I'm guessing the e-mails were forwarded
and that is why the formatting is different. Do we know the source of the e-mails yet, other than a blog site, which was then reported by ABC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. Ha! There are barely any prominent Democrats out there
with functioning spines, much less the chops to pull off something like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. I actually heard it compaired ot the Monica Lewinsky scandal on Fox
today. I was waiting for a meeting and the news on there was reporting it. They were saying how it is a sex scnadal like with Clinton and it will have staying power. In my head, I was thinking how is a consenual affair between 2 adults anything like a perverted pedophile preying on teenagers?
I suppose it should have staying power....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. They make it sound like a republcon plot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC