Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Identity of one of Mark Foley IM buddy found

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
commissure Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:12 PM
Original message
Identity of one of Mark Foley IM buddy found
I hate to link to this crap but I think we should just be informed. Someone at the Passionate America web page plus Ms. Underestimated found out the identity of one of the kids Foley was IMing through a slip up at ABC News. I think Drudge has already linked to it and is now claiming that the kid was 18 at the time. I can't believe they went and dug up the kids name.

http://passionateamerica.blogspot.com/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks but dupe from yesterday even.
It is appalling and hope that blogger gets in legal trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Um, how is that possible that he'd get in trouble?
This is, sadly, very much the kind of speech that the 1st Amendment protects. The Founders tilted towards more disclosure, not less, even if it'd be messy. Because life's messy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. releasing information about a victim of a crime, esp if minor
ongoing investigation and all (been waiting to use that phrase)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. What investigation.
And gag orders need to come from judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I do not think it is legal to release names of minors in possible crime
cases. Will be announcing an investigation by "Louie Freeh - former head of FBI, a confirmed nut case and a member of Opus Dei" is the rumor. There is an investigation into what is going on, what has gone on. And it think it is illegal to release names, esp if under 18. May be wrong, but I think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. You're serious? In a possible crime where no gag order exists?
Guess you learn something new everyday...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. minor. What about releasing names of minors who were raped?
I know, this young person, IF a minor, was sexually seduced, which is a crime that is a bit different, but still, I thought it was illegal. I've been wrong before, but thought it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. quick google search got me this.
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 01:05 PM by uppityperson
NH says this, not sure federal or otherwise (NH was first to come up, think WA where I live has similar). Looks like applies to media, not sure if bloggers apply.
http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:BPUl0y5SLmkJ:dept.fvtc.edu/ojjdp/nh.pdf+release+name+of+minor+crime&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=2&client=firefox-a
169-B:37. Publication of Delinquency Restricted
I. It shall be unlawful for any newspaper to publish, or any radio or television station to
broadcast or make public the name or address or any other particular information serving to
identify any juvenile arrested, without the express permission of the court; and it shall be
unlawful for any newspaper to publish, or any radio or television station to make public, any of
the proceedings of any juvenile court. Nothing in this section or RSA 169-B:35 and RSA 169-
B:36 shall be construed to prevent publication without using the name of the delinquent of
information which shall be furnished by the court about the disposition of a case when the
delinquent act would constitute a felony if it were the act of an adult.


Confidentiality is the term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Since when was the page arrested or tried in juvenile court!?
Think back to the abortion doctor list case where people on the list were being killed. This blogger won't get nailed. No way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. the page is the victim. Page was VICTIM, possibly a MINOR
victim confidentiality, especially if a minor. I agree the blogger probably won't get nailed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. The law cited above, as I expected, protects the names of juvenile perps
Nothing there about victims. The two matters ought not be confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. you are right about that law. I'm not a lawyer, still think don't release
names of victims. Especially juvenile ones. Now, off to listen to cspan while getting ready for work and try to lock this thread due to OP. Maybe catch you later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Yeah, we'll see what the hell happens...
But making illegal the release of the names of victims on a blanket basis is something that they do in the United Kingdom, not the United States, as a result of a little thing they call the American Revolution, a piece of paper called the Bill of Rights, etc etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. not releasing names of juvenile victims IS typical
no need to quote Bill of Rights, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. It's typical, but it's also voluntary.
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 01:31 PM by Kagemusha
Those who wish to behave like scum are able to behave like scum unless very specifically prohibited. See: Phelps, Fred

Just saying. Not saying it's a good thing in this case. And the blogger did behave like the worst scum. But the minute someone goes after him for it, it'll be 'Look! More government persecution of journalists!'

So I thought I'd say how that just isn't gonna happen now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. .
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 01:12 PM by Hav
Sadly, I must say that you are most likely right. I can't imagine the blogger getting busted for anything at all. Even another newspaper named the page who is working for a campaign now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. "What investigation." ?????WTF?????
Lol, what rock did YOU just crawl out from under?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. My rock says the FBI didn't investigate for 2 months.
My rock says Hastert didn't investigate (for real) for somewhere between 1 and 10 years.

My rock wonders if an investigation actually started yet. Talk of an investigation starting doesn't mean one was started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. so you don't think they are investigating to see if there was crime?
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 01:13 PM by uppityperson
seriously? Even though the FBI is involved, they are not investigating? OK. whatever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I think the FBI is doing preliminary investigations but...
Did you see that CREW says the FBI has been blatantly lying to the media and blaming CREW for handing over redacted information and refusing to cooperate with subsequent FBI inquiries, and that's why the FBI didn't investigate, saying it didn't think anything in the IM's amounted to criminal activity?

That is not a full investigation. That's a half-assed preliminary investigation two months after the fact accompanied by lies to the press to cover their butts. This is not some sweet innocent thing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Investigation is a joke, I agree.
what will happen? Don't know but lies and coverups abound.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pathetic invasion of privacy by the brownshirts.
Mr. "Passionate America" surely thinks he has completely exonerated his dear political party from the coverup of Foley's predatory behavior.

I'm sure it pained you greatly to have to link to it. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
achtung_circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rawstory (via JG) says otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. foley story - the gift that just keeps giving...


thanks for posting that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. He's been identified and has hired an attorney
AND I'M NOT GOING TO POST ANY LINK THAT IDENTIFIES THE EX-PAGE AS JUST BECAUSE IT'S NOW IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN DOESN'T MAKE IT ETHICAL FOR US TO FURTHER SPREAD IT AROUND!

Unfortunately, an Oklahoma newspaper printed a story about this ex-page hiring an attorney (the ex-page is an Oklahoman) but I'm not going to supply the link to that newspaper's site because they also used the victim's full name (they also identified him as a "victim" as if he isn't). If it pains you to not have a link, tough... I'm not going to spread his name around any more than it already has been...

The attorney's name is Stephen Jones, and "Jones" refers to him...

<snip>

But Jones said, "It is my understanding there is both a Justice Department interest in this matter and also the House of Representatives Ethics Committee is interested.

"My feeling is that the House will move forward with its investigation. Since Mr. Foley is no longer a member of the House, I don't know whether the (House) Ethics committee will ultimately end up looking at this, or whether the committee in charge of the program will do so."

...

And I can see why he hired the guy...

http://www.stephenjoneslaw.com/
Stephen Jones and his team of litigators, experts and support staff will take on anybody.

They have no fear. As managing partner of the law firm of Jones, Otjen, Davis Mr. Jones focuses on complex matters involving Income Tax Fraud Defense, National Security Law, and White-Collar Crime Charges including RICO, stock fraud, mail fraud, money laundering, wiretapping and conspiracy.

He also works extensively with clients who are facing government bias or discrimination.

...

The ex-page is apparently going to appear before either the Ethics committee or the committee in charge of the program as a witness, and he'd be a fool to not be represented by experienced counsel for that. I sure as hell wouldn't without a good attorney, and it looks like the attorney hired is a good choice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
36. I believe Jones was Tim McVeigh's attorney.
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 01:32 PM by karlrschneider
...
edit: Just confirmed this, same guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
achtung_circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. From Wild Bill's comments, courtesy the General



http://www.haloscan.com/comments/passionateamerica2/115996317940733096/?a=50201#48824

Wow, Wild Bill. What a man! "Outing" a target of Mark Foley's predation. There's a special place in hell for you -- and i know i am not the only Republican who feels this way.

It doesn't matter how many times you assert that Mark Foley is a scumbag; you are in his league when it comes to scumbaggery. To you, it's all about the hard-right retaining power over the Republican Party.

It's time for a purge -- of predators like Foley and their sycophantic revenge-monkeys like you.

And believe me: if this kid gets so much as one harassing e-mail or threatening phone call, you'd best get a lawyer. And not a litigator -- I'm talking criminal defense, you idiot.
Grover Norforms | 10.04.06 - 11:52 am | #


BTW, we share your pain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. scary
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 12:38 PM by Hav
Great - now this kid will GET what's coming to him - now they can hunt him down and make him PAY
Carrion | 10.04.06 - 11:35 am | #
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. waiting for the lock
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. if you "Hate to link this crap" them why do so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. .
Lol he got pretty defensive when the identity of his son got probably revealed. Not so tough anymore.

It doesn't matter whether the page isn't a minor anymore. He was the victim and deserves some privacy so that it won't haunt him the rest of his live or so that he doesn't get harassed by some freeps. But that is what this hack might have intended.
He also might only want to get hits for his load of ads so we should refrain from linking to his page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. I went back and read your 13 posts....something ain't right.
just sayin....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. mmmmmmmmhuh.
the whiff of insincerity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Probably looking for more fame
Mods should at least remove every link to this site like they do with certain other sites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
41. i couldn't even find his/her posts...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. Nice of you to add insult to injury. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Yes, and the link to the site should be deleted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
23. THEN DON'T!
Yeah, like it really pained you to spread this kid's name around some more for absolutely no purpose whatsoever.

Sick.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. tombstone 10, 9, 8, ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Can't happen soon enough!
I hope everyone alerted. This is just disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
35. Mods - lock this shit now. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC