Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dsgusted at Tweety & Scarborough's glib attitude during/after Hastert

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
zonkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 02:03 PM
Original message
Dsgusted at Tweety & Scarborough's glib attitude during/after Hastert
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 02:06 PM by zonkers
conference. They, Hastert, Republicans, the ethics committee sure seem like a BS stall tactic until after election. What utter whores. (on edit) And how many times does Tweety have to say the word HARDBALL? I think hardballs is what started this scandal to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. yep.
After all, that is all this country is about anymore. Winning the next election.
Not freedom or honesty or integrity or ethics.
Just winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zonkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. This thing is being spun the wrong way r ight before our eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Anymore?
No offense, but when was this golden age of honest politics that you lament?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrat 4 Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Tweety has seen the overnight ratings on his show. He is trying to
plug his show with free advertisements as much as he can, every chance he can. He is getting his feathery little ass kicked by Keith every dang night and he is very unhappy. Boo fricking hoo. He has to be fuming because I'm sure he thinks he has more "street creds" to have a political show while Olbermann is "just" a sportscaster.

Memo to Tweets - Honesty is the first criteria for a journalist. Any journalist. You sold your honesty at a fire sale many years ago. You aren't fit to do voice overs for a local access channel in Bumfuck, Egypt compared to Keith Olberman and Countdown. Give it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I'm sure Tweety is jealous of Keith, but they are on at diff. times.
I watchThe Sit Room till 6PM, then Dobbs, then switch to Tweety, then Keith. Tweety's opponent in the same slot is the 3rd Hr of The Sit Room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. You can't get MORE cynical than Tweety...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. They only care about the horserace
It's all inside baseball to them.

Of course, up here on my high horse, I can admit there's a certani amount of cynicism about this issue around here too.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ethics Committee? In Congress? Surely you jest!
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 02:07 PM by TornadoTN
It seems like a stall tactic to me. I'm sure the final report will have the G.O.P. coming out smelling like flowers in a spring rain.

Dead interns didn't stop Joe, so he should know about how powerless that committee is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Don't be too sure. Stephanie Tubb Jones
is on that committee. She sees through the b.s. and I'm sure is not going to allow for any GOP attempts to whitewash it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Let's hope
You can be rest assured that the G.O.P. will strong arm this committee, just like every other one on the Hill. I just hope all of the Democrats stick together and really speak forcefully on this matter to keep it in the forefront.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. "It will take MONTHS to investigate"
Oh, I'm sure it will. Hell, while we're at it, it could take YEARS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. "no comment' Time (ongoing investigation)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. When Buchanan is one of the "pundits", the deck is stacked
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 02:36 PM by Rose Siding
Chris hawked today's upcoming show with this note about the guest, Steney Hoyer: "We'll see what the Dems are saying because so far they aren't saying MUCH!"

Riiiiight. I e-mailed:

Chris, After Rep Hastert's press conf today, during your chat with the very conservative Pat Buchanan, you hawked today's upcoming show with this note about the guest, Steney Hoyer: "We'll see what the Dems are saying because so far they aren't saying much"

Do you really believe that? Here are just the last few remarks from Democrats that I've come across this morning.

The Hill reports:

From Pelosi (not her only statement -she has made several- but it goes to the heart of the matter):

“Republicans just don’t get it; every mother in America is asking how Republican’s could choose partisan politics over protecting kids, and the Republicans are asking who could have blown their cover-up,” said Pelosi spokeswoman Jennifer Crider. “If we had seen Mark Foley’s horrific e-mails or instant messages, we would have immediately acted to protect these kids.”

And here's an impressive collection of excerpts from remarks by Democrats that you haven't seen yet:

Darcy Burner has a very effective response. She wrote a letter to her Congressman, who also is, of course, her opponent. Excerpts:
I write to you today as a constituent and mother. . . . The disgraceful acts committed by former Congressman Mark Foley are a black mark on the halls of the people's House. The inaction of the House leadership in addressing the issue only makes it worse. . . . I ask you to join me in calling for the resignation of Speaker Dennis Hastert.

Red State Rebel diaried the statement of Idaho's Larry Grant last night. Grant did a fantastic job of tying the scandal to the issues he's focused on in the campaign, arguing that it "cements the need for change":
We need more accountability in our government. We have started a war without having a plan to end it, sent troops into battle without adequate armor, relied on inadequate and questionable intelligence, suffered the highest gas prices in history, and turned FEMA into one of the most inept government agencies of all time. And Congress does nothing.

It is definitely time for change.


Paul Hodes gives a straight-up, strong statement of what's wrong with the Rubber Stamp Republican Congress his opponent represents:
"Whether it's knowledge of intolerable conduct within the House or warnings about the war in Iraq, this Congress just doesn't want to face reality, much less hold anyone accountable. They'll say and do anything to hold onto power," said Paul Hodes, a Democrat challenging GOP Rep. Charlie Bass in New Hampshire.

Eric Massa hones right in on the cover-up:
"It's one thing for Randy Kuhl to keep mum as the Congressional leadership shortchanges veterans with unfair cuts," declared Massa. "It's a whole different matter to remain silent in matters of child safety. The record is clear: the House Republican leadership knew there was a snake in the nursery and they did worse than nothing, they left a man in office who stands accused of improper sexual advances to a male teenage page."

Patrick Murphy focuses on the culpability of the House leadership, and makes a strong demand for Hastert's resignation:
" not just resign his leadership post . . . he should resign as a U.S. Congressman . . . Based on the fact that he knew, among his ranks in the U.S. Congress, there was a sexual predator. I'm a former prosecutor; I prosecuted a sexual predator, a Lt. Commander in the Navy. The fact is this: a Member of the United States Congress. He's supposed to keep our families safe."

Joe Sestak also puts responsibility directly on House leadership and the larger issues the scandal has exposed:
By failing to take swift action against Foley, the former co-chair of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children, the Republican leadership and this `Less Than Do Nothing Congress' have sent Americans a message that they are more interested in keeping power than protecting our children. . . . This `Do Nothing Congress' is not only incompetent but it's also missing a moral compass. On November 7th, voters will elect Joe Sestak, because he has a vision to change the way Washington does business."

Linda Stender puts her opponent on the spot:
"Having the perspective of a mother, I am disappointed that the GOP leadership did not take action to protect vulnerable children from a sexual predator. It's time for some accountability and for some common sense change in Washington. Speaker Hastert has lost the moral authority to properly run the business of the people and should resign, and I would urge Congressman Ferguson to join this call. Outrage is not enough: It's time for action and a change."

Asked for his response to the fact that neither Dick Cheney nor Barbara Cubin talked about those good old family values at a Wyoming fundraiser Gary Trauner summed it up perfectly:
"It's tough to talk about traditional values when the leadership of the party covered up a predator for political purposes," he said.

The original sources for these are found on this web page:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/10/4/22404/7857

Now that you see that Democrats have been saying plenty, I hope you'll report about that on your show.

Thanks,
yada yada
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC