Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The misbehavior with pages was going on during Clinton's impeachment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 07:35 PM
Original message
The misbehavior with pages was going on during Clinton's impeachment
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 07:36 PM by undeterred
and how many people knew about it but said nothing? Randi says the Page classes going back as far as 1995 reported problems with Foley but it fell on the deaf ears of a Republican majority.

They went after Clinton with such self-righteous moral outrage - though his behavior was not illegal and harmed no one.

But they left teenagers to fend for themselves against the abuse of a Congressman's power over them. What a bunch of arrogant, morally bankrupt hypocrites. I cannot fathom how anyone can vote for a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. They probably delivered copies of the bill of impeachment to the members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Typical Republican BS- Man on Boy= "Family values"- "Clenis"=Anti-Christ
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocknrule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Correction: Man on boy = family values, man on man = Antichrist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, surprising, considering they throw soldiers into the
line of fire like charcoals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. I might well get flamed for this one, but - WHERE were the dems then
on this issue?

Shit, they could have been all over it, investigating it or at least shouting it every time they got the chance to.

Both parties seem to have let us down. Again.

Why didn't pages approach dems as they knew they would (I hope) jump on it. What about clinton's fbi, etc and so on?

My faith in the whole of government slips each year. Not surprising anymore really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. they were left out, the one democrat on the Page board was excluded and
not even told about the first meeting on foley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. here ya go...
Dems didn't know. Repukes would have guarded this secret with their very lives from the Dems... the results of what is happening now is what they always feared. Remember, they were solely focused on finding something - ANYTHING - legitimate to bring down Clinton (which is why Clinton was stupid beyond belief to be diddling Monica... he knew they were after his hide). If it was first known by anyone while they were on the Clenis story (their shining moment that they'll never let anyone forget), they HAD to keep a very tight lid on it... what's the ONE thing that would have gotten Clinton off the hook completely AND focused on the Repukes? Obviously, a Repuke scandal infinitely worse than the shabby one they were busy harping on. After the impeachment was said and done what were they going to do? Still have to keep a lid on it, or the gains they made with the Clinton impeachment would have gone flying out the window, AND they would have been at a high risk for being found out they covered it up during the Clinton impeachment for politically purposes while leaving the pervert free to continue stalking pages... eeeeee gad! Infinitely worse... suicide actually. They could NEVER let a Dem find out about it... NEVER, EVER.

The more years go by, the more their dingle-dangles are caught in the wringer. All they can do is try to contain it. Warn the Repuke pages. Give Foley a talking to. But Foley KNOWS they have to protect him, and it only makes him gleefully bolder. His behavior was RAMPANT. Often this is how predators finally do get caught... they get so bold they think nothing can stop them. Like all perverts, he thinks he's got the kids terrified into keeping the secret. It's just as much of a dirty little secret as incest is... even the people that find it horrible and disgusting are trapped into keeping the secret because of the scandal. And just like most perverts, deep down inside they know what they're doing is reprehensible, so they delude themselves into believing that their victims actually want it to stave off guilt.

The pages didn't come forward and tell anyone for reasons that really should be obvious... the same reason MOST sexually abused woman and children don't. Fear, shame, scandal, loss of their entire career that had barely begun, self-denial... all those things. How could they prove it? Would they even be believed? Foley was a CONGRESSMAN for God's sake! Most sexually harassed victims who are preyed on by their teeny little middle management bosses in their teeny little back of beyond offices don't even feel they can tell anyone, and this was a U.S. CONGRESSMAN! They're trapped. Remember, it had only been very recently that with the Clarence Thomas hearings that anyone even NOTICED sexual harassment... and look how that worked out for him!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. REMEMBER -- Newt was having sex with intern while attacking Clinton
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 08:07 PM by bobbieinok
M$M knew this but 'kindly' protected public from this knowledge.

I remember how furious I was when I heard a 'news' person say in answer to a question about this 'why everyone in DC knew this.' I screamed 'the PUBLIC didn't know!!!!!!'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. They should import pages from poor countries
that the symbols of congress, spreading the splooge,
unleaded the loss of face, in the narrowing gap,
between how it digress, oppress a billion huge,
as the republican cat jumps in and out the cat flap.

Bent over poor people take it just hard, fucked for life,
in American prisons, taken over by the horror of this
threatening, conformist, judgemental, society.. rife
on the white man's rod, limply with nuclear hubris.

Ending, funnily in the demise of everything
everyone cared about, left without a television
remote, or the need to switch a thing,
time and the earth, mother of all vision.

Limited, left of center, not enough conformed,
bookish, burned, in every pyre unmourned.

in every deathbed unmoving,
nighmarish leaddite,
a gun in every hand,
behind every page,
waylaid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. The Republicans have just sewn-up the pedophile vote.
The rest? I'm with you, how can anyone else vote for them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC