Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT: A Standoff Over Plan for 'Die Hard' Filming

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 11:35 PM
Original message
LAT: A Standoff Over Plan for 'Die Hard' Filming
A Standoff Over Plan for 'Die Hard' Filming

A request to close the 105 Freeway and Imperial Highway near LAX is opposed by airlines.
By Jennifer Oldham
Times Staff Writer

October 5, 2006

In a disagreement between two of the region's largest economic engines — aviation and entertainment — airlines at Los Angeles International Airport are protesting a request by 20th Century Fox to close portions of the 105 Freeway and Imperial Highway this fall to film scenes for the latest Bruce Willis action flick, "Live Free or Die Hard."

The dispute surfaced in an Oct. 2 letter to Film L.A., the organization contracted by the city and county of Los Angeles to issue permits to studios. Airport officials said closing two roads that provide access to LAX would cause traffic backups that could inconvenience passengers, delay deliveries to cargo carriers and hamper construction on the southernmost runway.

"The studio's proposal to close both directions of Imperial Highway from Nash Street to Aviation Boulevard would have significant impacts on LAX passengers, workers and air cargo businesses operating on the airport adjacent to Imperial Highway," Samson Mengistu, assistant executive director of the city agency that operates LAX, wrote to Steve MacDonald, president of Film L.A.

Cargo carriers especially are upset, claiming that filming could cost them thousands of dollars in delayed deliveries during their busy pre-holiday season. But filming advocates say that they will take steps to mitigate inconveniences and argue that such projects are crucial to keeping studios from taking location jobs elsewhere.

More..
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-me-diehard5oct05,1,5045445.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like a must-miss movie based on it's title...
other than that, studios are so greedy for their money it'll cost everyone else in order to make a buck, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. It wouldn't be so bad if they could actually make a GOOD movie.
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 11:58 PM by LibInTexas
The last couple of "Die Hards" pretty much sucked.

CGI being what it is, you really wouldn't have to close airports, etc. to make a movie.

"Poseidon", another really bad movie, was made without taking over a cruise ship. They just built the sets in a sound stage. And did CGI. They got the great effects but forgot to make a plot. Much like all the "Die Hard" movies.

But, LA is used to closing off streets and even airports to shoot a film. What's so different now? The scale?
Get over it, you live in la la land, where the next time you go to Starbucks, it might be surrounded by lights and trailers shooting the next whatever.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem2theMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Heck, just cause two fake 'accidents,' one each on the 105 and
Imperial Hwy. That would get them a nice big traffic jam, and they could film.

I mean, who would notice a traffic jam in LA? LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. Another Die-Hard???
Jeez, the first one was awesome, even the second was okay (The plane hitting the runway scene.....most gutwrenching scene in movie history)......but WTF? I thought Willis didn't need to do this series anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hogwyld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. he's a RW hack actor
trying to make an easy buck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC