Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Keep Condasleaza, Iraq, and Jr.'s newest signing statement kicked.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 08:34 AM
Original message
Keep Condasleaza, Iraq, and Jr.'s newest signing statement kicked.
Edited on Fri Oct-06-06 09:03 AM by bunny planet
I'm afraid there must be some reason they are trying to keep Denny Hastert in his position and something tells me they've decided the distraction is worth it for the time being. They'll get rid of him later, after the election, in the meantime their best bet is to keep us from talking about the even more important stories. Bush refuses to follow the law. Condi, Rumsfeld, and Ashcroft knew about the 9/11 attacks months before it happened. We lost 15 soldiers since the beginning of the month and we are losing control of Bagdad. They do everything for a reason, even if we can't figure out what it is. They met and decided to back Hastert and prevent him from stepping down for the time being. We must ask ourselves why???

Just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. pretty good assesment I'd say
this is starting to smell like distraction. Too many other things no one i talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bush Co is running from something....
Be it the meetings, their criminal activity, or anything off the long list. The Neo-Cons have the microphones and control the news. I think they are using Foley for cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I would have to be big...like attacking Iran without provocation on the
eve of elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC