Salem, MA poll being FReeped: Bush vs Clinton 9/11 attack

[chat_noir]

Did anyone in the U.S. government do enough to stop Osama bin Laden before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks?
Click here to tell us how you feel

http://www.salemnews.com/


Results: http://www.salemnews.com/?can_view=279191132

[Ian David]

1. Done! K&R!

Did anyone in the U.S. government do enough to stop Osama bin Laden before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks?
Click here to tell us how you feel
Clinton failed to take terrorism seriously. 39.87%
Bush failed to take terrorism seriously. 24.22%
Neither president took terrorism seriously. 15.87%
Both presidents did all they could. 1.88%
No one could have anticipated the threat terrorism posed. 18.16%
479 votes counted

[wakeme2008]

2. done kick and nom nt

[AtomicKitten]

3. done

[truthisfreedom]

4. K&R

[Lost-in-FL]

5. It needs help

done

[azmouse]

6. Done n/t

[lakeguy]

7. done nt

[stepnw1f]

8. kick! (nt)

[Caution]

9. Speaking as someone who lives in Salem

The people here know the score. Bush was killed in the last election and we're as blue as it gets. No Salem resident will be fooled by that poll. Additionally the Salem Evening News was purchased recently by an Alabama newspaper consortium and has taken a heavy rightwing slant, which cost them hundreds of subscriptions. Including mine. I wouldn't even bother with this one.

[Cha]

19. Oh, just for the crap of it.

Let's show 'em the truth.

[yy4me]

34. Good Morning Caution, glad to see a local. Marblehead here.

I thought there had been a change in the the News but I did not know they had been sold. Will check out the poll, vote and perhaps sent a little e-mail over that side of the border just to let them know how things really are.

[Sherman A1]

10. Done

I think you can vote multiple times. It seemed to work for me.

[biscotti]

11. done

[rosesaylavee]

12. Bush 30.85%

Did anyone in the U.S. government do enough to stop Osama bin Laden before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks?

Clinton failed to take terrorism seriously. 38.65%
Bush failed to take terrorism seriously. 30.85%
Neither president took terrorism seriously. 13.48%
Both presidents did all they could. 1.60%
No one could have anticipated the threat terrorism posed. 15.43%
564 votes counted

[K8-EEE]

13. DONE! Idiot freepers...

How can anybody think Bush did anything pre-9/11?? He didn't! He even said he needed a "wakeup call."

[DIKB]

14. How utterly

FUCKING ridiculous, that ANYONE thinks * took terrorism seriously prior to 9/11. Anyone with half a brain knows the Cole bombing took place in Oct of 2000, with them finding out it was Al Qaeda AFTER * took office and he STILL did nothing.

These people voting for * are morons who don't know they're morons. No one is more stupid, than the stupid man who thinks himself smart.

[proud patriot]

15. glad to help , one woman one vote

:kick:

[Little Star]

16. Done K&R

[bonito]

17. Done n/t

[Cha]

18. That's unacceptable..are they

insane?

Clinton failed to take terrorism seriously. 38.52%
Bush failed to take terrorism seriously. 31.10%

[stella]

20. I voted more than 1 time and

I sent them a message that with all the bombs Bush failed miserably to get Bin laden, he is still free as a bird.
After Katrina some of us can see why 9/11 happen on Bush`s watch.

[Hepburn]

21. Excellent response to the newspaper, IMO.

Too bad the Bush supporters cannot see the logic ~~ if Bush acted like he did during Katrina, no wonder Bin Laden took a shot at us on Bush's watch. I admire Clinton for saying he tried and failed. The bottom line is that at least Clinton tried. Bush did NOTHING and then Condi LIED about the warning which was received. Bush, IMO, is totally responsible ~~ it happened on his watch and, like I said, he had been warned. Too busy taking a vacation....:puke:

[City Lights]

22. done. eom

[tk2kewl]

23. .

[WePurrsevere]

24. Done.What Unbelievable Idiots!! Clinton failed 40.33% - Bush failed 35.29%

Clinton failed to take terrorism seriously. 40.33%
Bush failed to take terrorism seriously. 35.29%
Neither president took terrorism seriously. 10.76%
Both presidents did all they could. 1.50%
No one could have anticipated the threat terrorism posed. 12.13%
734 votes counted

[eppur_se_muova]

25. This poll can't possibly be honest!

I voted at least 40 times, and Bu**sh** is still behind!

Clinton failed to take terrorism seriously. 40.74%

Bush failed to take terrorism seriously. 35.58%

[jillan]

26. Done but it needs some DU help.

[stepnw1f]

27. kick

Clinton - 39.92%

Bush - 37.28%

Both - 10.08%

No One - 11.34%

*794 votes counted

[RobbinsdaleDem]

28. done

[AwakeAtLast]

29. Needs help kick n/t

[chat_noir]

30. dead heat

Clinton failed to take terrorism seriously. 39.06%

Bush failed to take terrorism seriously. 39.06%

Neither president took terrorism seriously. 9.74%

Both presidents did all they could. 1.32%

No one could have anticipated the threat terrorism posed. 10.82%

832 votes counte

[MagickMuffin]

31. Here's the latest numbers

Did anyone in the U.S. government do enough to stop Osama bin Laden before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks?
Click here to tell us how you feel

Clinton failed to take terrorism seriously. 38.92%
Bush failed to take terrorism seriously. 39.28%
Neither president took terrorism seriously. 9.70%
Both presidents did all they could. 1.32%
No one could have anticipated the threat terrorism posed. 10.78%
835 votes counted

[johnaries]

32. Done! Bush failed 40%

Clinton failed to take terrorism seriously. 38.14%
Bush failed to take terrorism seriously. 40.00%
Neither president took terrorism seriously. 9.65%
Both presidents did all they could. 1.28%
No one could have anticipated the threat terrorism posed. 10.93%
860 votes counted

[Vidar]

33. done

[andlor]

35. done

[stepnw1f]

36. "Bush Failed" Only at 41.47%?

kick

[stepnw1f]

37. kick (nt)

[sutz12]

38. Done.....Bush failed up to 42% nt

[OhioChick]

39. Done

Bush failed to take terrorism seriously. 42.19%