Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Lets Child Porn Defendant Walk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 01:27 AM
Original message
Judge Lets Child Porn Defendant Walk
Judge Lets Child Porn Defendant Walk

Oct 9, 9:09 PM (ET)


HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) - An Avon man who had been found with scores of images of child pornography on his computer and videos of children being violently raped has avoided prison time.

Edward J. Burke III, 47, was given a suspended sentence last week after going into a courtroom expecting to spend up to four years behind bars.

Burke, 47, of Avon, was convicted in a plea deal of two counts of first-degree possession of child pornography.

Prosecutor John F. Fahey told Judge Thomas P. Miano that Burke had 141 photo images and two videotapes of known child victims on a home computer. The victims ranged in age from toddlers to prepubescent children.

Fahey and Burke's defense lawyer, John D. Maxwell, had worked out a deal that called for Burke to receive up to four years in prison, five years' probation, and mandatory sex offender registration for 10 years.

But the agreement gave Maxwell the right to argue for a completely suspended prison sentence, which was granted by Superior Court Judge Thomas J. Miano.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061010/D8KLF5IG0.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. He was distributing it:
Authorities were directed at Burke after his Internet provider determined that he was distributing child porn images to others.

Which is even worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ecumenist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. WTF is going on??
This feels like the judge was saying in so many words, that it's okay to distribute kiddie porn, let alone have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Either the prosecutor slipped up, or he's not wound up about child porn
which seems unlikely in a prosecutor. Fahey agreed to a deal that looked like prison time for Burke, and didn't know (or didn't care?) that the defendent would be able to argue for a suspended sentence?

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC