Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

China's $1 trillion in foreign reserves

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-18-06 02:15 AM
Original message
China's $1 trillion in foreign reserves
http://feeds.bignewsnetwork.com/?sid=c51d74830dff47f9

China's holdings of foreign currencies and securities are about to rise to more than $1 trillion, an amount that far exceeds the nation's actual needs.

As of Sept. 30 its reserves totaled $987.9 billion, and they increase by some $20 billion a month. That means that in the next few days China's total foreign reserves will go to 13 figures.

Because about 70 percent of China's foreign reserves are in U.S. government bonds, the price of those bonds has stayed high and -- because bond prices and yields vary inversely -- U.S. interest rates low. But because most of China's foreign reserves are in U.S. dollars, any decision to exchange such securities for non-U.S. holdings could have disastrous consequences for the U.S. economy.
more...

We have been such fools
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vexatious Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-18-06 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. grim times ahead
Do you think it's time to start stockpiling canned food, or will it just be a recession?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-18-06 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Circa 2217, archaeologists unearth "Prosperity Banners" from dying America
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-18-06 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. I've been saying this for awhile.
The recession's going to get worse when that s*** hits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-18-06 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. All that paper is worthless if no one is left with ability to buy China's
products. Just a reminder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-18-06 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. US recession would help China? People will only be able to afford the
inexpensive goods that China produces. Every one will shop walmart?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-18-06 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. US GDP is about 1/4th of the world's entire GDP
Edited on Wed Oct-18-06 10:58 PM by EVDebs
It's a downward spiral; besides if China holds "worthless" US paper we will be able to redirect some of that trade. Wal Mart is a 'monopsony'

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopsony

A downward spiral doesn't help either country. Besides, if oil's price rises in the future, it pays WalMart to direct purchases of goods in a more local trade scheme. Low oil prices subsidize WalMart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-19-06 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Gotcha thanks. So it is in china's best interest for US economy
Edited on Thu Oct-19-06 05:47 AM by cassiepriam
to stay strong?

May I ask you why China is holding all our paper then?
What advantage is it to them in practical terms?
Political power? I know the Chinese are long term thinkers and very smart about this kind of thing.
What is their strategy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-19-06 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Ask the Japanese who hold much US paper/real estate
Edited on Thu Oct-19-06 10:52 AM by EVDebs
BTW, they aren't holding "all our paper". Wealthy US hold much; Saudis etc. too.

See foreign holdings of US debt
http://www.house.gov/tanner/foreignholdings.htm

and US Treasury link in link above for fully examination
http://www.treas.gov/tic/mfh.txt

and see Consequenced of foreign ownership of US debt at
http://www.answers.com/topic/united-states-public-debt

China seems to have become a part of the US web of economic interconnectedness that is intended to prevent wars in the future: you're less likely to fight your trading partners.

Weathly in the US (that 1 and 1/2 % we hear so much about, and 'Bush's base') hold 56% of the public debt, foreign interests hold the remaining 44%,

""It is common for individual Americans and businesses to buy bonds and other securities, though much of the debt is now held overseas. At the end of 2004, foreign holdings of Treasury debt were $1,886 billion, which was 44 percent of the total debt held by the public. Foreign central banks owned 64 percent of the Federal debt held by foreign residents; private investors owned nearly all the rest (figures are from the Analytical Perspectives of the 2006 U.S. Budget, page 257 <1>). The country holding by far the most debt is Japan which held $679 billion at the end of March, 2005. In recent years the People's Republic of China has also become a major holder of Treasury debt, holding $223.5 billion at that time.""

'Structure of the debt' at
http://experts.about.com/e/u/u/U.S._public_debt.htm

The more pressing issue is wealth accumulation at the highest income percentages along with the issue of wealth redistribution, or, as Louis Brandeis once said, "you can have great wealth or a democracy, but you cannot have both".



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-19-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think we are an oligarchy now.
Edited on Thu Oct-19-06 05:50 PM by cassiepriam
Thanks for all the info.

PS I didn't realize that Japan held the highest
amt of our debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-19-06 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Logical.
Re: Trading partners are less likely to war against each other.

Bizarre, but it too is a form of symbiosis...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC