Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

E-voting Push Started With HAVA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 08:17 PM
Original message
E-voting Push Started With HAVA
October 23, 2006 (Computerworld) -- The push for states to quickly adopt electronic voting systems can be traced to passage of the Help America Vote Act in October 2002.

The legislation was written as part of an effort to avoid problems with older voting systems, including the so-called dimpled ballots that caused significant strife in Florida in particular and the U.S. in general following the contested 2000 presidential race.

The act left all 50 states scrambling to comply with its mandates, including a requirement that manual voting systems, such as lever-activated machines and punch cards, be replaced with electronic voting machines. It also stipulates that every voting precinct in the country must have a handicapped-accessible voting machine and that each state must create a comprehensive database of all voters.

The legislation also provided $3 billion in funding to help state and local elections agencies buy e-voting machines and train poll workers.

The law required that all states comply with the mandates by January 2006. At least one state, New York, was sued by the U.S. Department of Justice for noncompliance. New York election officials say they are still in the process of procuring e-voting machines to replace lever systems long used in the state.

Several state officials said that the law provides inadequate federal funding to implement widespread e-voting.

MORE
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=government&articleId=269514&taxonomyId=13&intsrc=kc_top
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. There is a lot of disinformation in this apparently objective article.
HAVA does *NOT* require or mandate electronic voting. That is a MYTH.

See "MythBreakers" www.votersunite.org ( easy primer on electronic voting.)

I believe it was $3.9 billion (not $3 billion), and the money was not to help anybody vote. The money was to pour into the pockets of Bushite electronic voting corporations, through the fingers of local/state officials, to thoroughly corrupt our voting system, and remove all transparency and verifiability from the counting of our votes, prior to the 2004 election. These extremely insecure and insider hackable voting systems were fast-tracked by corruptive power of the money, and by the corporations' lavish lobbying; they were never properly tested or vetted, and most election officials bought them not having clue as to how they worked, and yielded like dumbasses to the corporations' demand that our voting system must be run on TRADE SECRET, PROPRIETARY programming code, with virtually no audit/recount controls.

All this was engineered by the biggest crooks in the Anthrax Congress, Tom Delay and Bob Ney, abetted by corporatist 'Democrats' like Christopher Dodd. And the chief beneficiaries were...

DIEBOLD: Until recently, headed by Wally O'Dell, a Bush-Cheney campaign chair and major fundraiser (a Bush "Pioneer," right up there with Ken Lay), who promised in writing to "deliver Ohio's electoral votes to Bush-Cheney in 2004"; and

ES&S: A spinoff of Diebold (similar computer architecture), initially funded by rightwing billionaire Howard Ahmanson, who also gave one million dollars to the extremist 'christian' Chalcedon Foundation (which touts the death penalty for homosexuals, among other things). Diebold and ES&S have an incestuous relationship; they are run by two brothers, Bob and Todd Urosevich.

These are the people who "counted" 80% of the nation's votes in 2004, under a veil of corporate secrecy.

Also, SEQUOIA: The third major election theft industry player, which hired Republican Bill Jones, former Calif Secretary of State, and his chief aide, Alfie Charles, to peddle their machines--in an outstanding example of one of the highly corrupt practices that HAVA fosters-- "revolving door" employment--in addition to lavish lobbying, corporate secrecy, corporate lawyers writing our laws, and the heady power of multi-million dollar electronics contracts in government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. you are absolutely right. I testified at local hearings about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC