Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We cannot demonstrate in the SOTU ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Mossadeq Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:01 AM
Original message
We cannot demonstrate in the SOTU ?
Maybe I am confused, But Cindy showed anti-war support at the SOTU.

And last year the repubs all held up purple fingers showing their support for war.

WTF, Am I missing something ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. yes, it's very simple
the Bushco definition of "demonstrating" is: saying, wearing, or thinking anything Bush doesn't like, approve of, or agree with. :evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. When you see how differently the two mothers were treated
one who believed in the war, was clapped for and given lavish attention. The one who does not believe in the war was taken out in handcuffs for a t-shirt stating how many soldiers have died. I see no better time to remember our dead than at the SOTU speech...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. You cannot have banners in the gallery. That's the rule. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeanette in FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. What banner are you talking about?
Cindy did not have a banner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. What banner? That's just Freeper exaggeration, otherwise known as lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Hello? Anyone Home?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not in the U.S.A.S.S.R.
Not under the despotic regime we're under.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe back in the days of the Republic, but not any more. NT
Edited on Wed Feb-01-06 09:06 AM by Benhurst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. They are busily suppressing dissent everywhere.
They don't abide peaceful dissent, checkout section 215 in the Patriot Act. It makes certain "disruptive activities" felonies if they occur in an area where the president or someone else who the secret service is protecting is at or will be at.

The police state is nigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. Know your Patriot Act, and live within it's imprint
It's not your Grandfather's Bill of Rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meisje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. protesting in the chambers is illegal
had it been a different cop ,she may have been allowed to stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Exactly Right
What she did, technically, was illegal. It's not about free speech zones, but more about rules protecting 'the dignity' of the house. Those areas are open to the public much of the time, for people to watch the process, and the rules are very strict concerning what they can do, wear, and say while up there, so as not to distract from the floor.

That said, the agent should have realized that she would never have gotten there if she was a real threat and simply asked her to rebutton her blouse. Or if they were going to go, calmly remove her instead of bruising and dragging her away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hwmnbn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. maybe we should put purple paint.....
on our middle finger instead and raise it everytime the chimp speaks.

That way the idiot won't know what to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. They were discussing this on CNN this AM with Johnathan Turley
a law professor. Mr Turley said they've been getting much tougher on conduct in Congress recently, but it's quite biased to the Pub side. He said this is not the only icident, nor was it the first. There was a woman arrested a short time ago for standing up during a hearing and asking to speak. She was removed, arrested and CONVICTED!

He said there is only one rule they could possible be sighting in the Sheehan case. The one that refers to "wear proper business attire", but it's a real stretch to say that applies to a tee shirt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
13. good point. we will have to use it. thanks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC