Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are you more socially or fiscally liberal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 07:07 PM
Original message
Poll question: Are you more socially or fiscally liberal?
I'd have to say I'm about the same. Socially, I'm against the death penalty, support gay marriage or total equality under the law, against the Patriot Act, am almost always for peaceful solutions, am for separation of church and state, am for environment over corporations, and am pro-choice. Morally, though, I'm against abortion - and I only support limited affirmative action programs. And I'm a Christian (don't really put myself in a certain denomination.) I also can see limiting illegal immigration. Fiscally, I support very high taxes on the rich, but no tax increases on the middle or lower classes unless necessary. I think we should have embraced solar energy more a long time ago, and am against outsourcing too much. But I see big deficits as harmful.

Note about the "am more liberal socially" option: this means that you are more traditionally conservative on fiscal matters. The right wing option refers to Bush fiscal policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fiscally liberal = budget surpluses
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Please define "socially liberal" and "fiscally liberal". IMO you use them
as though they are mutually exclusive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. No, I mean in levels
Edited on Wed Feb-01-06 07:29 PM by mvd
For example, if you want taxes to return to Clinton levels, you might not be as fiscally liberal as me. But if you are very liberal on all of the social issues I mentioned (gay marriage, abortion, war/peace,) you'd choose "more socially liberal."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. You place socially liberal on one end of a continuum and fiscally liberal
on the other end.

Apparently you define socially liberal as supporting "gay marriage, abortion" but what do you mean by "fiscally liberal"?

Do you mean "fiscally liberal" as continuing to increase the national debt or do you mean that low-income workers and unemployed pay little or no taxes while partaking of health, education, housing at someone else's expense? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I've defined fiscally liberal
Edited on Wed Feb-01-06 08:35 PM by mvd
It is:

high taxes on rich
strong social programs and social safety net
small deficits are ok
expansive health care programs
high regulation of corporations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. OK but that definition of fiscally liberal says nothing about gay marriage
abortion, etc.

Your poll contrasts fiscally liberal with socially liberal as though at the extreme they are mutually exclusive.

Your explanations however suggest that one can be fiscally liberal and also for gay marriage, abortion, etc., i.e. simultaneously fiscally liberal and socially liberal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. You have to look at the overall picture for both..
Edited on Wed Feb-01-06 09:04 PM by mvd
fiscally and socially. And then make a judgment call. I see no contrast. You don't have to be fiscally conservative if you are extremely socially liberal. You hear politicians say all the time "fiscally liberal, socially moderate" and things like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I've looked at the overall picture and IMO you've failed to define your
terms for a poll so that answers are meaningful.

I guess we simply disagree so thanks for the exchange.

Have a wonderful evening and may good fortune come your way tomorrow. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. You, too
Edited on Wed Feb-01-06 09:24 PM by mvd
:hi:

It makes perfect sense to me and other posters here, but I'm not sure what else I can say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. What does 'fiscally liberal' mean nowdays?
I'm strongly in favor of balanced budgets and living within our means, but I see social entitlement programs as one of the important functions of a government. I'd slash the military budget except for NASA (in half!), cut the tax cuts to the rich to restore a progressive tax system, and fully fund social programs within our means.

Does that make me fiscally 'liberal' or 'conservative'?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Fiscally liberal.
Fiscal conservatism is the belief that we should cut taxes for the rich, boost pork spending (especially on unnecessary "defense" programs like Star Wars), underfund social programs, and download responsibilities to the states. If you're not running a large defecit, then you're not a conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NaturalHigh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Actually, that's not "fiscally conservative."
What you're describing is right-wing corporatism. There's actually a big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Conservatism is right-wing corporatism.
Always has been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NaturalHigh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Sorry, I disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. That's not fiscally conservative, that's 'supply side' economics
...Which is anything but conservative, since it runs up large deficits as you point out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Which is what conservatism is all about.
It's been 50 years since a Republican president signed a balanced budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I'd say fairly fiscally liberal
But the option you'd choose would be dependent on how you feel on social issues (abortion, gay rights, immigration, death penalty, war/peace, etc.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NaturalHigh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. I had to vote "other."
I'm not really for heavy taxes for anybody, nor am I for entitlement programs that reward people for not working. Taking away from one person to give to another person just seems wrong to me. That's why I am also against the corporate welfare programs that take tax dollars and give them to corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. Geez. My first thought was that the BushCO/neoconsters are EXTREMELY,...
,...fiscally liberal, spending what they don't have, profiteering off the same.

Like you, I believe in a trickle-up taxation system (poor pay nothing, middle some, rich more). I believe money collected should be applied towards advancing the nation as a whole: help the poor and oppressed, education and health care for all, R & D in energy alternatives, etc.

I am socially liberal BUT am a liberal with limits. Activities that pro-actively harm people should, naturally, be prohibited. Equality is imperative. Civil and human rights are absolutes, in my view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. They aren't traditionally conservative
Edited on Wed Feb-01-06 08:16 PM by mvd
But unlike liberals, they believe in low taxes for the rich, cutting social programs, gutting social security, low regulation, and mainly supporting the corporation over the individual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. Big time social liberal here! Fiscally, I'm a centrist. I definately
believe in most of the current "entitlement" programs, and programs to help the poor. Where I draw the line with a lot of "progressives" is that I'm not for a purely socialist country. As it is now, we're a socialist in many ways, and other than the programs that the repukes are trying to dismantle, and health care coverage that is desperately needed, I'm pretty content with our current socialist programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'm more of a social liberal than an economic liberal
But then again the true responsible party regarding fiscal policy is the Democrats, as Clinton proved. Look at the debt and deficits that Reagan, Poppy and Junior have run up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
14. As a Socialist Libertarian (aka Anarchist) count me as both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. In capitalism, $ gives you any type of justice you want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. I chose both but in reality
I am probably a bit more fiscally liberal. I am a little old and a little up tight socially although I am for gay rights and the right to choose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
24. Any idea how many social progams we could fund if we cut defense
just by a little bit - 15%

we could get most of our wish list.

The Pentagon pisses 15% of their budget. That number is a conservative estimate, since we never really know where that money goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC