Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Senate Intelligence Chairman: Bush Can Spy"...Rat Bastard Roberts!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 05:52 PM
Original message
"Senate Intelligence Chairman: Bush Can Spy"...Rat Bastard Roberts!!
:grr::grr::grr::grr:

Senate Intelligence Chairman: Bush Can Spy
By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer
1 hour ago

WASHINGTON - Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Pat Roberts said Friday the Bush administration's domestic spying is within the president's inherent power under the Constitution, and he rejected criticism that Congress was kept in the dark about it.

The program is "legal, necessary and reasonable," the Kansas Republican wrote in a 19-page letter, taking a particularly expansive view of the president's authority for the warrantless surveillance.

"Congress, by statute, cannot extinguish a core constitutional authority of the president," Roberts wrote.


Presidents from George Washington to George W. Bush have intercepted communications to ascertain enemy threats to national security, Roberts told the chairman and ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Roberts' letter came just three days before that panel was to question Attorney General Alberto Gonzales about the surveillance.<snip>


http://www.comcast.net/news/index.jsp?cat=GENERAL&fn=/2006/02/03/318717.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fuck him.
He is one of the main reasons the Dems must regain the Senate. Another big reason is SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is Pat Roberts a judge?
Constitutional scholar? Any experience in law interpretation? Then he is just saying what his king is telling him to. Pat Roberts should just shut the fuck up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't care what Roberts said. Bush broke the law. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wonder if he knows how much heat he will take for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. We'll see how high profile he is with his
bullshit when Gonzalez is in front of the committee with spittle running out the side of his mouth as Kennedy fries him on one side, and then Feingold turns him over and grills the other side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. LOL...but, but, but that will have to be discussed in private session.
I can't wait to see the Democrats skewer him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. They are WAAAAAY desperate.
This was all planned ahead of time. They knew long ago that this was going to be an impeachable issue, and Roberts signed on.

When we start locking them up, let's not forget Pat Roberts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Let's see if the law agrees with that thinking...I think not. Bush=liar
and lawless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. I sent an email. Tell him he is violating conservative principles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. Not to be confused with Dread Pirate Roberts.
But really, a statement like this is no surprise from Pat. What else is he going to say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SillyGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wonder if he would still say that if oh, say, HILLARY, got elected
President and decided to spy domestically without warrants. Betcha he and all his little republican cronies would be singing a different tune then.

I'm not optimistic about these hearings at all. Just another whitewash for Administration wrongdoings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. These people are traitors--bush broke the law period--The are
deserters-betraying America. A president is NOT above the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. No surprise.
This is an old debate, and there are people who believe the way Pat Roberts does. But they are wrong. The congress made the FISA law for just this reason. The US Supreme Court decided the Keith case even before that. Thus, both federal law and the Constitution, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in a case very similar to the current events, make clear the president does not have the right to spy in this manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. They're playing three card monty.
They're desperately trying to keep the focus lasered on al Qida evesdropping. Because that's not why he didn't go to the court and that's not what he's doing. He's spying on his political detractors and he's about to get caught.

That's like somebody nonchalantly walking out of a department store with a canoe on their head. The act is so blatant that nobody thinks they're stealing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC