Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OpEdNews: Action Alert! Contact Dems on Senate Judiciary Committee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 10:37 AM
Original message
OpEdNews: Action Alert! Contact Dems on Senate Judiciary Committee
OpEdNews
Action Alert! Contact Dems on Senate Judiciary Committee
by Carolyn Kay of Make Them Accountable
February 5, 2006

http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_carolyn__060205_action_alert_21__conta.htm

Who Will Protect our Civil Liberties?

To Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee:

Time Magazine reports that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales will testify before you tomorrow regarding the administration’s clearly illegal warrantless wiretapping. In the article is this statement: "he Attorney General plans to leave open the possibility that President Bush will ask the court to give blanket approval to the program, a step that some lawmakers and even some Administration officials contend would put it on more solid legal footing."
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1156499,00.html

I don’t understand how courts can give blanket ap
proval for this activity. The Fourth Amendment clearly states that we citizens have a “RIGHT” to be secure in our “persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures”, and that government must obtain a specific warrant based on specific, sworn information to violate that security. The Constitution clearly does not give the Executive the power to go on fishing expeditions, which is what their activities have been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Crazy Canuck Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. ...
"The Fourth Amendment clearly states that we citizens have a “RIGHT” to be secure in our “persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures”"

Unfortunately, you forgot to include the part that says, "unless it interferes with government activities in any way, shape or form.".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Slit Skirt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. this needs to be acted on...very, very important
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 15th 2024, 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC