Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton bashing at the Superbowl

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Roon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:34 AM
Original message
Clinton bashing at the Superbowl
In the opening segment,they were showing images of America over the last forty years and one clip they showed was of Clinton saying "I did not have sexual relations....."....even the Superbowl isn't safe from Clinton's cock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. What a bunch of shit. So many things that have happened throughout
history and that's what's important?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Did they show Kindasleezy Rice's comment about the "mushroom cloud"?
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 11:37 AM by Straight Shooter
We don't want the smoking gun to come in the form of a mushrom cloud."

I think it would have been the perfect touch, considering the witch was in the crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Shhhh, it's not the time to bring that up. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. There was definitely Carter-bashing...
in that segment about guy who was taken hostage. The narrator talked about how the hostage-takers refused to give in to Carter's demands, then showed Reagan announcing their release. Naturally they didn't get into how the Reagan administration negotiated the delay of the release.
That neocon Al Michaels probably produced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Remember, this is CBS, who refused to air anti-Bush ads on the Super Bowl
last year, and editted out the word cock from a Rolling Stones song!

Better question: WHY DID DR. GAP CONTRADICTA RICE GET A LONG CAMERA SHOT DURING AARON NEVILLE'S DESTRUCTION OF THE STAR SPANGLED BANNER?!?!??!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Neville destroyed the Star Spangled Banner?
If true, that's very sad. :(

I love his voice. He sings "O Holy Night" like an angel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ticapnews Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. This was ABC...
not CBS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. My mistake. . .still, the Networks are owned by major corps
so it's their spin on everything!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The White Tree Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Actually it was ABC who aired the game
But I think the original poster is correct, I cannot inderstand why they would include the clip of Clinton in what was a omnatge juxtaposing the superbowl against the times. It had absolutely no relevence.

It certainly bears some investigation, I hope Media Matters or even Ken Oberman picks up on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm sure that smug asshole Al Michaels got a chuckle out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zambero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. Was Bush2 included?
Any choice segements? Such as the big 2004 campaign trail lie reassuring us that, as always, no wiretapping of U.S. citizens would ever take place without a proper court order? Didn't think so! To put a better face on this type of omission, I'm starting to get the impression that most Amercians now view Bush as an inherent liar -- someone who dispenses with the truth every time he opens his mouth. Clinton's lies on the other hand were infrequent, being "situational" and personal in nature, and not dealing with critical policy matters. So if there's general acceptance that Bush is a notorious liar who embraces disastrous policies, it's therefore "old news" which no longer requires further validation on the Super Bowl intro or anywhere else for that matter. On the other hand, Clinton's mistruths and indiscretions are perceived as incidental flaws in an otherwise successful 2-term presidency -- therefore they continue to stand out aginst that type of backdrop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Where was Bush's 16 words?
Bush oozing complements on Brownie?

Poppy vomiting on the Japanese Prime Minister?

Raygun exclaiming that he didn't sell weapons to the Death Squads?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC