Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What was left out in the Gonzo hearing on illegal wiretapping

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 06:19 AM
Original message
What was left out in the Gonzo hearing on illegal wiretapping
We've all speculated about his careful parsing of the phrases "the program that we're talking about today" or "the program that the President has confirmed". Now, barely a week after Rove comes out with the marching orders that spinning the wiretap issues the right way will lead to (R) victories in the upcoming elections - suddenly we've got (R)'s calling for investigations and more info. Have they returned to their actual "no big gov't intrusion" conservative roots or might there be another game in play?

Polls are showing way too many Americans upset by this issue for the ReThugs to simply spin it once again as "you're either for illegal wiretaps or with the terrorists". So, to win elections, they need to show how strong they are on Law & Order, holding the (mis)Administration accountable.

What steps do they have to take to 'win' on this issue?

  1. Loudly call for investigations
  2. Admin finally gives in and forks up more info (on the program that the President confirmed)
  3. Committee reports verify cumbersome nature of current law, everything changed 9/11, blah, blah
  4. Write new law, very specific to this one issue that President confirmed
  5. Start PR campaign to shift from broken law and illegal activity to how they strenghtend America by enacting new law in WOT
  6. Demonize Democrats for obstructing over any arguements
  7. Carefully word new law to allow all other surveillance gov't wishes to do under Total Info Awareness


Boomantribune.com
Gonzales came to the committee to discuss one thing and one thing only. He calls it the "Terrorist Surveillance Program" (TSP), a term coined by bloggers. I will refer to it as NSA Domestic Spying Plan One (DSP1).

<snip>

What nobody talked about was all the other DSP programs, numbers 2-999. The ones that are not strictly focused on international calls. I'm talking about programs like data mining browser and search engine usage (DSP2), surveillance of peace and anti-war groups (DSP3), data mining emails (DSP4), using JPEN and other "total information awareness" type databases (DSP5), using computers to data mine domestic phone calls (DSP6), passing along NSA information on Americans (illegal) to other agencies like the FBI (DSP7), etc.

The Senate hearings were interesting, that's for sure, but they were largely useless. Gonzales was there to talk about DSP1 and only DSP1 and since it involves people reasonably believed to be Al-Qaeda terrorists, the Congress is going to do nothing about it. The American people don't care if the government is spying on Al-Qaeda (even in America), in fact they support it wholeheartedly. I finally figured out why the administration is stumping on the issue - it's because they're only talking about DSP1 and it sounds great. Who could really be opposed to spying on "known" terrorists?

DSP1 is just one tiny "tool" used by the administration and it is by far the most acceptable one to the American people. When the New York Times revealed that there were DSP's, the administration focused on DSP1 and only on DSP1 and framed it in such a way that only petty sticklers to the law could object. This is a war after all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Any information from the AG. Who's AG is he? Not ours
I am starting to think my ancestors did not fight in the Revolutions but were Royalist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. IIRC, he swore he'd be AG for the country and be independant
during his nomination hearings. He lied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watrwefitinfor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Let's play connect the dots.
Edited on Thu Feb-09-06 07:01 AM by watrwefitinfor
US Plans Massive Data Sweep
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0209/p01s02-uspo.html

The US government is developing a massive computer system that can collect huge amounts of data and, by linking far-flung information from blogs and e-mail to government records and intelligence reports, search for patterns of terrorist activity.

The core of this effort is a little-known system called Analysis, Dissemination, Visualization, Insight, and Semantic Enhancement (ADVISE). Only a few public documents mention it. ADVISE is a research and development program within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), part of its three-year-old "Threat and Vulnerability, Testing and Assessment" portfolio. The TVTA received nearly $50 million in federal funding this year.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2095810


White House Gives Details on Surveillance
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-5603679,00.html

WASHINGTON (AP) — After weeks of insisting it would not reveal details of its domestic eavesdropping, the White House reversed course Wednesday and provided a House committee with highly classified information about the program.

“It’s a different program than I was beginning to let myself believe,” said Alabama Rep. Bud Cramer, the senior Democrat on the Intelligence Committee’s oversight subcommittee.

“This may be a valuable program,” Cramer said...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2095022


And does all this indicate why they might have been unwilling to have Gonzo testify under oath?

Wat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Worse than you think...It's all TIA with Global Information Group Ltd
Edited on Thu Feb-09-06 11:29 AM by EVDebs
in the Bahamas now. Offshore, privatized, out of DOJ or anyone else's jurisdiction. Very convenient. Just error prone (since they're using ChoicePoint's data known for being hackable). CSMonitor has also reported on RFIDs and the background checking business, with errors.

The two, put together, can be used against critics of the administration very effectively. You won't get a job...ever...again.

Total Surveillance
http://www.motherjones.com/interview/2005/12/albrecht.html

Couple this insidious technology with purposely erroneous background checks

Who is checking the background checkers?
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1128/p13s02-wmgn.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. WH did # 2 yesterday-big headlines of how Gonzalas and Hayden

briefed members of the committee.


Admin finally gives in and forks up more info (on the program that the President confirmed)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. #'s 3 & 4 are underway - the Gonzo hearings and Specter on the floor
yesterday speaking about introducing legislation that says the president has to follow the law that was already passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. what was REALLY missing was a video of gonzo's private sex life
they should have gotten (possibly doctored) video of gonzo inserting all sorts or wacky thing up his butt for sexual gratification, and then said, "is THIS what you want our government to have the authority to collect, view, and archive in the process of trying to find terrorists?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. What was left out? The swearing in part! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. How many times do I have to say it? Until we can give the public
the names of the targets for these illegal wiretaps, the Republicans can and will do all the tap dancing they want. All we need is to bring out a few examples where it's clear that Bush went after partisan political opponents which had nothing to do with Al Qaeda. That's it.

Well, then there needs to be an upswelling of outrage from the Democrats, because your average Republican will say, so what? You've got to show it's not acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. It was a 'vacuum cleaner' job. The names are every one of us !
Edited on Thu Feb-09-06 11:38 AM by EVDebs
Don't you see ? This was 'profiling' on a national level. All US citizens, as suspects, had to have their data checked. It was sent offshore, via CAPPS II (TIA) to Global Information Group Ltd. in the Bahamas. The datamining done offshore was then wired back to the mainland. They could just as easily have done this in Bangalore India but, hey, vacation trips off south FL are easier for retired CIA-types along the eastern seaboard.

The already conservative-laden national security apparatus rejects liberal views and constraints related to 'laws' anyway. Black bag jobs, especially with the whitecollar crime aspect of stealing everyone's data, signed off via fineprint, contained in banking and medical records etc etc, means that Karl Rove and his dirt-dealers have a treasure trove of data to work on in their neverending job of terrorizing the last living liberal they can find. See post #9 above to see the details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. All significant information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC