Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Official Homeland Security Committee Brownie Bake – Thread 7

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:14 PM
Original message
Official Homeland Security Committee Brownie Bake – Thread 7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. last Q-why did it take Fema so long to get buses to LA. B. does not know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. b. does not think military needs to be involved. but fema should replicate
what military does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. says military would be diluted in their mission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. says active military--would be slippery sloop. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. He'd sit in his hotel room crying...
Was that before or after he actively searched for a dogsitter? Grrrrrrrrrrr...

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. and checked his wardrobe and his dinner reservations
Good question. Wish they would ask that one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Bush cronys don't cry...lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrat 4 Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
25. Is this hearing an end run to do away with "Posse Comitatus?"
I keep hearing during this hearing that the military was ready to act, had the ability, leaders, plans, etc. but Posse Comitatus kept DHS and Brownie's hands tied. (Poor Babies!)This seems to be a theme the Repugs are obliquely referring to in their questions time and time again.

Is Command Chucklenuts thinking that having having "his" military unavailable domestically just a little too restrictive for the PNAC's, neocons' and the fruitcakes' plans?

There is already talk of doing away with the two term limit for the president and a king always needs a standing army to fight off insurgents within.

I'm just asking....

Carefully removing my tinfoil hat and placing it on a hat form for safe keeping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. They are LYING. READ THE DHS NATIONAL RESPONSE PLAN
Here is an analysis of some key parts. They - the Secretaries of Defense and DHS and Bush - ALREADY have the authority to take control in emergencies:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4668155
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
63. I think I'll try that one if I totally f*ck something up at work.
"I was so upset about ignoring emergencies while making restaurant reservations that I spent all day yesterday in tears about it."

"I was so upset about a bunch of our customers dying due to my negligence that I was at home all day bawling my eyes out. And, by the way, that will be a paid sick day, won't it?"

Maybe they'll "ask me to resign" and then turn right around and offer me a lucrative consulting position! I mean, that's the way it works, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Back to Warner -- asking about military (of course)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Warner trying to get Brown to say military must be involved in such cases
Brown: You have to be careful because the military has a mission and you have to be careful about deluding that mission with all these other things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Brown began slippery slope argument & Warner cut him off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
111. yes, i heard that. Warner wants the active military involved in domestic
stuff such as this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. The picture of the troop carrier looks like it was taken in a third world
Edited on Fri Feb-10-06 12:18 PM by CottonBear
country not in the USA. :cry:

This hearing is so depressing. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. It is sad, isn't it?
But, we need to remember what was going on while this guy was "crying in his room". At least he had a room. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. Warner does not want to hear how this war
has affected our Soldier's capabilities to react quickly to these situations...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:22 PM
Original message
we forget and Brownie does also that there was an election-that is why
things went so so well for him in FL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
24. yes, Jebbie spared no effort to make sure he got rave reviews n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. Are they trying to prove the military is the most capable...
...to deal with national disasters with this line of questioning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. It seems that's what Warner is trying to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yes.
That was exactly what he was trying to get him to say. The military should have been/should be in charge in cases of natural disaster.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. That's what Bush & the neocon cabal wants - it's been their agenda
with the hurricanes from the start and Warner is the perfect toad to push it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:47 PM
Original message
Yep and that reminded me that Warner was the one pushing that
right away. He's definitely still working that agenda.
Here's a link to and a quote from a USA Today article from last Sept. about that: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-09-18-katrina-military_x.htm

"Sen. John Warner, R-Va., head of the Armed Services Committee, wants to review that law to reconsider the role of troops in natural disasters."

Here's a link with more about it: http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/earlywarning/2005/09/rumsfeld_to_kat.html


They didn't get that change then. Looks like they are still trying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. So why did it take DAYS to get food and water to those people?
That's the response question I want asked !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Days? They were still dying of dehydration WEEKS after the storm n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. does brownie not know that FAA was in charge of getting buses
FAA gave a contract to fla company with no previous business in this area..

and they made 200 million..and they called a limo company in NEW YORK!! 4 days after hurricane looking for buses????????

who tuned this over to FAA..why was it not still under fema?????

why was a contract given to jebbies friend who had no background in fema or getting fucking buses??????????

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. hey, you be up in the Sen. chairs asking questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. I'd love to have Mama Fly up there.
:popcorn: We'd get some answers, that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Brown was saying he was stuck in Baton Rouge and asked DOT
to get the 500 buses. If that is true, why did DOT turn it over to FAA? How in the hell did it get to FAA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Federal Aviation Administration? WTF? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. no contract written long before katrina hit..Faa was put in charge when
homland security merged with fema..it was a pre-exisiting contract FAA wrote with jebbies buddy of a company that had no buses, no trucks...a shell company...a 200 million $$$ contract
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. they were using fema money and flipping it alll over to give payola
to all their buddies..same as when the hurricanes hit fla the year before and payola was handed out to thousands and thousands in Miami ..for hurricane damage..to buy votes...only problem was..miami was never hit by any of the hurricanes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
42. we here in clearwater were screaming to the country before 2004 election
that we were getting no repairs..no help ..but Miami was getting shit loads of fema money..

and no hurricane hit them!!

and we were ignored..we were screaming that it was buying votes!

so now we know jebbies buddie gets a 200 million contract for securing busses for any hurricane..when the company was a shell..with no experience in busses ..and they got the contract through FAA

that this shell company 4 days after katrina..calls a "LIMO " company in new york city looking for busses...

follow the money folks..who put the busses charge under FAA??

who wrote that order..who took the busses out of fema charge???????

who wrote the check to this fla shell company????????

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. all questions we should find out the answers to n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. The answers to those questions need to be found and exposed, Fly
There are rings within rings of scandals, cronies and limitless greed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #47
57. Limitless greed...
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #57
64. ...and not even a vestige if a conscience
Edited on Fri Feb-10-06 12:47 PM by Nothing Without Hope
And this whole network has been knowingly nurtured and protected and fed upon by the government leaders and their cronies in the media and elsewhere. Conspiracy on a truly massive scale and utterly sickening in its soulless rapacity and arrogance.

:grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gimama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. FAA(airport screeners/security!)always bug out 1st..
EVERY hurricane,last season People were stranded for weeks, that could have evac'd pre-landfall. Nobody ever asks why screeners aren't required to stay, at least till mandatory evacs are near completed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
26. Rhode: I do believe this was an incredible challenge. I would like to see
in addition to FEMA improvements, greater accountability in the national emergency management system. Greater roles and responsibilities between all levels of government and government agencies. Build a greater matrix of goals and deliverables.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
31. Akaka -- Brown was named PFO the day after Katrina hit. Brown had to
relinquish his role as Head of FEMA. Rhode, when were you made aware that you were the acting Director of FEMA.

Rhode: I don't know that I've heard that.

Says he joined FEMA in April 2003 and left in Jan. 2006.

He was not aware that he was acting director.

Akaka -- According to the plan, Brown was no longer the director of FEMA.

(hmmm... that's interesting)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Rhode: I was not aware that I was the acting Director.
Why is Akaka hitting on this so hard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Yeah, how do you not know that you're the acting director? - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. He didn't get the "ping."
What's this freeper "ping" crap Brownie is talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. That is what I was wondering
I thought I heard him say that, thus my question right after your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. My ears perked up on that one too!
Supposedly, it's a phone call. But, it's evidence of freakspeak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #39
77. tells me the decison was made high up and he was last to find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #35
49. I've only heard "ping" used on submarines and in computer networking.
I think I've also heard it used with regards to instant messaging in a republican corporate setting as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #35
81. I'm sorry, Could you elaborate on this?
I've missed a huge chunk of this because of a meeting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
36. What did he call phone calls? I missed that phrase n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Pings? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dunvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #37
45. A "ping" is a "contact" via e-mail/phone/whatever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
40. Brown: I was never second-guessed in Florida. During Katrina, I would
make a decision only to find out it had been over-ridden by someone else or not carried through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #40
59. does anyone else have the fear i do that fema is going to be militarized?
is this the real reason for total failure during katrina and putting this boob brown in charge..to say..well civilians can't run fema we need to make fema military??

my palms are sweating..they wanted this total failure..they had to have this total failure to militarize fema!!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #59
65. they want to lower the bar for taking military control of any disaster!
they want to make it easy to take control away from states and governors!! this is a set up!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #59
107. It did seem to get better when the General (was he a general?)
came in and took over. They sure seem to be connecting those dots fairly well. Right down to the managers of the local parishes saying that things were going better after they came in too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #40
79. hey Brownie. it went well in FL cause there was an election (remember)??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
41. Hey... Hey... Dayton's back.
Isn't Coleman going to take his 2nd round?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. I don't now, but Brownie just implicated Hayden, Card, et al
Mon. afternoon, he messaged the WH Situation Room.

Thwack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
44. Brown: Just because it is in the NYT doesn't mean I believe it.
Edited on Fri Feb-10-06 12:41 PM by CornField
Brown goes back to his conversations with Card and "Deputy Chief of Staff" -- swears he spoke with them Monday afternoon to let them know it was definitely a breech.

Deputy Chief of Staff = Rove?

According to Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9308-2005Feb8.html
Rove is DCOS as of early 2005. But, they keep talking of Hagan in that post as well. I'm not sure who Brown was referring to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. Hagen or Hayden? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. My mistake: WH Deputy COS Joe Hagen eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. I just edited, I got it wrong -- he didn't say name, said 'Deputy Chief'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
52. Did Rove think Brownie would be the target today?
Was this a major BushCo snafu?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. I think the ultimate aim will still be to set up their calling for full
militarization of emergency response - power grab - and Warner's already been working on that angle. That's the plum, and they've been after it for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeanette in FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #52
61. I think you are right
I think that the Whitehouse gambled on the fact that Brownie was so humiliated and that the committee would take it from there and nail him to the cross. It surely went differently than I originally thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #52
62. They didnt invoke priviledge, they thought the public would
automatically condemn Brownie to hell and they could use him to make their case for the military to be the prime takeover in emergencies.

Brownie turns the tables by
  1. admitting mistakes, something so rare that it instantly boosts his credibility
  2. keeps saying what we need to do as though he's still employed and invested in the mission - again boosting his credibility
  3. backs up the points he makes about other's incompetence with documentation that contradicts some of the RW talking points


We were all so ready to jump on Brownie for him being an incompetent crony - and he did make mistakes - but we really never looked beyond to what it would be like to work in one of these incompetently run Depts that are run by Shrub's true loyalists. At least I didn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
53. Swearing in some others, but I lost CSPAN feed and can't say who it is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Broderick was sworn, and I'm not sure who the other one was. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. Robert Stephan asst homeland Sec. Secretary for infrastructure
protections and Matthew Broderick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. Dupe- LOL
Edited on Fri Feb-10-06 12:44 PM by CornField
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #53
60. Why is a lacky like Brown being sworn in but the damn Att. General can't?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #60
66. Brown is now a private citizen and no long under the cover of
Edited on Fri Feb-10-06 12:51 PM by Sydnie
the WH. Gonzales still gets a paycheck so he is given latitude. I agree. Both should be sworn in. I don't ever remember hearing about a hearing where official testimony is given without swearing in the witnesses.

edit - typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #60
67. Because they felt safe from what Brown could/would say but
Gonzales does nothing but lie and knows where the bodies are buried. He cannot safely testify without perjury at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #67
74. brown was kept out of the loop..he was not privy to the game the cons
were playing..he is a doofus ..they knew it and thats exactly why he was put in charge of fema..they want to totally militarize fema..and they needed a doofus ..they needed a total fuck up guy..

he fit their bill to a T

FLY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #60
68. what happens if a catasrophic earthquake in LA/SAN DIEGO < SAN FRAN
there is no week prior warning..

wow i see this so clear,.these fuckers want to take total power away from governors and states..they want to totally militarize disasters..

they want full power..and this is how they will take us into a complete police state!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. Posse Comitatus (like the Geneva Conventions) are now quaint, I reckon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. Exactly. And it's so clear that the DHS National Response Plan ALREADY
gives full emergency powers to the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security under the President's orders.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4668155

So not only do they ALREADY have all the power they could need to respond to disasters, they totally, utterly f**d it up and thousands died. And yes, I know the "official" total is still less, but it is thousands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #70
73. thisb was all done on purpose..it was their final test for a police state!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #73
83. The "enabling event" they had been waiting for, since it was a long time
Edited on Fri Feb-10-06 01:09 PM by Nothing Without Hope
since 9/11. And it had been predicted in the study reported in 2001 = most likely three US catastrophic events: NY terrorist attack, SF earthquake, and New Orleans hurricane.

No wonder Bush was grinning while he was playing that guitar and playing to the crowd. Even at the time DU people were commenting on how he looked like the cat that ate the canary and wondering why. I commented that myself and I recall others responding with a similar view. Coronation Day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #83
109. yes they knew they could not perform another 9/11 event..
Edited on Fri Feb-10-06 01:24 PM by flyarm
remember at the time the general who was being punished for an affair..they knew a military coup was being prepared..they knew how?? nsa tapping!

they were supposed to do a nuc test in the carolinas..they caught the generals planning a coup of this white house..they knew they needed Katrina..they wanted to take LA state control away from Blanco..

but someone on our side was giving Blanco advice ..i said at the time, it was B.Clinton..and thats why Clinton got james lee witt down to her pronto before the hurricane..witt helped Blanco write the emergency request to bush..Clinton knew this was happening..
and we wonder why he is so close to papa??

do not ever underestimate Clinton...he knew..he is like glue with James lee Witt..they worked like a fine violin in LA during earthquake,...
they were each others ying and yang..

i said the minute Witt went into LA ..clinton was behind that..clinton knew..he knew..what was going down...

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #70
76. and didn't they just change the chain of command should the
pResident and the VP be unable to respond (as in incapacitated or death?) Wasn't HLS moved up on the list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #76
95. yep!! ..and it also moved t. delay up! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #68
72. and where would be the most important places..why NY and CALIF..
the two states where people are progressive ..where they would fight back the hardest..the rest of the south and mid west would be easy...but the independant thinking people..they would be the toughest to control..

this was all a set up for what is to come..

this admin would not "let " fema work..they made sure Fema didn't work...

they blackmailed Blankco to take military control..

this was all a big test..
there was nothing in this that was a mistake..

i lived through the northridge earthquake in Sherman Oaks calif..i lost my home as did all my neighbors...Fema worked like clock work..it was organized..it was under control..Clinton was on top of all of it..it was a well oiled machine...

Katrina was used by these mother fuckers..to test taking over this country with military

this was testing the behaviour of americans and governors..and of congress...

i am sick...

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #72
75. That's how I see it too:
Edited on Fri Feb-10-06 01:31 PM by Nothing Without Hope
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4790112
thread title (Sept 16 2005): Missing A KEY POINT in *'s speech: POWER GRAB FOR POTUS AND MILITARY
including the posts throughout the thread

and it's still clear today:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x377040
thread title (2-10-06 GD): NYT: WH knew early about levee breaks - and BUSH POWER GRAB ALERT!

The system must really select for sociopathic swine, because they are running this country as their private sty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #75
90. YES ITS HOW I WAS SEEING IT AT THE TIME TOO.. and i know
you ..our dear nothing without hope saw it then as well..

but watching this baffon brown i was mesmerized.,.i saw it like the writing on the wall..and fucking Warner is in on it..i watch body language..i watch shit others don't see..and it was so clear today..they are sucking the people in..they are sucking those who do not want to believe their government is nefarious ..and evil..they are sucking all the innocents in..
i don't believe even some of the congress people get it..

even they are naive to what is happening..

hitler rove has to be sitting in his frankenstien lab laughing at it all..
laughing at how congress people are being sucked in..and the masses of americans are being sucked in...

can't you see his evil chuckle???????

nwh..you were on this from the get go..and so was i but this only confirmed what we saw and what we felt in our guts..and what we knew was going on!!

glad you are on my side!!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #90
114. You know, I tried to post on this earlier than that thread I just gave,
Edited on Fri Feb-10-06 01:28 PM by Nothing Without Hope
but it was VANISHED (totally gone, not locked) from DU as soon as it hit the Greatest Page in less than 5 minutes. The "conspiracy theory" that the WH might actually be trying to use the Katrina horror as an enabling event to grab more power and militarize all emergency response - including anything they want to call an emergency, like putting down dissent - was just too, too kooky for them. I was so terribly frustrated, because I could see it happening and I couldn't post. FINALLY a thread was allowed to stay up and it's the one I showed you:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4790112

And yes, the using up of the National Guard in foreign countries is part of it too. The WH claims that it made no difference to the Katrina relief response, but of course it DID and a study showed it:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1822336

It's all to grease the skids to a police state.

I'm glad you're on my side, Fly :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
71. This guy is worse than some of my college professors
His endless drone is putting me to sleep... I can't even make sense of what he's saying anymore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ralps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #71
86. Stephan & Broderick are trying to put all the blame on Brownie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
78. Is Broderick trying to say that they weren't clear what was needed
until the military got involved?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #78
80. he said he was a former military-lots of years (talks like it also).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #80
82. plan in effct april 15, 2005 signed by cherkoff. The big nat. plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #82
84. Stephan slamming brownie now (recall this is Chertoff's man talking)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #84
85. rule 1---Brownie was to keep Chertoff informed (and brownie said he
did not cause he did not see chertoff doing what was asked).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #85
87. oh oh: 'poor personal relationship with chertoff"--browie did not do his
duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #87
88. Why didn't the dummies turn on the TV-to learn that levies were broke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #82
89. This one - and it gives clear authority to Secretaries of Defense, DHS
and Bush at the top:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4668155

And they have been doing their best to pretend it doesn't exist, and also that Chertoff didn't delay making the key triggering declaration for DAYS:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4777642
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #89
98. dhs was shuffling paper-waiting for a chain of command. geech.


And they have been doing their best to pretend it doesn't exist, and also that Chertoff didn't delay making the key triggering declaration for DAYS:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
91. Broderick should have tuned on TV to watch the water come in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #91
92. hey dummy==when you hear water is over rooftops--get a clue!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #92
94. I can't believe this conversation!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #91
93. I was thinking the same damn thing
I was more informed by watching CNN and MSNBC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #93
96. so, cause chertoff did not 'official' word!!==paper watchers that was what
was going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
97. Collins: Who was on the ground and supposed to communicate
information to you.

Broderick: At that time it was Brown... under secretary Brown.
...

Juniors have a responsibility to keep their seniors informed. We were not getting that information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #97
101. So Chertoff told Brown to stay in Baton Rouge and didn't listen to any of
the desperate messages, let alone watch any TV - but it's all BROWN's fault?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #101
103. Depends on which cronie you wish to believe, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #101
105. these two guys up now are there to back up Chertoff-just remember that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #97
102. this is when Collins should have said-did you turn on the TV?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
99. So these twits were only watching the french quarter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
100. Collins: Did any FEMA reports get related to you?
Broderick: Not from Mr. Brown. We were getting reports from other agencies but not from Brown.

...

They were drinking and dancing and carrying on in the French Quarter (Monday) evening. It looked like they were having a party. We thought everything was okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #100
104. This is the old WH spin and IT IS A LIE:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x377040
thread title (2-10-06 GD): NYT: WH knew early about levee breaks - and BUSH POWER GRAB ALERT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #104
106. Just reporting what's being said in hearing -- not saying it is a fact
Didn't mean to imply I was giving these statements validity, just putting them out there because they are in direct contrast as to what we've already heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
108. Broderrick clearly laying it on Brown (response to Joe L.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
110. Lieberman asking Broderick tough questions.
Why no plan, given the briefings from Brown, warnings from weather guys etc.

Broderick says Brown was in the field, with assets, and so he was responsible. Lieberman says actually Brown did not have assets. Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #110
113. brown had little assets--was locally dependant for much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
112. Thread 8 is UP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parrcrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
115. please go to thread #8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC