Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hunters Saying Story Doesn't Make Sense

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:51 AM
Original message
Hunters Saying Story Doesn't Make Sense
1. Were they hunting too late in the day? There is a limit - there it would have been about 6:30 at nite.

2. Did they have the proper license required in Texas? Probably not.

3. Were they shooting from their cars? - Considered to be really tacky.

4. Were they imbibing? Not illegal on private land but pretty dangerous.

5. The story about the quail doesn't make sense either - one covey had flown up. Then another covey was flushed. According to the hunters any quail in the whole area would have flown at the first shot. The story about Cheney seeing a second covey flushed later - the covey that he shot at - doesn't hold water.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
montana500 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. very interesting....
There is clearly more to this than meets the eye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Safety rule #2
Always point the muzzle in a safe direction, know your target and know what is beyond it. It is the shooter's responsibility to to make sure he doesn't hit the wrong thing.

(Rule #1, of course, is to assume that every gun is loaded.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, the more I hear this story the more "fabricated" it sounds...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. They probably used the reporting delay to make up a good lie. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
39. Exactamundo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks for this information
My late stepfather hunted for decades, and was always very careful. He would look at anyone hunting from a car with pure disdain. He was a conservative and a member of the NRA. I'm wondering how many folks like him are wondering a bit about Cheney now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Do you need a license to hunt on private land?
What if the animal is raised to be hunted? I guess all the hunters are shaking their heads at my ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Not in Wisconsin. Game farm hunting doesn't require a license.
Most likely that's true in TX too, but I don't know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. it's a good question. Some states have less rules for private preserves
and canned hunts. The question is valid to help understand this incident. :thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
33. This is from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department's
hunting rule and regulations:

A hunting license is required of any person, regardless of age, who hunts any animal or bird in this state (except furbearers, if the hunter possesses a trapper's license). No license is required for nuisance fur-bearing animals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Thanks
Now, any way to find out if Cheney had that and if so, out of state or resident license.

That last part is a biggie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. when I heard that he came up BEHIND cheney
and then got shot by Cheney my bullshit meter went off too. Was the old dude sprinting across the field? Did Cheney leap into the air, whip his twin shotguns out of his crossed shoulder hosters and fire from the hip before gracefully completing the martial arts flip and landing on his crashcart?

:shrug:

I'm an enquiring mind, and I want to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. And as other DUers have noted,
How does one come up behind the VP with all those SS agents around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. ESPECIALLY if people are carrying guns! Was the victim also hunting?
The SS would have been watching VERY closely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
37. I've wondered that too..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. I am a visual thinker...
and that cracked me up! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. #1 looks like a good point. Did their lie put them in the dark?
Anybody know specifically when it went dark there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Here ya go
Edited on Mon Feb-13-06 12:04 PM by Richard D
11

Sun Set: 6:16pm
Twi: 6:41pm
Twi N: 7:08pm
Twi A: 7:36pm
Moon Rise: 5:07pm
Moon Set: 6:28am

On Edit:

Civil Twilight
Civil twilight is defined when the sun is 6 degrees below the horizon. This is the limit at which twilight illumination is sufficient, under good weather conditions, for terrestrial objects to be clearly distinguished; at the beginning of morning civil twilight, or end of evening civil twilight, the horizon is clearly defined and the brightest stars are visible under good atmospheric conditions in the absence of moonlight or other illumination. In the morning before the beginning of civil twilight and in the evening after the end of civil twilight, artificial illumination is normally required to carry on ordinary outdoor activities.

Nautical Twilight
Nautical twilight is defined when the sun is 12 degrees below the horizon. At the beginning or end of nautical twilight, under good atmospheric conditions and in the absence of other illumination, general outlines of ground objects may be distinguishable, but detailed outdoor operations are not possible, and the horizon is indistinct.

Astronomical Twilight
Astronomical twilight is defined when the sun is 18 degrees below the horizon. Before the beginning of astronomical twilight in the morning and after the end of astronomical twilight in the evening the sun does not contribute to sky illumination; for a considerable interval after the beginning of morning twilight and before the end of evening twilight, sky illumination is so faint that it is practically imperceptible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Looks like they had good light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. No, but it was probably still light at 5:30PM.
I lived in TX for 6 years, and it stayed daylight a bit longer than here on the east coast.

The story I heard about Cheney shooting a man who was behind him was that when the covey broke, he picked a bird, and folllowed it around 180 degrees keeping it in his sight then fired. I spoke to my husband this A about this. He has been hunting since he was 9 years old, and hunted a LOT of birds. He told me, at hunts like this, the hunters usually walk the field side by side, and you do follow the bird, BUT you DON'T swing around and shoot the guy beside you!!!!! Ever since he heard this last night, he has said this VP is a real IDIOT! Lots of hunters get shot because of stupidity, but the incidenets are usually because some dumba** shot into moving brush because they "thought" there was some game in there moving the bush, and turned out to be a hiding hunter, or long shots while deer hunting and some idiots do mistake a man for a deer! It's a very rare if ever that shooting accidents happen like this one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hwmnbn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. Alright!!.. we can now officially add Quail-gate....
to the growing list of scandals. It's not the shooting, it's the lying about it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. misinfo misinfo!
1. incident happened at approx. 5:15pm, right before dusk TX time.

2. License was aquired in Nov.

3. got out of car to shoot.

4. Probably

5. Tame birds *might* not have been flushed so easily.

that said - there was obviously gross negligence involved, and his license needs to be revoked, and he needs to charged. I'm sure we can expect to hear charges have been filed any minute now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. was it a resident license?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. doesn't say... just this
"Cheney purchased a hunt license in November, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department spokesman Steve Lightfoot said."


http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20060213-0658-cheney-huntingaccident.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. How do we know they were shooting from cars or trucks?
Maybe I've missed this part. Heck. I didn't know you could hunt quail form vehicles. I know Mrs. Armstrong was in a car. We know Cheney can't stand for long periods of time (VP debate sitting down, almost fell down at WH ceremnoy after knee artery operation) or walk anywhere. Did he get out to shoot or was in in a vehicle. I have no doubt he shot the poor bastard. He must be mighty careless. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. "Katharine Armstrong, the ranch's owner, said...
... said the accident occurred after Cheney, Whittington and another hunter got out of a car to shoot at a covey of quail. She said Whittington went to retrieve a bird he shot. Cheney and the third hunter, whom she would not identify, walked to another spot and discovered a second covey of quail."



http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=227692006
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. Any shooting requires a full investigation by the authorities. Correct?
The media keeps reporting this as an accident but that can't be determined until findings of an investigation are released. Even if this is an accident the VP could be charged with reckless firing of a weapon. Can't he? Believe it. This will get no investigation and will be brushed under the rug. Imagine any authority getting Cheney to sit down for an interview? Never happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. Apparently, TX law requires Doctors to report gunshot wounds to police. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. If this isn't an accident
Then why would Cheney want to kill this guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
34. Having the media calling this an accident assumes that Cheney
has had a finding already determined. Only an investigation can make that determination. It can also be determined to be an accident but the VP can still face charges of reckless discharge of weapon. The media by constantly assuming this was an accident makes it seem that Cheney can't be held responsible for anything. They should be reporting of the claim that it was an accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. That's all well and good
but did Cheney want to kill this guy for some reason and hiding it under the cover of an accident?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
40. Because Cheny needed the blood to invoke Cthulu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
20. Cheney's Chappaquiddick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. My father says the story is bogus.
He's a hunter safety instruction in PA, so he really doesn't hunt the way they do on ranches in Texas.

But, what he did tell me was this - a responsible hunter ALWAYS knows where members of his group are before firing. What happened was just plain carelessness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
27. the blood lust was on him bad....
Edited on Mon Feb-13-06 12:26 PM by mike_c
All those dead birds. Cheney snapped. It will eventually emerge that he wasn't actually found licking the bleeding victim and masturbating-- instead, Cheney was resuscitating the wounded man while trying to dislode a scorpion in his pants. Really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
28. About the imbibing...
I don't think Cheney would have been drinking. With his heart condition, I'm guessing he's on pretty strict orders not to have alchohol. :shrug: At least that's what my BIL's doc told him after he had was put into the hospital unexpectedly for a heart attack. And Cheney's had something like four surgeries on his ticker?

Nah. They weren't drinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. cheney is alcoholic w. multiple DUIs
he was drinking and so were his huntin buddies

you can take that to the bank

btw my parents have had bypass surgeries and they were only told to stop drinking during the first few weeks, now the cardiologist recommends a glass of red wine w. dinner ea. night -- only one glass but for an alcoholic even one glass would lead to another and another so assuming cheney receives similar advice he's prob. stinkin drunk most of the time

having heart disease doesn't mean cheney don't drink; if alcoholics stopped drinkin for mere health reasons there would be no alcoholics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
29. When has a story out of this misadministration EVER made sense?
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
30. Dead eye Dick probably was using the lawyer for target practice in lieu
of the SS practice range.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
32. Were they imbibing? Unquestionably. It's a South Texas hunting tradition,
but if you think Cheney has to be drinking to shoot a senior citizen, you haven't followed his career very closely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Look at the delay in seeking treatment; that's clearly "sober up" time.
If it wasn't an emergency, he wouldn't have been life flighted from the outlying hospital to the city hospital. So it must have been an emergency, but then the question arises why the delay in first coming to the hospital's emergency room? Ask this question of South Texas hunters, and "sobering up time" is the explanation that 9 out of 10 South Texas hunters will give you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
41. i just heard on Tom Hartman 70 birds were killed and
Edited on Mon Feb-13-06 01:16 PM by flyarm
i asked my husband who is an avid hunter...( american indian) ...and i asked him did he ever hunt with anyone who killed 70 birds..he said no never..he said that is just not done..no real hunter would kill that many birds..and no licence would allow any hunter to kill that many birds..

now my husband was shot many many years ago..while hunting..and one of the pellets entered his eye..he underwent horrible surgery..and my husband has a patch on his retina..he was one of the first in the country to have that surgery..by a Chinese dr..its the smae surgery that sugar ray leonard had after it was done on my husband..the pellet that went into my husbands eye detatched his retina..( hubby was very lucky and sees well with his eye..but the patch will be there forever)

accidents do happen hunting..today my husband does not hunt very much as it is a real sticking point with me..
it was horrible for me when he was shot..it was trumatic..in fact..of course he went through the physical trauma..but i went through the mental and psych. trauma...



but that aside..my husband said no real hunter would kill 70 birds..he said its unheard of..

and thats what Tom Hartman said a few minutes ago..

this was killing to kill not sportsmanship!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC