Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Q: Are the Secret Service agents sworn to "absolute" secrecy?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 09:28 AM
Original message
Q: Are the Secret Service agents sworn to "absolute" secrecy?



Are they only allowed to reveal what they are instructed to reveal?

What if they were witness to a felony or even a corporal felony. Would they be obliged to tell the tuth if questioned or would they heel to their masters?

Will we ever know what really happened? Will we have to wait forty years until some retired SS agent writes a book and tells all?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blue in ohio Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. you mean if (hypothetically, of course)
the vp shot someone... would ss have to disclose this....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Remember the Lewinsky matter.
Were the secret service agents required or allowed to diss Clinton? Does anyone remember exactly what happened there? I remember only that it was an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramblin_dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Here's a link but I don't know if
agents actually testified...


Judge: Secret Service Must Testify:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/22/lewinsky.scandal/

In another setback for President Bill Clinton, a federal judge has ruled Secret Service personnel must testify before the grand jury in the Monica Lewinsky controversy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Therein lies the rub.



We now have a rethuglican SCOTUS. A stacked deck. The truth will never see the light of day.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. When the first twins got in trouble on illegal drinking sprees...
I don't think herr SS was even asked about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yeah, and they took a minor to a bar
and waited outside for her to finish her partying.

A mere citizen would have been charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

Get used to it. When you live on the BushAmericn pig farm, all pigs are equal. Some are just more equal than others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. Now that is a book I would love to read........................
the collaborated 'tell ALL' book from the Secret Service Agents that served during the bushco WH. If only the WH walls could talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
7.  "Secret " is the effective adjective here... a few have talked but it
wouldnt be a good idea to piss those people off..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. Secret Service can be forced to testify in court
Just ask Bill Clinton . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC